{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:47:19Z","timestamp":1740109639375,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,1]],"date-time":"2024-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733011200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004528","name":"Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004528","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,12]],"date-time":"2024-10-12T15:02:13Z","timestamp":1728745333000},"page":"57-62","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Current predictors for morbidity regarding choice of birth after a previous caesarean section, show poor predictive value in prediction modelling"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"303","author":[{"given":"Merel S.F.","family":"van Hees","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sander M.J.","family":"van Kuijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dorothea M.","family":"Koppes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Martijn A.","family":"Oudijk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emy","family":"Vankan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luc J.","family":"Smits","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hubertina C.J.","family":"Scheepers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e005671","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12508","article-title":"Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success","volume":"121","author":"Knight","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","article-title":"Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands","volume":"132","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.05.004","article-title":"Evaluating professional society guidelines on vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"34","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1542-2011.2011.00106.x","article-title":"The importance of mode of birth after previous cesarean: success, satisfaction, and postnatal health","volume":"57","author":"Shorten","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x","article-title":"Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean","volume":"32","author":"Shorten","year":"2005","journal-title":"Birth (Berkeley, Calif)"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12539","article-title":"Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term","volume":"121","author":"Schoorel","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-014-0241-z","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement","volume":"13","author":"Collins","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0145771","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0145771","article-title":"Development and measurement of guidelines-based quality indicators of caesarean section care in the Netherlands: A RAND-modified delphi procedure and retrospective medical chart review","volume":"11","author":"Melman","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0222499","article-title":"The effect of the use of a decision aid with individual risk estimation on the mode of delivery after a caesarean section: A prospective cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Vankan","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2021-0007","article-title":"Nationwide implementation of a decision aid on vaginal birth after cesarean: a before and after cohort study","volume":"49","author":"Koppes","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(96)00236-3","article-title":"A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis","volume":"49","author":"Peduzzi","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1136\/heartjnl-2011-301246","article-title":"Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker","volume":"98","author":"Moons","year":"2012","journal-title":"Heart"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.544426","article-title":"Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome","volume":"31","author":"Madaan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obste Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1266159","article-title":"Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"28","author":"Scifres","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e27.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1028-3","article-title":"Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women","volume":"16","author":"Herstad","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregn Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49","article-title":"New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?","volume":"116","author":"Eden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0110","first-page":"313","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture among women who attempt a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean: a case-control study","volume":"56","author":"Barger","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014","article-title":"Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values","volume":"59","author":"Donders","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0120","series-title":"Fundamentals of Clinical Data Science","first-page":"75","article-title":"Preparing data for predictive modelling","author":"van Kuijk","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0125","series-title":"Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis","first-page":"215","article-title":"Binary logistic regression","author":"Harrell","year":"2001"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1239494","article-title":"Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?","volume":"26","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259313.46842.71","article-title":"Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Srinivas","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1159\/000357757","article-title":"Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"77","author":"Tessmer-Tuck","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70393-9","article-title":"Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"174","author":"Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00531-0","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system","volume":"90","author":"Flamm","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-835961","article-title":"Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one cesarean section: a proposed vaginal birth after cesarean section score","volume":"21","author":"Gonen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0258222","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0258222","article-title":"Surgical complications after caesarean section: A population-based cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Larsson","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chest.2016.05.021","article-title":"Risks of venous thromboembolism after cesarean sections: a meta-analysis","volume":"150","author":"Blondon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Chest"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14408","article-title":"Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study of maternal short-term complications","volume":"101","author":"Dahlquist","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.2217\/WHE.13.17","article-title":"Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders","volume":"9","author":"Memon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.039","article-title":"Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?","volume":"200","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35379-8","article-title":"Validation of a prediction model for predicting the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labour in Quebec","volume":"34","author":"Chaillet","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524005554?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524005554?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]],"date-time":"2024-12-19T23:51:02Z","timestamp":1734652262000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211524005554"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"references-count":37,"alternative-id":["S0301211524005554"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0301-2115"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Current predictors for morbidity regarding choice of birth after a previous caesarean section, show poor predictive value in prediction modelling","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.10.018","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}