{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T06:55:17Z","timestamp":1793775317467,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]],"date-time":"2025-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743465600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]],"date-time":"2025-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743465600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,26]],"date-time":"2025-02-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740528000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100004334","name":"Merck","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100004334","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000925","name":"National Health and Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["GNT1176437"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GNT1176437"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,25]],"date-time":"2025-02-25T19:02:57Z","timestamp":1740510177000},"page":"99-111","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"308","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8980-5451","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Holly J.","family":"Giles-Clark","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sasha M.","family":"Skinner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"May M.","family":"Linn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel L.","family":"Rolnik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ben W.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.111720","article-title":"The prediction and prevention of intrapartum fetal asphyxia in term pregnancies","volume":"184","author":"Low","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","article-title":"Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise?","volume":"46","author":"Prior","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0015","first-page":"946","article-title":"Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution","volume":"30","author":"Chukwudi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1186\/s12887-018-1116-9","article-title":"A systematic review comparing neurodevelopmental outcome in term infants with hypoxic and vascular brain injury with and without seizures","volume":"18","author":"De Haan","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pediatr"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002494","article-title":"Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Keag","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.09.035","article-title":"Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth?","volume":"212","author":"Levine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4445-2","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"296","author":"Yang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2006.04.004","article-title":"An Australian prospective cohort study of risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth","volume":"23","author":"Dahlen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-36","article-title":"Vacuum assisted birth and risk for cerebral complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Ek\u00e9us","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2016-0389","article-title":"Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications","volume":"46","author":"Axelsson","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-138","article-title":"Mode of birth and women\u2019s psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period","volume":"12","author":"Rowlands","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMC Pregn Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16566","article-title":"Caesarean birth and risk of subsequent preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Williams","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1251-6","article-title":"Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study","volume":"17","author":"Simic","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregn Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0070","article-title":"Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing","author":"Devane","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E468","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.202538","article-title":"Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","volume":"193","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.018","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring","volume":"131","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1906220","article-title":"Does continuous cardiotocography during labor cause excessive fetal distress diagnosis and unnecessary cesarean sections?","volume":"35","author":"Kale","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0090","article-title":"Counting stillbirths and COVID 19- there has never been a more urgent time","volume":"9","author":"Homer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0095","unstructured":"Australia's mothers and babies- web report: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2022 [Available from: https:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/reports\/mothers-babies\/australias-mothers-babies, access date 4th February 2024]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0100","article-title":"Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation","volume":"7","author":"Middleton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0105","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0110","unstructured":"Giles-Clark H, Skinner S, Linn MM, Rolnik DL, Mol B. A systematic review of prediction models for intrapartum fetal asphyxia; PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021259583 2021 [Available from: https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/prospero\/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021259583]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2023.04.031","article-title":"Should we use composite outcomes in obstetric clinical prediction models?","volume":"285","author":"Giles-Clark","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001744","article-title":"Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist","volume":"11","author":"Moons","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1376","article-title":"PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies","volume":"170","author":"Wolff","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009","article-title":"Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors","volume":"158","author":"Hayden","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12478","article-title":"Pregnancy dating by fetal crown\u2013rump length: a systematic review of charts","volume":"121","author":"Napolitano","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.3945\/an.115.010413","article-title":"Systematic review of the methodological quality of studies aimed at creating gestational weight gain charts","volume":"7","author":"Ohadike","year":"2016","journal-title":"Adv Nutr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20102","article-title":"Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review","volume":"53","author":"Oros","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00652.x","article-title":"Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"19","author":"Severi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820b0884","article-title":"Fetal brain doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"117","author":"Cruz-Mart\u00ednez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01320.x","article-title":"Predictive value of the baseline T-QRS ratio of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a prospective cohort study","volume":"91","author":"Becker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03334.x","article-title":"A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery","volume":"119","author":"Schuit","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12380","article-title":"Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"42","author":"Parra-Saavedra","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14807","article-title":"Cervical condition and fetal cerebral Doppler as determinants of adverse perinatal outcome after labor induction for late-onset small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"46","author":"Garcia-Simon","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14928","article-title":"Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"47","author":"Valino","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15663","article-title":"Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"47","author":"Valino","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14898","article-title":"Uterine artery pulsatility index at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"47","author":"Valino","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18981","article-title":"Prelabor screening for intrapartum fetal compromise in low-risk pregnancies at term: cerebroplacental ratio and placental growth factor","volume":"52","author":"Bligh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","article-title":"Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model","volume":"218","author":"Kalafat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obst Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.03.002","article-title":"Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"221","author":"Akolekar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20346","article-title":"Biomarkers of impaired placentation at 35-37weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"54","author":"Ciobanou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20173","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labor","volume":"53","author":"Fiolna","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1159\/000503387","article-title":"Can the progression angle before labor help to predict cesarean section?","volume":"47","author":"Alzola","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12979","article-title":"Development of a cross-validated model for predicting emergency cesarean for intrapartum fetal compromise at term","volume":"148","author":"Flatley","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21918","article-title":"Maternal cardiovascular function and risk of intrapartum fetal compromise in women undergoing induction of labor: pilot study","volume":"56","author":"Kalafat","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2775","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1560412","article-title":"Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: external validation of the IRIS algorithm","volume":"33","author":"Kalafat","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2816","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1671338","article-title":"Intrapartum prediction of emergency delivery due to non-reassuring fetal status at 40 weeks' gestation in low-risk pregnancies: contribution of Doppler parameters, maternal history, and intrapartum clinical characteristics","volume":"34","author":"Crovetto","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1159\/000517260","article-title":"The diagnostic ability of the cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome and intrapartum fetal compromise within one day of delivery","volume":"86","author":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2021","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1910","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14222","article-title":"Does gestational age at term play a role in the association between cerebroplacental ratio and operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise?","volume":"100","author":"Ortiz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1752657","article-title":"Prelabor short-term variability in fetal heart rate by computerized cardiotocogram and maternal fetal doppler indices for the prediction of labor outcomes","volume":"35","author":"Lam","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1159\/000525162","article-title":"Cerebroplacental ratio prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise according to the interval to delivery","volume":"49","author":"Morales-Rosello","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001727404","article-title":"STAN\u00ae S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients","volume":"15","author":"Kwee","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0270","article-title":"A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance","volume":"356","author":"Debray","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","article-title":"The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses","volume":"213","author":"DeVore","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13064","article-title":"Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines","volume":"96","author":"Santo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-078276","article-title":"Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide","volume":"386","author":"Efthimiou","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052_b0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.01.025","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of sildenafil citrate to reduce operative birth for intrapartum fetal compromise at term: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial","volume":"222","author":"Turner","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525001216?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525001216?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,4]],"date-time":"2025-11-04T19:42:33Z","timestamp":1762285353000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211525001216"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"references-count":58,"alternative-id":["S0301211525001216"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prediction models for intrapartum fetal hypoxia: A systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.02.052","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}