{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:39:33Z","timestamp":1792528773460,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783987200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejog.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T15:59:05Z","timestamp":1784303945000},"page":"115319","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Less frequent versus more frequent cervical examinations in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"325","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-3689-8042","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alessandro","family":"Petrecca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Benedetta","family":"Bina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Tersigni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tullio","family":"Ghi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vincenzo","family":"Berghella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"First and Second Stage Labor Management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan 1;143(1):144-162. doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005447. PMID: 38096556.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005447"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0010","unstructured":"WHO labour care guide: user\u2019s manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CCBY-NC-SA3.0IGO."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0015","unstructured":"Intrapartum care. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Sep 29. PMID: 37871143."},{"issue":"5S","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S1063","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.11.1299","article-title":"New insights on labor progression: a systematic review","volume":"228","author":"He","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","article-title":"ISUOG Practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound","volume":"52","author":"Ghi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100185","article-title":"Evidence-based labor management: first stage of labor (part 3)","volume":"2","author":"Alhafez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0025","article-title":"Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term","volume":"3","author":"Moncrieff","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100524","article-title":"Incremental risk of clinical chorioamnionitis associated with cervical examination","volume":"4","author":"Gomez Slagle","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619609028375","article-title":"Can the frequency of vaginal examinations influence the duration of labour? A prospective randomised study","volume":"16","author":"Abukhalil","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.004","article-title":"Vaginal assessment and expedited amniotomy inoralmisoprostol labor induction in nulliparas: arandomized trial","volume":"220","author":"Win","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101325","article-title":"Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 hours after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of multiparas: a randomized trial","volume":"6","author":"Aishah","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2475","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14975","article-title":"Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial","volume":"103","author":"Nashreen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2025.101762","article-title":"Routine vaginal examination scheduled at 8 vs 4 hours in multiparous women in early spontaneous labour: a randomised controlled Trial","author":"Radzali","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0055","series-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7647","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation","volume":"349","author":"Shamseer","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0065","series-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 167: 475-478. doi:10.1002\/ijgo.15885.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15885"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0100","unstructured":"(editors). In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011], The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319_b0075","article-title":"Identifying the effective components of a standardized labor induction protocol: secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial","author":"Hamm","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003878?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0301211526003878?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T20:02:49Z","timestamp":1792526569000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0301211526003878"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":19,"alternative-id":["S0301211526003878"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319","relation":{},"ISSN":["0301-2115"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0301-2115","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Less frequent versus more frequent cervical examinations in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2026.115319","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"115319"}}