{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,26]],"date-time":"2026-08-26T06:34:01Z","timestamp":1787726041663,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T23:44:58Z","timestamp":1767051898000},"page":"114925","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Does the abdominal entry method in laparoscopy really matter? A network meta-analysis of rare events in randomized trials"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"318","author":[{"given":"Barbara","family":"Gardella","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6322-607X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mattia","family":"Dominoni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Cassani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martina Rita","family":"Pano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cristina Angela","family":"Camnasio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arsenio","family":"Spinillo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.04.047","article-title":"French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. risks associated with laparoscopic entry: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"158","author":"Deffieux","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Laberge PY, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Scattolon S, Leyland N. Guideline No. 412: Laparoscopic Entry for Gynaecological Surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021; 43(3):376-389.e1. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021;43(9):1120-1121.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.07.006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0015","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries. Green Top Guideline n. 49. 2008."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0020","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry techniques","volume":"1(1):CD006583","author":"Ahmad","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2020.07.010","article-title":"Clinical Perspective concerning Abdominal Entry Techniques","volume":"28","author":"Recknagel","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2331","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-016-3527-9","article-title":"Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. a Systematic Review of the Literature","volume":"40","author":"Cornette","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004280","article-title":"Laparoscopic Major Vascular Injuries in Gynecologic Surgery for Benign Indications: a Systematic Review","volume":"137","author":"King","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.06.023","article-title":"Complications Related to the initial Trocar Insertion of 3 Different Techniques: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"26","author":"Nishimura","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0045","article-title":"Primary entry trocar design and entry-related complications at laparoscopy in obese patients: meta-analysis","volume":"7(3):zrad047","author":"Miti","year":"2023","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-023-02891-8","article-title":"Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"408","author":"Taliento","year":"2023","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0055","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of Veress needle entry versus direct trocar entry in gynecologic surgery","volume":"4","author":"Marchand","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14412","article-title":"Laparoscopic entry techniques: which should you prefer?","volume":"160","author":"Raimondo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0065","article-title":"Closed (Verres needle) vs. Open (Hasson cannula) Approach to Creating Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in patients with No previous Abdominal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"101634","author":"Venkatachalapathi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Curr Probl Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1136\/eb-2018-102911","article-title":"Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events","volume":"21","author":"Efthimiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Evid Based Ment Health"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.6383","article-title":"Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless","volume":"34","author":"Kuss","year":"2015","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmental-2019-300103","article-title":"Statistics in pills: meta-analysis of rare events","volume":"22","author":"Efthimiou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Evid Based Ment Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.2528","article-title":"Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events","volume":"26","author":"Bradburn","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1370","article-title":"Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events","volume":"11","author":"G\u00fcnhan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"26","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5203","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.9562","article-title":"Network meta-analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression","volume":"41","author":"Evrenoglou","year":"2022","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/s11739-016-1583-7","article-title":"Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians","volume":"12","author":"Rouse","year":"2017","journal-title":"Intern Emerg Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-2385","article-title":"The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations","volume":"162","author":"Hutton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0110","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1080","DOI":"10.1002\/cl2.1080","article-title":"CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Papakonstantinou","year":"2020","journal-title":"Campbell Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350610393989","article-title":"Laparoscopy entry in patients with previous abdominal and pelvic surgery","volume":"18","author":"Tinelli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13167","article-title":"The Veress needle causes most laparoscopic injuries and should be abandoned: FOR: the open technique is safer and saves time","volume":"122","author":"Vindal","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13166","article-title":"AGAINST: evidence indicates that the primary trocar, not the Veress, causes most serious complications","volume":"122","author":"Vilos","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Laberge PY, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Scattolon S, Leyland N. Guideline No. 412: Laparoscopic Entry for Gynaecological Surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 202;43(3):376-389.e1. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021;43(9):1120-1121.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.07.006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925_b0140","unstructured":"Green-top Guideline N.49. Preventing entry-related laparoscopic injuries. RCOG 2008."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525012011?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211525012011?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T11:25:37Z","timestamp":1779449137000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211525012011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["S0301211525012011"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Does the abdominal entry method in laparoscopy really matter? A network meta-analysis of rare events in randomized trials","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114925","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"114925"}}