{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T13:25:47Z","timestamp":1787923547134,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782864000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,17]],"date-time":"2026-05-17T22:55:30Z","timestamp":1779058530000},"page":"115197","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Uterine exteriorization versus in-situ uterine repair during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"323","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-9162-5335","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura","family":"Fonseca Queiroz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria Julia","family":"Lemos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Davi","family":"Barbosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanna","family":"Martin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayesha","family":"Ayesha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rodrigo","family":"Ruano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-015-0448-2","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"62","author":"Zaphiratos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Can JAnaesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.043","article-title":"Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review","volume":"209","author":"Dahlke","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0015","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair at cesarean section","volume":"2","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6894","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17186894","article-title":"The health impact of surgical techniques and assistive methods used in cesarean deliveries: a systemic review","volume":"17","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0025","article-title":"Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at cesarean section","volume":"4","author":"Jacobs-Jokhan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2022.103271","article-title":"Uterine externalization versus in situ repair of hysterotomy during cesarean delivery: a systematic review, equivalence meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis","volume":"50","author":"Bhat","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0035","first-page":"814","article-title":"Exteriorization and intraperitoneal closure of uterus in cesarean delivery: a comparative study","volume":"15","author":"Patil","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int J Pharm Clin Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0040","first-page":"1214","article-title":"Comparative analysis of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair during cesarean section at a tertiary care center","volume":"6","author":"Navyashree","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int J Med Pharm Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0045","first-page":"QC06","article-title":"Influence of exteriorised versus intra-abdominal uterine repair in caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative complications","volume":"17","author":"Mukherjee","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0050","first-page":"1236","article-title":"A comparative study of merits and demerits of exteriorization of uterus during cesarean delivery","volume":"15","author":"Mohanty","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Dis Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0055","first-page":"192","article-title":"Comparison between uterine exteriorization and in-situ repair of uterus in caesarean section","volume":"34","author":"Mohmed","year":"2023","journal-title":"MJMR"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0060","series-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions","year":"2019"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0070","unstructured":"Uterine Exteriorization Versus In-situ Uterine Repair During Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Registration number CRD420251250171. Registered on December 9th, 2025. Available from: https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/view\/CRD420251250171. Accessed December 12th, 2025."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0075","article-title":"RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials","volume":"366","author":"Sterne","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7650","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7109","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0090","article-title":"Trustworthiness in randomized trials (TRACT) checklist: a tool to assess trial integrity","volume":"3","author":"Farrow","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMJ Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x","article-title":"A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis","volume":"172","author":"Higgins","year":"2009","journal-title":"J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0100","unstructured":"R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2025.09.1+401. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2025. Available from: https:\/\/www.r-project.org\/."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0105","first-page":"544","article-title":"Comparison of inferior vena cava\u2011collapsibility index of uterine exteriorization versus in\u2011situ repair in elective lower segment cesarean section","volume":"6","author":"Shobha","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Acad Med Pharm"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0110","first-page":"UC20","article-title":"Comparison between intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal repair of the uterus with relation to intraoperative haemodynamic changes in patients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia: a cohort study","volume":"14","author":"Rai","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0115","first-page":"1103","article-title":"Complications of exteriorized versus in situ uterine repair during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia in a tertiary care centre","volume":"15","author":"Raja Priya","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Dis Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0120","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization vs. in situ repair of cesarean section: a comparative study at a tertiary care hospital","volume":"9","author":"Kumari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Pak J Med Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-2186-1","article-title":"Comparison of uterine exteriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections","volume":"285","author":"Gode","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0130","article-title":"Comparison of exteriorized with in-situ uterine repair in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study","author":"Farooqi","year":"2025","journal-title":"Res Square"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0135","article-title":"Comparison of the intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal techniques in the repair of cesarean section incision","author":"Fariso\u011fullar\u0131","year":"2022","journal-title":"Res Square"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.11648\/j.jgo.20251301.11","article-title":"Prognosis of caesarean section with or without externalization of the uterus at the CHU Ignace