{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T07:13:55Z","timestamp":1761549235986,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]],"date-time":"2025-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764547200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]],"date-time":"2025-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764547200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1758585600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejradiology.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T07:35:51Z","timestamp":1758699351000},"page":"112444","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Comparison of average glandular dose in mammography for patients with breast implants when using automatic or manual exposure technique"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"193","author":[{"given":"Anja","family":"\u0160imunovi\u0107 Simi\u0107","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erna","family":"Aluki\u0107","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Jur\u0161a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maja","family":"Marolt Mu\u0161i\u010d","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9438-7415","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nejc","family":"Meki\u0161","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.32767","article-title":"Breast cancer incidence and mortality before and after implementation of the German mammography screening program","volume":"147","author":"Katalinic","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1515\/raon-2017-0008","article-title":"Cancer burden in Slovenia with the time trends analysis","volume":"51","author":"Zadnik","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiol. Oncol."},{"issue":"7262","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.321.7262.665","article-title":"Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality","volume":"321","author":"Blanks","year":"2000","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2011.599339","article-title":"Mammography activity in Norway 1983 to 2008","volume":"50","author":"Lynge","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Oncol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0025","unstructured":"European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Publications Office; 1996."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0030","first-page":"3846","article-title":"A review of different breast reconstruction methods","volume":"15","author":"Song","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am J Transl Res [internet]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salibian AA, Karp NS. Modern Approaches to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Clinics in Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2023 Apr 1;50(2):223\u201334. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cps.2022.09.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cps.2022.09.003"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/S1526-9523(03)00280-0","article-title":"Breast implants and breast cancer screening","volume":"48","author":"Smalley","year":"2003","journal-title":"Journal of Midwifery and Women\u2019s Health."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-011-0122-3","article-title":"Imaging of breast implants\u2014a pictorial review","volume":"2","author":"Juanpere","year":"2011","journal-title":"Insights into Imaging"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2016.01.478","article-title":"Evaluation of the effect of silicone breast inserts on X-ray mammography and breast tomosynthesis images: a Monte Carlo simulation study","volume":"32","author":"Daskalaki","year":"2016","journal-title":"Phys. Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v12i1.3340","article-title":"Breast phantom with silicone implant for evaluation in conventional mammography","volume":"12","author":"Silva","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0060","article-title":"The relative radiolucencies of breast implant filler materials","volume":"91","author":"Young","year":"1993","journal-title":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [internet]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Foroushani FT, Dzobo K, Khumalo NP, Mora VZ, de Mezerville R, Bayat A. Advances in surface modifications of the silicone breast implant and impact on its biocompatibility and biointegration. Biomaterials Research [Internet]. 2022;26(80). Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40824-022-00314-1.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40824-022-00314-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3390\/bioengineering11090884","article-title":"Two-dimensional mammography imaging techniques for screening women with silicone breast implants: a pilot phantom study","volume":"11","author":"Fitton","year":"2024","journal-title":"Bioengineering"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0075","unstructured":"Public Health England. NHS Breast Screening Programme Screening women with breast implants. National Health Service [Internet]. 2017;(July). Available from: www.gov.uk\/phe."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. American Journal of Roentgenology [Internet]. 1988 Sep 1;151(3):469\u201373. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.151.3.469.","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.151.3.469"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dance DR. Monte-Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Physics in Medicine & Biology [Internet]. 1990;35(9):1211. Available from: https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/35\/9\/002.","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/35\/9\/002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dance DR, Skinner C, Young K, Beckett J, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Physics in Medicine & Biology [Internet]. 2000;45(11):3225. Available from: https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/45\/11\/308.","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/45\/11\/308"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0095","first-page":"15","article-title":"Izra\u010dun povpre\u010dne \u017elezne doze pacientk pri mamografiji (Calculation of mean glandular dose received in mammography)","author":"Kostiov","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bilten (zbornica Radiolo\u0161kih In\u017eenirjev Slovenije)"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1414","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.06.0998","article-title":"Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography","volume":"188","author":"Smathers","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Couto LS, Freitas-Junior R, Correa RS, Peixoto JE, Almeida CD, Rodrigues DCN, et al. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants. Journal of Radiological Protection [Internet]. 2019;39(2):498. Available from: https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/ab0b28.","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6498\/ab0b28"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patidar D, Yap LBC, Begum H, Soh BP. Manual or auto-mode: Does this affect radiation dose in digital mammography without compromising image quality? Radiography [Internet]. 2022 Nov 1;28(4):1064\u201370. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.radi.2022.08.004.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2022.08.004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H\u00e5kansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, B\u00e5th M, M\u00e5nsson LG. ViewDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiation Protection Dosimetry [Internet]. 2010 Apr 1;139(1\u20133):42\u201351. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncq057.","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncq057"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svalkvist A, Svensson S, Hagberg T, B\u00e5th M. VIEWDEX 3.0\u2014RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF A SOFTWARE APPLICATION FACILITATING ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY AND OBSERVER PERFORMANCE. Radiation Protection Dosimetry [Internet]. 2021 Oct 1;195(3\u20134):372\u20137. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncab014.","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncab014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0125","unstructured":"European Union. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Thirty-six European Countries. Part 1\/2. Radiation Protection N\u00b0 180. 2015."},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/nch550","article-title":"A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology","volume":"114","author":"B\u00f6rjesson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Radiat. Prot. Dosim."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Park J, Ko EY, Han B-K, Ko ES, Choi JS, Kim H. Appropriate screening mammography method for patients with breast implants. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2023;13(1):1811. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-28399-1.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-28399-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00e1 dos Reis C, Gremion I, Richli Meystre N. Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria. Insights into Imaging [Internet]. 2020;11(1):3. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-019-0816-5.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0816-5"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0720048X25005303?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0720048X25005303?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T07:08:54Z","timestamp":1761548934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0720048X25005303"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"references-count":28,"alternative-id":["S0720048X25005303"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444","relation":{},"ISSN":["0720-048X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0720-048X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of average glandular dose in mammography for patients with breast implants when using automatic or manual exposure technique","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2025.112444","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"112444"}}