{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:39:32Z","timestamp":1792528772500,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T23:21:54Z","timestamp":1783639314000},"page":"115303","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparative efficacy of tube-sparing interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1233-9039","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Can","family":"Shi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Han","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tianqi","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanan","family":"Yan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shuai","family":"Yuan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ting","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0005","article-title":"Overview of ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, management, and innovation","volume":"15","author":"Mullany","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1465","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines13061465","article-title":"Tubal ectopic pregnancy: from diagnosis to treatment","volume":"13","author":"Papageorgiou","year":"2025","journal-title":"Biomedicines."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0015","article-title":"Clinical management and outcomes of ectopic pregnancies: experience from Sohar Hospital over three years","volume":"17","author":"Samad","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15965","article-title":"Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"168","author":"Brim","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstetr"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmaf024","article-title":"The diagnosis and management of extrauterine and uterine ectopic pregnancy","volume":"32","author":"Farren","year":"2026","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0030","first-page":"599","article-title":"Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management","volume":"101","author":"Hendriks","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0035","first-page":"1469","article-title":"Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a network meta-analysis","volume":"130","author":"Al Wattar","year":"2023","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0040","article-title":"Evidence gaps in ectopic pregnancy management","volume":"15","author":"Mullany","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus."},{"issue":"10377","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(22)02478-3","article-title":"Combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"401","author":"Horne","year":"2023","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medcli.2016.02.025","article-title":"The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA","volume":"147","author":"Hutton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med Clin (Barc)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0055","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3. 2022."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003082","article-title":"CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"Nikolakopoulou","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0065","first-page":"e1080","article-title":"CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Papakonstantinou","year":"2020","journal-title":"Campbell Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016","article-title":"Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial","volume":"64","author":"Salanti","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.11.055","article-title":"Comparison of success rates in the medical management of ectopic pregnancy with single-dose and multiple-dose administration of methotrexate: a prospective, randomized clinical trial","volume":"85","author":"Alleyassin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0080","first-page":"189","article-title":"Fertility outcome after treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy with two different methotrexate protocols","volume":"6","author":"Tabatabaii Bafghi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57291-4","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingotomy in ectopic pregnancy","volume":"63","author":"Fernandez","year":"1995","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3239","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.11.3239","article-title":"Randomized trial of conservative laparoscopic treatment and methotrexate administration in ectopic pregnancy and subsequent fertility","volume":"13","author":"Fernandez","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1987","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.7.1987","article-title":"Mifepristone in combination with methotrexate for the medical treatment of tubal pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"13","author":"Gazvani","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00370-5","article-title":"Methotrexate prophylaxis for persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative treatment by salpingostomy","volume":"89","author":"Graczykowski","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.486825","article-title":"Comparison of single and multiple dose methotrexate therapy for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy: a prospective randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Guvendag Guven","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.08.009","article-title":"Comparison of double- and single-dose methotrexate protocols for treatment of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"116","author":"Hamed","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17329","article-title":"Single-dose systemic methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a placebo-controlled randomized trial","volume":"49","author":"Jurkovic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60520-8","article-title":"Intratubal methotrexate for prevention of persistent ectopic pregnancy after salpingotomy","volume":"9","author":"Kaya","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.12669\/pjms.38.6.5251","article-title":"Treatment success with two doses of methotrexate vs single dose of methotrexate in Ectopic Tubal Pregnancy","volume":"38","author":"Khakwani","year":"2022","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56040-3","article-title":"Comparison of a local injection of hyperosmolar glucose solution with salpingostomy for the conservative treatment of tubal pregnancy","volume":"60","author":"Laatikainen","year":"1993","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.3109\/00016340903188912","article-title":"Success and spontaneous pregnancy rates following systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancies: a randomized trial","volume":"88","author":"Moeller","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57019-8","article-title":"Intra-amniotic methotrexate versus CO2 laser laparoscopic salpingotomy in the management of tubal ectopic pregnancy\u2014a prospective randomized trial","volume":"62","author":"O'Shea","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1802","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg344","article-title":"Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate\u2013mifepristone and methotrexate-placebo","volume":"18","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5812\/ircmj.20147","article-title":"Comparison of two different protocols of methotrexate therapy in medical management of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"17","author":"Saadati","year":"2015","journal-title":"Iran Red Crescent Med J."