{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:39:34Z","timestamp":1792528774600,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T16:31:15Z","timestamp":1782923475000},"page":"115283","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparing effectiveness of sacrospinous hysteropexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5127-1423","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tess","family":"Gao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erika","family":"Wasenda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carolyn","family":"Botros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ricardo","family":"Caraballo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Rutledge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shaun","family":"Adair","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-05018-z","article-title":"International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs","volume":"33","author":"Brown","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","article-title":"Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery","volume":"123","author":"Wu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667","article-title":"Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"19","author":"Frick","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3291-x","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes","volume":"28","author":"Kapoor","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Meriwether","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0035","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"351","author":"Detollenaere","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0040","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial","volume":"366","author":"Schulten","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0336-6","article-title":"The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"18","author":"Dietz","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920170017","article-title":"Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?","volume":"12","author":"Maher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12678","article-title":"Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy","volume":"41","author":"Lo","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","article-title":"Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept","volume":"188","author":"Hefni","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.5213\/inj.2244076.038","article-title":"Bilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy versus bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for apical uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"26","author":"Wang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int Neurourol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae","article-title":"Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"114","author":"Barber","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003519?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003519?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:02:56Z","timestamp":1792526576000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526003519"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":14,"alternative-id":["S0301211526003519"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparing effectiveness of sacrospinous hysteropexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115283","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115283"}}