{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T03:40:07Z","timestamp":1789184407182,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,7]],"date-time":"2025-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751846400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,7]],"date-time":"2025-07-07T11:12:27Z","timestamp":1751886747000},"page":"114567","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Correlation between clinical and sonographic assessment of the fetal head station in the second stage of labor: a prospective observational study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"313","author":[{"given":"Andrea","family":"Dall\u2019Asta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Angeli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ariane","family":"Kiener","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valentina Anna","family":"Degennaro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elvira","family":"Di Pasquo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Morganelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Veronica","family":"Falcone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marinunzia","family":"Salluce","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Priscilla","family":"Bontempo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Melito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Corno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maurizio Di","family":"Serio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefania","family":"Fieni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tullio","family":"Ghi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murphy DJ, Strachan BK, Bahl R; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26.BJOG. 2020;127(9):e70-e112. doi:10.1111\/1471-0528.16092.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16092"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e149","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003764","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 219","volume":"135","author":"Operative Vaginal Birth","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.09.028","article-title":"Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification","volume":"192","author":"Dupuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.11.020","article-title":"Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station","volume":"101","author":"Buchmann","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6322","article-title":"Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8944","article-title":"Relationship between fetal head station established using an open magnetic resonance imaging scanner and the angle of progression determined by transperineal ultrasound","volume":"37","author":"Bamberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21913","article-title":"Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome","volume":"55","author":"Frick","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13251","article-title":"Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head-perineum distance","volume":"97","author":"Benediktsdottir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1064","article-title":"Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography","volume":"24","author":"Akmal","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","article-title":"A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Barbera","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","article-title":"A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent","volume":"118","author":"Tutschek","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.07.013","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"12","author":"von Elm","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. J. Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043","article-title":"Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"159","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"870","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.10.020","article-title":"381-Assisted Vaginal Birth","volume":"41","author":"Hobson","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0080","unstructured":"The Women\u2019s Health Committee. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Instrumental vaginal birth (C-Obs-16). 2016."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1765","article-title":"Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique","volume":"25","author":"Dietz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6313","article-title":"Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Ghi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12422","article-title":"Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor","volume":"41","author":"Tutschek","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7521","article-title":"Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise","volume":"35","author":"D\u00fcckelmann","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1963","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1651283","article-title":"Structured clinical examinations in labor: rekindling the craft of obstetrics","volume":"34","author":"Iversen","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14236","article-title":"Ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"100","author":"Mappa","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1011","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12454","article-title":"Fetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor","volume":"93","author":"Youssef","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2022.100827","article-title":"Head-to-perineum distance measured transperineally as a predictor of failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery","volume":"5","author":"Nallet","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"6S","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0125","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery","volume":"3","author":"Chan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.02.035","article-title":"Intrapartum sonographic assessment of the fetal head flexion in protracted active phase of labor and association with labor outcome: a multicenter, prospective study","volume":"225","author":"Dall'Asta","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","article-title":"Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction","volume":"28","author":"Henrich","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06469-5","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"307","author":"Katzir","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.07.031","article-title":"Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: asystematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"226","author":"Nassr","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000237116.72011.f3","article-title":"Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Alexander","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0155","first-page":"955","article-title":"Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage","volume":"92","author":"Donnelly","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.040","article-title":"Infectious morbidity is higher after second-stage compared with first-stage cesareans","volume":"211","author":"Tuuli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.005","article-title":"Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"197","author":"Sung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007","article-title":"Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events","volume":"214","author":"Bailit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"9289","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199912023412301","article-title":"Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury","volume":"341","author":"Towner","year":"1999","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.12.015","article-title":"Intrapartum sonographic features of cephalopelvic disproportion in occiput anterior fetuses diagnosed with protracted active phase of labor","volume":"270","author":"Dall'Asta","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12342","article-title":"Intrapartum assessment of caput succedaneum by transperineal ultrasound: a two-centre pilot study","volume":"55","author":"Hassan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0205","first-page":"459","article-title":"Caput succedaneum thickness in prolonged second stage of labour: a clinical evaluation","volume":"53","author":"Gilboa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13324","article-title":"Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery","volume":"44","author":"Ghi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falcone V, Dall'Asta A, Romano A, Mappa I, Geron Y, Bontempo P, Salluce M, Di Pasquo E, Morganelli G, Di Serio M, Fieni S, Gilboa Y, Rizzo G, Ghi T. Vacuum extraction is successful in 95% of cases with an occiput posterior position: the results of a prospective, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 20:S0002-9378(24)01200-6. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.12.022. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39710223.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.12.022"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525008437?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525008437?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T12:28:29Z","timestamp":1770985709000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211525008437"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"references-count":43,"alternative-id":["S0301211525008437"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Correlation between clinical and sonographic assessment of the fetal head station in the second stage of labor: a prospective observational study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114567","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"114567"}}