{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,7]],"date-time":"2026-11-07T02:54:53Z","timestamp":1794020093379,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,1]],"date-time":"2025-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754006400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,2]],"date-time":"2025-07-02T11:11:38Z","timestamp":1751454698000},"page":"114560","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"312","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8961-7709","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emmanouil M.","family":"Xydias","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Polyxeni-Natalia","family":"Liasidi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Despoina","family":"Papageorgouli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elias","family":"Tsakos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nikolaos","family":"Gouliopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ioannis","family":"Thanasas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandros","family":"Daponte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Apostolos C.","family":"Ziogas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.4788","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of infertility: a Review","volume":"326","author":"Carson","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","article-title":"Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"29","author":"Venetis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17352","article-title":"Accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detection of endometrial polyps and submucosal leiomyomas in women of reproductive age with abnormal uterine bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"50","author":"Bittencourt","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15968","article-title":"Reproductive implications and management of congenital uterine anomalies: scientific impact paper No. 62 November 2019","volume":"127","author":"Akhtar","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4272","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-020-06750-8","article-title":"MRI of female genital tract congenital anomalies: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines","volume":"30","author":"Maciel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.06.002","article-title":"The diagnostic accuracy of 3D ultrasound compared to 2D ultrasound and MRI in the assessment of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer patients: a systematic review","volume":"61","author":"Ziogas","year":"2022","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2022.08.005","article-title":"Comparison of 3D ultrasound, 2D ultrasound and 3D Doppler in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in patients with uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"277","author":"Xydias","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0040","series-title":"Polycystic Ovary Syndrome","article-title":"Novel methods in the diagnosis of PCOS: the role of 3D ultrasonographic modalities","author":"Ziogas","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2003.09.001","article-title":"Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography","volume":"18","author":"Salim","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0050","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0055","series-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 100","article-title":"Chapter 9: Assessing methodological quality","author":"Reitsma","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1592","DOI":"10.7326\/M21-2234","article-title":"QUADAS-C: a tool for assessing risk of bias in comparative diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"174","author":"Yang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1186\/s13690-021-00747-5","article-title":"Metadta: a Stata command for meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy data \u2013 a tutorial","volume":"80","author":"Nyaga","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","article-title":"Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"McHugh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Biochem Med (Zagreb)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s10742-011-0077-3","article-title":"Meta-analysis of Cohen\u2019s kappa","volume":"11","author":"Sun","year":"2011","journal-title":"Health Serv Outcomes Res Method"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0033-1335664","article-title":"Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations","volume":"35","author":"Imboden","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14825","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract","volume":"46","author":"Graupera","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7551","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"35","author":"Bermejo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.724","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"19","author":"Faivre","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Minimally Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrnm.2014.04.001","article-title":"Septate or bicornuate uterus: Accuracy of three-dimensional trans-vaginal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"45","author":"Abo Dewan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s43055-020-00156-8","article-title":"Role of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies","volume":"51","author":"Abd elsalam","year":"2020","journal-title":"Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1877646","article-title":"The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and its concordance with magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"42","author":"Cekdemir","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3201","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1815189","article-title":"The value of three-dimensional ultrasound in identifying Mullerian anomalies at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"35","author":"Negm","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Mater-Fetal Neonat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.11.010","article-title":"Comparison of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in surgically proven M\u00fcllerian duct anomaly cases","volume":"197","author":"Ergenoglu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10009-1005","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies","volume":"3","author":"Bermejo","year":"2009","journal-title":"Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0135","series-title":"Validacion de la ecografia 3D como tecnica diagnostica de las malformaciones uterinas de origen mulleriano","author":"Graupera","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7","article-title":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, m\u00fcllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions","volume":"49","author":"The American Fertility Society Committee","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","article-title":"The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies","volume":"28","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331020777","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues","volume":"233","author":"Troiano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.09.011","article-title":"Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri","volume":"20","author":"Ludwin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10056","article-title":"Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review","volume":"38","author":"Chan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2008.27.3.413","article-title":"The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature","volume":"27","author":"Deutch","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.183.3.1584936","article-title":"Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography","volume":"183","author":"Pellerito","year":"1992","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0175","first-page":"34","article-title":"A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for m\u00fcllerian tract abnormalities","volume":"40","author":"Letterie","year":"1995","journal-title":"Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-014-0635-z","article-title":"Role of three-dimensional ultrasound in gynecology","volume":"65","author":"Turkgeldi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.002","article-title":"Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome","volume":"30","author":"Kupesi\u0107","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0096(199711\/12)25:9<487::AID-JCU4>3.0.CO;2-J","article-title":"Detection of congenital m\u00fcllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound","volume":"25","author":"Wu","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0195","first-page":"866","article-title":"Comparative study of hysteroscopy and 3D ultrasound for diagnosing uterine cavity abnormalities","volume":"120","author":"Grigore","year":"2016","journal-title":"Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.01.023","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-transvaginal ultrasound in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile patients as compared with hysteroscopy","volume":"200","author":"Apirakviriya","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.127","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"21","author":"Salim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152500836X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152500836X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,25]],"date-time":"2025-07-25T14:30:33Z","timestamp":1753453833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121152500836X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"references-count":41,"alternative-id":["S030121152500836X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114560","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"114560"}}