{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T09:11:45Z","timestamp":1792746705326,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,1]],"date-time":"2025-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740787200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,1]],"date-time":"2025-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740787200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,6]],"date-time":"2025-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736121600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,31]],"date-time":"2024-12-31T08:00:51Z","timestamp":1735632051000},"page":"29-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp blood sampling: A retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"306","author":[{"given":"Eleanor","family":"Godhard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Flurina","family":"Michelotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8807-0729","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dexter J.L.","family":"Hayes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander E.P.","family":"Heazell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.06.012","article-title":"Evaluating the value of intrapartum fetal scalp blood sampling to predict adverse neonatal outcomes: A UK multicentre observational study","volume":"240","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0010","unstructured":"Comparing fetal scalp lactate and umbilical cord arterial blood gas values - Bowler - 2014 - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Wiley Online Library. https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/ajo.12144."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0015","unstructured":"NICE clinical guidance no. 190; updated Feb 2017. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies [Internet]. https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg190."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.06.006","article-title":"Future perspectives in intrapartum fetal surveillance","volume":"30","author":"Devoe","year":"2016","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0025","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"2017","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography during labour: analysis, classification and management","volume":"30","author":"Pinas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.04.021","article-title":"Fetal heart rate patterns in labor and the risk of neonatal encephalopathy: a case control study","volume":"273","author":"Reynolds","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)30568-8","article-title":"Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"389","author":"Brocklehurst","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4053-6","article-title":"Correlation of fetal scalp blood sampling pH with neonatal outcome umbilical artery pH value","volume":"294","author":"Kuehnle","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0050","unstructured":"Intrapartum Care: NICE Guideline CG190 Interpretation of Cardiotocograph Traces. (2017)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0055","unstructured":"NICE. Fetal monitoring in labour (December 2022). https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng229\/chapter\/Recommendations#fetal-scalp-stimulation (2022)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000008839","article-title":"Accuracy of intrapartum fetal blood gas analysis by scalp sampling","volume":"96","author":"Hilal","year":"2017","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0065","first-page":"315","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp lactate for intrapartum acidosis compared with scalp pH","volume":"45","author":"Mancho","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0070","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fetal monitoring in labour [A] Evidence review for fetal blood sampling. NICE guideline NG229 Evidence review underpinnign recommednation 1.7.1 in the NICE guideline (2022)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12421","article-title":"Fetal scalp blood sampling in labor \u2013 a review","volume":"93","author":"J\u00f8rgensen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1743656","article-title":"Fetal scalp blood sampling during second stage of labor \u2013 analyzing lactate or pH? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"St\u00e5l","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0085","article-title":"Stata statistical software","author":"StataCorp","year":"2017","journal-title":"StataCorp LLC"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(67)90515-7","article-title":"pH values in the human fetus during labor","volume":"97","author":"Bretscher","year":"1967","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0095","first-page":"351","article-title":"Cardiotocography supplemented with continuous fetal pH monitoring during labor. Effect on rate of obstetrical interventions and neonatal condition","volume":"61","author":"Weber","year":"1982","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03335.x","article-title":"The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples","volume":"119","author":"Yeh","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.11.016","article-title":"The reliability of foetal blood sampling as a test of foetal acidosis in labour","volume":"167","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524007139?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211524007139?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,23]],"date-time":"2025-02-23T21:19:22Z","timestamp":1740345562000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211524007139"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["S0301211524007139"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of fetal scalp blood sampling: A retrospective cohort study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.12.039","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}