{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T07:28:04Z","timestamp":1783063684272,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,1]],"date-time":"2017-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1506816000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ejradiology.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]],"date-time":"2017-08-05T11:31:32Z","timestamp":1501932692000},"page":"147-154","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"95","author":[{"given":"Jill","family":"Gluskin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Click","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard","family":"Fleischman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Clarisse","family":"Dromain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth A.","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maxine S.","family":"Jochelson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1944-y","article-title":"Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results","volume":"21","author":"Dromain","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2015.09.019","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI","volume":"84","author":"Chou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-3007-7","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size","volume":"24","author":"Fallenberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2394","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3271-1","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis","volume":"24","author":"Cheung","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121084","article-title":"Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma","volume":"266","author":"Jochelson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.05.015","article-title":"Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM)","volume":"83","author":"Francescone","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-014-3023-6","article-title":"Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?","volume":"146","author":"Fallenberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res. Treat."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2813","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3695-2","article-title":"Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria","volume":"25","author":"Lalji","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0045","series-title":"SenoBright Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography Technology","author":"Carton","year":"2012"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2016.01.012","article-title":"Challenges in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography interpretation: artefacts lexicon","volume":"71","author":"Yagil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin. Radiol."}],"container-title":["European Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0720048X17303224?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0720048X17303224?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,7]],"date-time":"2018-09-07T07:17:25Z","timestamp":1536304645000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0720048X17303224"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"references-count":10,"alternative-id":["S0720048X17303224"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0720-048X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0720-048X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.08.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}