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1007\/s004040000149","article-title":"Methotrexate versus hyperosmolar glucose in the treatment of extrauterine pregnancy","volume":"265","author":"Sadan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0160","first-page":"989","article-title":"Resolution of hormonal markers of ectopic gestation: a randomized trial comparing single-dose intramuscular methotrexate with salpingostomy","volume":"92","author":"Saraj","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3513-0","article-title":"Effectiveness of expectant management versus methotrexate in tubal ectopic pregnancy: a double-blind randomized trial","volume":"291","author":"Silva","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0170","first-page":"332","article-title":"Single-dose versus two-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Song","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0175","first-page":"192","article-title":"A randomised trial comparing single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy","volume":"108","author":"Sowter","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des373","article-title":"Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison","volume":"28","author":"van Mello","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0185","first-page":"586","article-title":"Comparison of single and multidose of methotrexate in medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"24","author":"Zargar","year":"2008","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1053\/ob.1996.v175.a74249","article-title":"Laparoscopic salpingostomy versus laparoscopic local methotrexate injection in the management of unruptured ectopic gestation","volume":"175","author":"Zilber","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)57055-1","article-title":"Treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy with methotrexate: pharmacokinetic analysis of local versus intramuscular administration","volume":"62","author":"Fernandez","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0200","first-page":"378","article-title":"The effective role of adding letrozole to methotrexate in the management of tubal ectopic pregnancies, a randomized clinical trial","volume":"20","author":"Rezaei","year":"2021","journal-title":"Iran J Pharm Res."},{"issue":"9080","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)05487-1","article-title":"Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy","volume":"350","author":"Hajenius","year":"1997","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2729","DOI":"10.53350\/pjmhs2115102729","article-title":"Comparison of successful outcome in medical versus expectant management in patients with unruptured tubal pregnancy having B-Hcg 1000-3000 IU\/L","volume":"15","author":"Malik","year":"2021","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0215","first-page":"223","article-title":"Evaluating single-dose methotrexate alone versus methotrexate with letrozole for treating ectopic pregnancy: a comparative study","volume":"311","author":"Ay\u011far","year":"2025","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.53350\/pjmhs202317498","article-title":"Outcome with methotrexate versus expectant management for ectopic pregnancy","volume":"17","author":"Sattar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci."},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.05.021","article-title":"Is a single-dose or two-dose methotrexate protocol more effective in treating an ectopic pregnancy after IVF? [abstract]","volume":"116","author":"Oliva","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54241-1","article-title":"Conservative management of ectopic pregnancy: prospective randomized clinical trial of methotrexate versus prostaglandin sulprostone by combined transvaginal and systemic administration","volume":"55","author":"Fernandez","year":"1991","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"6 Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.08.112","article-title":"Conservative surgery and methotrexate versus methotrexate therapy alone in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial [abstract]","volume":"17","author":"Fernandez","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol."},{"issue":"8707","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(90)91593-Y","article-title":"Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy with local injection of hyperosmolar glucose solution or prostaglandin-F2\u03b1: a prospective randomised study","volume":"336","author":"Lang","year":"1990","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14617","article-title":"Methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis","volume":"102","author":"Solangon","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"issue":"9927","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1483","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60123-9","article-title":"Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial","volume":"383","author":"Mol","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elson CJ, Salim R, Potdar N, Chetty M, Ross JA, Kirk EJ. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: green-top guideline No. 21. BJOG. 2016;123(13):e15-55.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14189"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0260","article-title":"Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy","volume":"1","author":"Hajenius","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0265","first-page":"778","article-title":"The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing 'single dose' and 'multidose' regimens","volume":"101","author":"Barnhart","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0270","article-title":"The effect of laparoscopic and abdominal surgery on the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"11","author":"Zhai","year":"2024","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.7.1804","article-title":"Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy","volume":"13","author":"Mol","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303_b0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000832","article-title":"Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: a comparative review of major national guidelines","volume":"75","author":"Tsakiridis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003714?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003714?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:02:47Z","timestamp":1792526567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526003714"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":56,"alternative-id":["S0301211526003714"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparative efficacy of tube-sparing interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115303","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115303"}}