{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,17]],"date-time":"2026-04-17T17:36:35Z","timestamp":1776447395030,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,17]],"date-time":"2024-12-17T01:06:02Z","timestamp":1734397562000},"page":"210-217","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Development and internal validation of a model predicting successful trial of labour among pregnant individuals with previous one caesarean section: A cohort study (DEVI-CS model)"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"305","author":[{"given":"Bhabani","family":"Pegu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sathiya Priya","family":"Subburaj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Latha","family":"Chaturvedula","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonali","family":"Sarkar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N. Sreekumaran","family":"Nair","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4881-0382","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anish","family":"Keepanasseril","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.5694\/mja16.00832","article-title":"Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on","volume":"206","author":"Robson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0015","first-page":"1","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights","author":"Guise","year":"2010","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.2217\/17455057.3.1.55","article-title":"Risks and morbidity associated with previous cesarean section","volume":"3","author":"Dodd","year":"2007","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"Sandall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e110\u201327.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0035","series-title":"RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 45: birth after previous caesarean birth","author":"Gynaecologists RCoOa","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.01.014","article-title":"155-guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth","volume":"40","author":"Martel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-118335","article-title":"Labour and childbirth after previous caesarean section: recommendations of the Austrian society of obstetrics and gynaecology (OEGGG)","volume":"76","author":"Reif","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2023.2214831","article-title":"The safety of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) versus elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS): a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Qiu","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"664","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0060","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity","volume":"225","author":"Grobman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03233-y","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"20","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.12.002","article-title":"French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"47","author":"Haumonte","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-017-1031-2","article-title":"Predicting successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery: evaluation of two scoring systems","volume":"68","author":"Patel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000018421","article-title":"Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women","volume":"98","author":"Xu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.13516","article-title":"Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population","volume":"62","author":"Windsor","year":"2022","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0090","article-title":"Validation of Grobman's graphical nomogram for prediction of vaginal delivery in Indian women with previous caesarean section","volume":"18","author":"Bhardwaj","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05385-z","article-title":"Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women","volume":"23","author":"Rawashdeh","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.09.029","article-title":"External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the trial of labour among women with previous one caesarean section \u2013 a cohort study","volume":"291","author":"Pegu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0105","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation","volume":"384","author":"Collins","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0110","article-title":"Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide","volume":"386","author":"Efthimiou","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0115","article-title":"Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 3): calculating the sample size required for an external validation study","volume":"384","author":"Riley","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X06295361","article-title":"Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models","volume":"26","author":"Vickers","year":"2006","journal-title":"Med Decis Making"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"W1","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-0698","article-title":"Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration","volume":"162","author":"Moons","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)31015-X","article-title":"Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean","volume":"35","author":"Chaillet","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bb0dde","article-title":"Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"114","author":"Costantine","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2020-0308","article-title":"External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study","volume":"49","author":"Vankan","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12809","article-title":"Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: validation of a prediction model","volume":"59","author":"Mooney","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/s41512-019-0064-7","article-title":"A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis","volume":"3","author":"Vickers","year":"2019","journal-title":"Diagn Progn Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0155","article-title":"Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model","volume":"368","author":"Riley","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13859","article-title":"Prediction models in obstetrics: understanding the treatment paradox and potential solutions to the threat it poses","volume":"123","author":"Cheong-See","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524007036?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524007036?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]],"date-time":"2025-01-20T15:33:40Z","timestamp":1737387220000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211524007036"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["S0301211524007036"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Development and internal validation of a model predicting successful trial of labour among pregnant individuals with previous one caesarean section: A cohort study (DEVI-CS model)","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.029","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}