{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T21:20:13Z","timestamp":1789507213060,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003670","name":"National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["NH14-002"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NH14-002"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003670","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ejso.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,5]],"date-time":"2016-08-05T21:28:39Z","timestamp":1470432519000},"page":"994-1002","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":93,"title":["Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"D.A.","family":"Park","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.E.","family":"Yun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.W.","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.H.","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1177\/145749690909800205","article-title":"Robotic surgery in gynecology","volume":"98","author":"Holloway","year":"2009","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.06.024","article-title":"Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature","volume":"16","author":"Cho","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib3","first-page":"77","article-title":"Robotic surgery in gynecology","volume":"28","author":"Magrina","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Gynaecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e3283337c05","article-title":"Role of robotic surgery in urogynecologic surgery","volume":"20","author":"Moy","year":"2010","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.11.010","article-title":"Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"21","author":"Gala","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD008640.pub3","article-title":"Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer","author":"Shi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib7","series-title":"Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses","author":"Ho","year":"2011"},{"issue":"27","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib8","first-page":"1","article-title":"Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis","volume":"10","author":"Ontario","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ont Health Technol Assess Ser"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib9","series-title":"Health technology assessment of robot-assisted surgery in selected surgical procedures","author":"Flattery","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.4103\/0972-9941.97584","article-title":"Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Geetha","year":"2012","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Access Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1772","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7269","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery","volume":"97","author":"Reza","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.03.009","article-title":"A\u00a0case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"113","author":"Estape","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2681-z","article-title":"Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery","volume":"20","author":"Soliman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000160","article-title":"Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management","volume":"24","author":"Chen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"151","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib16","series-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Wiley Online Library","author":"Higgins","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.08.022","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques","volume":"111","author":"Bell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.058","article-title":"A\u00a0case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy","volume":"199","author":"Boggess","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.01.012","article-title":"Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience","volume":"117","author":"Cantrell","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e31829a5db0","article-title":"Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience","volume":"23","author":"Chong","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.09.025","article-title":"Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer","volume":"171","author":"Desille-Gbaguidi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181cf5c2c","article-title":"Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy","volume":"20","author":"Geisler","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib24","first-page":"123","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer","volume":"4","author":"G\u00f6\u00e7men","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Robot Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib25","first-page":"211","article-title":"Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost","volume":"4","author":"Halliday","year":"2010","journal-title":"J\u00a0Robot Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1466","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000232","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study","volume":"24","author":"Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.08.016","article-title":"Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution","volume":"111","author":"Ko","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib28","first-page":"19","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer","volume":"3","author":"Lowe","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Robot Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2009.06.039","article-title":"Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study","volume":"115","author":"Maggioni","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/IGC.0b013e3181ef0a14","article-title":"A\u00a0case\u2013control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer","volume":"20","author":"Nam","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib31","first-page":"227","article-title":"Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer","volume":"12","author":"Nezhat","year":"2008","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-010-0572-5","article-title":"From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve","volume":"7","author":"Schreuder","year":"2010","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.02.002","article-title":"Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital","volume":"121","author":"Sert","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.08.001","article-title":"Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology","volume":"123","author":"Soliman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2622","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-011-1611-9","article-title":"Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study","volume":"18","author":"Tinelli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-011-0683-7","article-title":"Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy\u2014perioperative and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer compared to laparoscopic and open radical surgery","volume":"9","author":"Gortchev","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2125","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12507","article-title":"Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review","volume":"40","author":"Iavazzo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Res"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0748798316306874?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0748798316306874?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,9]],"date-time":"2018-09-09T07:28:59Z","timestamp":1536478139000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0748798316306874"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0748798316306874"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","relation":{},"ISSN":["0748-7983"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0748-7983","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.07.017","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}