{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,13]],"date-time":"2026-07-13T21:10:50Z","timestamp":1783977050887,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785542400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785542400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781568000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T23:09:46Z","timestamp":1781737786000},"page":"115258","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Impact of a detailed ultrasound in pregnancies with high-risk cell-free DNA for common autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"324","author":[{"given":"Elena","family":"D\u2019Alberti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara","family":"Sorrenti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karl Oliver","family":"Kagan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria M.","family":"Gil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Zullo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paola","family":"Grammatico","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Pizzuti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonella","family":"Giancotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6560-3393","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniele","family":"Di Mascio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1336","DOI":"10.1038\/ejhg.2008.122","article-title":"Twenty-year trends in prevalence and survival of Down syndrome","volume":"16","author":"Irving","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.4.777","article-title":"Population-based analyses of mortality in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18","volume":"111","author":"Rasmussen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17484","article-title":"Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis","volume":"50","author":"Gil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17483","article-title":"ISUOG updated consensus statement on the impact of cfDNA aneuploidy testing on screening policies and prenatal ultrasound practice","volume":"49","author":"Salomon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.27470","article-title":"Role of late first-trimester ultrasound in women with a positive NIPT result","volume":"62","author":"Han","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4659","article-title":"The type of feto-placental aneuploidy detected by cfDNA testing may influence the choice of confirmatory diagnostic procedure","volume":"35","author":"Grati","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1586\/14737159.2016.1152890","article-title":"Cytogenetic confirmation of a positive NIPT result: evidence-based choice between chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis depending on chromosome aberration","volume":"16","author":"Van Opstal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Expert Rev Mol Diagn"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15762","article-title":"Synthesizing evidence from diagnostic accuracy TEsts: the SEDATE guideline","volume":"47","author":"Sotiriadis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.19163","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: The PRISMA-DTA statement","volume":"319","author":"McInnes","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salameh JP, Bossuyt PM, McGrath TA, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ. 2020;370:m2632. Published 2020 Aug 14. doi:10.1136\/bmj.m2632.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m2632"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0060","unstructured":"Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y.Cochrane Handbookfor Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.Version 09 0. The CochraneCollaboration: London, UK, 2010; 83."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","article-title":"QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies","volume":"155","author":"Whiting","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Int Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0651-0459","article-title":"Follow-up studies of cf-DNA testing from 101 consecutive fetuses and related ultrasound findings. ultraschallbefunde und follow-up-Untersuchungen nach 101 auff\u00e4lligen nicht-invasiven Pr\u00e4nataltests (NIPT)","volume":"41","author":"Basaran","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.09.012","article-title":"The role of ultrasound in women with a positive NIPT result for trisomy 18 and 13","volume":"58","author":"Zhen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1474","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5799","article-title":"Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with first trimester ultrasound anomalies and a low-risk cell-free DNA test for common trisomies","volume":"40","author":"Persico","year":"2020","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1226-6538","article-title":"Testing in Routine Practice: Characterisation of a Cohort with Positive Results for Trisomies, Sex Chromosome Anomalies and Microdeletions","volume":"81","author":"Tekesin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15115","article-title":"The role of first-trimester ultrasound screening for women with positive noninvasive prenatal testing results","volume":"48","author":"Saito","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-22-6343","article-title":"The role of non-invasive prenatal testing and ultrasound in prenatal screening of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in singleton: a retrospective study","volume":"11","author":"Yuan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26272","article-title":"Late first-trimester ultrasound findings can alter management after high-risk NIPT result","volume":"62","author":"Scott","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07311-2","article-title":"Importance of a detailed anomaly scan after a cfDNA test indicating fetal trisomy 21, 18 or 13","volume":"310","author":"Spingler","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15945","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis","volume":"48","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gim.2022.03.019","article-title":"Systematic evidence-based review: the application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies","volume":"24","author":"Rose","year":"2022","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4483","article-title":"Increased risk after noninvasive prenatal screening on cell-free DNA circulating in maternal blood: does a new indication for invasive prenatal diagnosis require new criteria for confirmatory cytogenetic analysis?","volume":"35","author":"Grati","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4805","article-title":"Patient choice and clinical outcomes following positive noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy with cell-free DNA (cfDNA)","volume":"36","author":"Dobson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15975","article-title":"Implications of fetoplacental mosaicism on cell-free DNA testing: a review of a common biological phenomenon","volume":"48","author":"Grati","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/tog.12850","article-title":"Pitfalls of prenatal diagnosis associated with mosaicism","volume":"25","author":"Reilly","year":"2023","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41431-018-0244-x","article-title":"European guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic analysis","volume":"27","author":"Silva","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"909","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.3915","article-title":"Completely discrepant results between prenatal QF-PCR rapid aneuploidy testing and cultured cell karyotyping obtained from CVS: lessons from UK audit and re-audit of 22,221 cases","volume":"32","author":"Hamilton","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.11.1240","article-title":"Placental, maternal, fetal, and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results","volume":"230","author":"Raymond","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1249","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.6021","article-title":"Diagnostic testing after positive results on cell free DNA screening: CVS or Amnio?","volume":"41","author":"Mardy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.5788","article-title":"The importance of ultrasound preceding cell-free DNA screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"40","author":"Brown","year":"2020","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.26106","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan","volume":"61","author":"Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152600326X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S030121152600326X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,13]],"date-time":"2026-07-13T20:29:37Z","timestamp":1783974577000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S030121152600326X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"references-count":33,"alternative-id":["S030121152600326X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of a detailed ultrasound in pregnancies with high-risk cell-free DNA for common autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115258","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115258"}}