{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:39:41Z","timestamp":1792528781237,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,13]],"date-time":"2026-07-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783900800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T23:24:38Z","timestamp":1784071478000},"page":"115316","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparison of safety and long-term efficacy of anterior and posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation using EnPlace device for apical pelvic organ prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-2410-1994","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Babin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonatan","family":"Neuman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ehud","family":"Grinstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Menahem","family":"Neuman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shimon","family":"Ginath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith FJ, Holman CDAJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics and gynecology [Internet]. Obstet Gynecol; 2010 [cited 2025 Dec 17];116:1096\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0B013E3181F73729.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f73729"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang W, Cheon WC, Zhang L, Wang X, Wei Y, Lyu C. Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];33:3\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-021-04823-W.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04823-w"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, Klarskov N. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2021 [cited 2025 Dec 17];32:1441\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-020-04515-X.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04515-x"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Y, Peng L, Zhang J, Shen H, Luo D. Sacrospinous ligament fixation vs uterosacral ligaments suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology [Internet]. Urology; 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];166:133\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.UROLOGY.2022.04.012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2022.04.012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tsivian M, Weintraub AY, Neuman M, Tsivian A. Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2016 [cited 2025 Dec 17];27:601\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-015-2875-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2875-6"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lo TS, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Hsieh WC, Yang JC, Huang SY, Chua S. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome? Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2018 [cited 2025 Dec 17];29:811\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-017-3487-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3487-0"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delacroix C, Allegre L, Chatziioannidou K, G\u00e9rard A, Fatton B, de Tayrac R. Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];33:3519\u20132https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-022-05092-X.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05092-x"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bastani P, Tayebi S, Ghabousian A, Salehi-Pourmehr H, Hajebrahimi S. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2022 [cited 2025 Oct 30];33:1857\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-022-05171-Z.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05171-z"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McDonald J, Salehi O, Sathianathen N, Dowling C, Elmer S. Sacrospinous fixation versus uterosacral ligament suspension in managing apical prolapse. World J Urol [Internet]. World J Urol; 2025 [cited 2025 Dec 17];43. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00345-025-05563-Y.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05563-y"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martins SB, Castro RDA, Takano CC, Marquini GV, Oliveira LM De, Martins Junior PCF, et al. Efficacy of sacrospinous fixation or uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [Internet]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 17];45:E584\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/S-0043-1772592.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-1772592"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shah NM, Berger AA, Zhuang Z, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 [cited 2026 Jun 2];227:306.e1-306.e16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.AJOG.2022.05.046.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.05.046"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berger AA, Bretschneider CE, Gregory WT, Sung V. Longitudinal reoperation risk after apical prolapse procedures in women aged 65 years and older. Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. Obstet Gynecol; 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 2];143:411\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005511.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005511"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teilmann-J\u00f8rgensen D, Gommesen D, Wu C, Klarskov N, Rudnicki M. long-term risk of reoperation after vaginal vault suspension by surgical technique: A Nationwide Cohort Study. BJOG [Internet]. BJOG; 2026 [cited 2026 Jun 2];133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.70138.","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.70138"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stairs J, Jain M, Chen I, Clancy A. complications after uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation at vaginal hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study of the national surgical quality improvement program database. Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa) [Internet]. Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];28:834\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001234.","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001234"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mckenzie CM, Crafton CL, Plair A, Matthews CA. Sacrospinous ligament fixation using an anchor versus suture-capturing device: A prospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg [Internet]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];28:131\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001134.","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001134"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evangelopoulos N, Delacroix C, Abdirahman S, de Tayrac R. Safety of an anchor-based device for sacrospinous ligament fixation: A pilot case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 17];299:105\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.EJOGRB.2024.06.012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.06.012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gold RS, Baruch Y, Neuman M, Sumerov N, Groutz A. The EnPlace\u00ae sacrospinous ligament fixation-A novel minimally invasive transvaginal procedure for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair: Safety and short-term outcome results. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 17];163:667\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/IJGO.14927.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14927"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ben Zvi M, Weintraub AY, Friedman T, Neuman M, Tsivian A. Minimally invasive meshless and minimal dissection ligament fixation system for apical organ prolapse procedures: A 4-year prospective follow up study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 17];158:657\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/IJGO.14046.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14046"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Junqueira SCA, de Mattos Louren\u00e7o TR, J\u00fanior JMS, da Fonseca LC, Baracat EC, Haddad JM. Comparison between anterior and posterior vaginal approach in apical prolapse repair in relation to anatomical structures and points of fixation to the sacrospinous ligament in fresh postmenopausal female cadavers. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. Int Urogynecol J; 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 17];34:147\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00192-022-05248-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05248-9"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Gracia S, Fatton B, Cosson M, Campagne-Loiseau S, Ferry P, Lucot JP, et al. Serious complications and recurrence following sacrospinous ligament fixation for the correction of apical prolapse. J Clin Med [Internet]. MDPI; 2023 [cited 2026 Jun 6];12:468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/JCM12020468.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12020468"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003842?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003842?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:03:28Z","timestamp":1792526608000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526003842"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["S0301211526003842"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of safety and long-term efficacy of anterior and posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation using EnPlace device for apical pelvic organ prolapse","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115316","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115316"}}