{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,16]],"date-time":"2025-03-16T04:12:01Z","timestamp":1742098321774,"version":"3.38.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,1]],"date-time":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1730419200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,30]],"date-time":"2024-08-30T19:23:11Z","timestamp":1725045791000},"page":"87-93","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to cervical ripening balloon as second line of cervical ripening after first dinoprostone insert"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"302","author":[{"given":"Isabelle","family":"Pradeau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lucie","family":"Planche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J\u00e9rome","family":"Dimet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Norbert","family":"Winer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2549-353X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guillaume","family":"Ducarme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0005","first-page":"555","article-title":"Overview of induction of labor practices in France","volume":"47","author":"Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006","article-title":"Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units","volume":"47","author":"Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003448","article-title":"Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: the MAGPOP randomised controlled trial","volume":"18","author":"Diguisto","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-67","article-title":"Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial","volume":"13","author":"Ten Eikelder","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregn Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0030","first-page":"145","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature","volume":"31","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000361","article-title":"Induction of labor using a foley catheter or misoprostol: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"71","author":"ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84","article-title":"Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Pregn Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0045","article-title":"Mechanical methods for induction of labour","volume":"3","author":"de Vaan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10364","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1681","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)01845-1","article-title":"Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"400","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1007\/s40265-018-0995-2","article-title":"Dinoprostone vaginal insert: a review in cervical ripening","volume":"78","author":"Shirley","year":"2018","journal-title":"Drugs"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13715","article-title":"Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: A prospective cohort study: success of dinoprostone","volume":"44","author":"Daykan","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17794","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","author":"Patabendige","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2013.02.008","article-title":"Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary","volume":"41","author":"Petrovic Barbitch","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719115618272","article-title":"Vaginal dinoprostone versus intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in patients not responsive to a first dose of dinoprostone: a randomized prospective study","volume":"23","author":"Antonazzo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2074","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1236252","article-title":"Second dose of PGE 2 vaginal insert versus Foley transcervical balloon for induction of labor after failure of cervical ripening with PGE 2 vaginal insert","volume":"30","author":"Mohr-Sasson","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.034","article-title":"Repeated sustained release dinoprostone vaginal inserts in women with unfavorable cervix may increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage: preliminary results","volume":"202","author":"Hannigsberg","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05414-3","article-title":"Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol","author":"Mancarella","year":"2024","journal-title":"Minerva Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-019-3985-0","article-title":"Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess\u00ae), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"Coste Mazeau","year":"2020","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-058282","article-title":"Groupe de Recherche en Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique. Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"13","author":"De Berti","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMJ Open"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524004779?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524004779?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,15]],"date-time":"2025-03-15T09:32:12Z","timestamp":1742031132000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211524004779"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["S0301211524004779"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to cervical ripening balloon as second line of cervical ripening after first dinoprostone insert","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.08.038","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}