{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:39:27Z","timestamp":1792528767619,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T15:47:56Z","timestamp":1783352876000},"page":"115290","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Brushing versus curettage: Which is the best sampling mode in potmenopausal women with suspected endocervical pathology?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6599-462X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jes\u00fas Joaqu\u00edn","family":"Hijona El\u00f3segui","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Teresa Rodr\u00edguez","family":"Hijona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3735-3472","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"\u00c1ngela Ortu\u00f1o","family":"Blanco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonio Luis","family":"Carballo Garc\u00eda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana Cristina","family":"Fern\u00e1ndez R\u00edsquez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jes\u00fas Carlos","family":"Presa Lorite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.114712","article-title":"Beyond the transformation zone: outcomes in the management of CGIN over five years","volume":"314","author":"McKeown","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mitric C, Lakabi R, Kligun G, Matanes E, Lau S, Gotlieb WH, Salvador S. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;43(1):2162866. https:\/\/doi: 10.1080\/01443615.2022.2162866.","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2022.2162866"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Damkj\u00e6r M, Laursen JB, Petersen LK, Schledermann D, Booth BB, Dolleris BB, Laursen HS, Schroll JB. Endocervical sampling in women with suspectedcervical neoplasia: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):839-848.e4. https:\/\/doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.036..","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.07.036"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0020","unstructured":"Laursen JB, Schroll JB, Petersen LK, Kirschner B, Schledermann D, Laursen HS, Dolleris BB, Booth BB. Choice of method for endocervical sampling in women with suspected neoplasia- a systematic review. Available at: https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/PROSPERO\/view\/CRD42021222406. (Accessed on June 28, 2026)."},{"issue":"308","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.03.017","article-title":"Risk of cervical stenosis after cervical excision in postmenopausal patients","volume":"17","author":"Hauge","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pathol.2025.08.001","article-title":"Cytology and histology of endocervical glandular lesions: a review with emphasis on recent developments","volume":"57","author":"Banet","year":"2025","journal-title":"Pathology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):87-108. doi: 10.1002\/ijgo.7027PMID: 40908766; PMCID: PMC12411820.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.70277"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goksedef BP, Api M, Kaya O, Gorgen H, Tarlaci A, Cetin A. Diagnostic accuracy of two endocervical sampling method: randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):117-22. https:\/\/doi: 10.1007\/s00404-012-2542-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2542-9"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klam S, Arseneau J, Mansour N, Franco E, Ferenczy A. Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;96(1):90-4. https:\/\/doi: 10.1016\/s0029-7844(00)00836-x.","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200007000-00019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mogensen ST, Bak M, Dueholm M, Frost L, Knoblauch NO, Praest J, Svanholm H. Cytobrush and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of dysplasia and malignancy of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Jan;76(1):69-73. https:\/\/doi: 10.3109\/00016349709047788.","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709047788"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bentley J; Executive Council of the Society of Canadian Colposcopists; special contributors. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Dec;34(12):1188-1202. https:\/\/doi: 10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35468-8.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35468-8"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0060","first-page":"440","article-title":"Improving the cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal papanicolaou test","volume":"78","author":"Gosewehr","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, Huh WK, Kim JJ, Moscicki AB, Nayar R, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M; 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines Committee. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000525. Erratum in: J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Oct;24(4):427. https:\/\/doi: 10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000563.","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0000000000000525"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0070","unstructured":"Feltmate CM, Feldman S. Colposcopy. In: UpToDate, Post TW (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on June 28, 2026)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shepherd JP, Guido R, Lowder JL. Should endocervical curettage routinely be performed at the time of colposcopy? A cost-effectiveness analysis. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Apr;18(2):101-8. https:\/\/doi: 10.1097\/LGT.0b013e3182a0b572.","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e3182a0b572"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gage JC, Duggan MA, Nation JG, Gao S, Castle PE. Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):481.e1-9. https:\/\/doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.048.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.048"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ren H, Jia M, Zhao S, Li H, Fan S. Factors Correlated with the Accuracy of Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022 Feb;35(2):284-292. https:\/\/doi: 10.1080\/08941939.2020.1850944.","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2020.1850944"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003581?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003581?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:02:12Z","timestamp":1792526532000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526003581"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":17,"alternative-id":["S0301211526003581"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Brushing versus curettage: Which is the best sampling mode in potmenopausal women with suspected endocervical pathology?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115290","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115290"}}