Deen, Guinea","volume":"13","author":"Bah","year":"2025","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0145","first-page":"615","article-title":"Uterine repair with exteriorisation or in situ at caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"4","author":"Xiong","year":"2004","journal-title":"Chinese J Evidence-Based Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08429.x","article-title":"A randomised, controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section","volume":"106","author":"Wahab","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22","article-title":"Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl-2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S191","DOI":"10.51253\/pafmj.v65iSUPPL-2.12516","article-title":"Comparison of intra-operative and post-operative complications of intra-abdominal versus extra-abdominal uterine repair at caesarean delivery","volume":"65","author":"Shuja","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pak Armed Forces Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0165","first-page":"276","article-title":"Uterine incision repair by exteriorization versus in situ at caesarean section: effect on blood loss and operative time","volume":"16","author":"Saleem","year":"2022","journal-title":"APMC"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0170","first-page":"155","article-title":"Exteriorized versus in-situ repair of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"38","author":"\u00d6zbay","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00902.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section","volume":"48","author":"Orji","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0180","first-page":"1522","article-title":"Different techniques for uterine repair during C-section: randomized controlled trial","volume":"14","author":"Noor","year":"2020","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.10.009","article-title":"Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial","volume":"16","author":"Nafisi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0190","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","author":"Mohr-Sasson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003821","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair of hysterotomy after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"135","author":"Mireault","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1155\/S106474499300016X","article-title":"Does method of placental removal or site of uterine incision repair alter endometritis after cesarean delivery?","volume":"1","author":"Magann","year":"1993","journal-title":"Infect DisObstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"31","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0205","first-page":"97","article-title":"Exteriorization of uterus versus intrabdominal uterine closure at caesarean delivery","volume":"15","author":"Lamichhane","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nep J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.37185\/Lns.1.1.185","article-title":"Comparison of primary outcomes in extra\u2011abdominal versus intra\u2011abdominal uterine repair at caesarean section: a comparative study","volume":"3","author":"Kashif","year":"2022","journal-title":"Life Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0215","article-title":"Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section","volume":"52","author":"Hershey","year":"1978","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4314\/wajm.v24i1.28161","article-title":"Uterine incision closure at caesarean section: a randomised comparative study of intraperitoneal closure and closure after temporary exteriorisation","volume":"24","author":"Ezechi","year":"2005","journal-title":"West Afr J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.21608\/amj.2022.230461","article-title":"Comparison between uterine exteriorization and in-situ repair of uterus in caesarean section","volume":"51","author":"Elwany","year":"2022","journal-title":"Al-Azhar Med J (Surg)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09938.x","article-title":"Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section: influence on maternal morbidity","volume":"105","author":"Edi-Osagie","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.009","article-title":"Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of cesarean delivery","volume":"111","author":"Do\u011fanay","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0240","first-page":"5","article-title":"Comparative study of uterine repair during caesarean section \u2013 intra-abdominal vs exteriorisation of uterus","volume":"14","author":"Das","year":"2015","journal-title":"IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS)"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816521e2","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Coutinho","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20175862","article-title":"A randomized comparative study of exteriorization of uterus versus in situ intra-peritoneal repair at cesarean delivery","volume":"7","author":"Chauhan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00729.x","article-title":"The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss","volume":"84","author":"Baksu","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0260","first-page":"131","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair: effect on intraoperative nausea and vomiting during repeat cesarean delivery \u2013 a randomized clinical trial","volume":"7","author":"Abdellah","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0265","first-page":"234","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"381","author":"Abalos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-021-02142-8","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"69","author":"Tan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Can JAnesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-08151-y","article-title":"Single-versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery and risk of uterine scar niche: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"312","author":"Dominoni","year":"2025","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"346","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0280","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study)","volume":"231","author":"Verberkt","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstetr Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0285","first-page":"517","article-title":"Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair","volume":"181","author":"Magann","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197_b0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.05.004","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery","volume":"127","author":"El-Khayat","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526002654?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526002654?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,28]],"date-time":"2026-08-28T12:42:59Z","timestamp":1787920979000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526002654"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"references-count":58,"alternative-id":["S0301211526002654"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Uterine exteriorization versus in-situ uterine repair during cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115197","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115197"}}