{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,27]],"date-time":"2026-10-27T20:48:51Z","timestamp":1793134131435,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761955200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002141","name":"Public Health England","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002141","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006662","name":"National Institute on Handicapped Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006662","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","ejso.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["European Journal of Surgical Oncology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]],"date-time":"2025-09-04T00:34:28Z","timestamp":1756946068000},"page":"110431","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Discrepancy between mammographic and pathological sizing of screen-detected DCIS: Risk factors and impact on ipsilateral recurrence rates"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"51","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1725-4790","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C.C.","family":"Kirwan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Hilton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0113-4409","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"K.","family":"Clements","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8787-4904","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"D.","family":"Dodwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.E.","family":"Pinder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Shaaban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Stobart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Wallis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Provenzano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.J.","family":"Maxwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3991-0768","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"N.","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Sawyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1959-266X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Lowes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Kearins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1719-7255","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"R.I.","family":"Cutress","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0059-2275","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Mylvaganam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Thompson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.170.2.2536185","article-title":"Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications","volume":"170","author":"Dershaw","year":"1989","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2020","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-011-2143-1","article-title":"Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain","volume":"21","author":"Domingo","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2022.01.001","article-title":"Unresected screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: outcomes of 311 women in the Forget-Me-Not 2 study","volume":"61","author":"Maxwell","year":"2022","journal-title":"Breast"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.11102368","article-title":"Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer","volume":"260","author":"Meagan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djs142","article-title":"Network metaanalysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ","volume":"104","author":"Wang","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib7","first-page":"345:e4505","article-title":"Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics","volume":"12","author":"Jeevan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4751","article-title":"Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery","volume":"152","author":"Langhans","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2018181426","article-title":"Impact of digital mammography on cancer detection and recall rates: 11.3 million screening episodes in the English national health service breast cancer screening program","volume":"290","author":"Blanks","year":"2019","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2014.02.023","article-title":"On behalf of the Sloane project steering group. Adverse surgical outcomes in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast","volume":"50","author":"Thomas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6605513","article-title":"Radiological and pathological size estimations of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, specimen handling and the influence on the success of breast conservation surgery: a review of 2564 cases from the sloane project","volume":"102","author":"Thomas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"32","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4054","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2013.49.5077","article-title":"Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial","volume":"31","author":"Donker","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"369","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib15","article-title":"Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study","volume":"27","author":"Mannu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1038\/s41416-020-01152-5","article-title":"Pathological features of 11,337 patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and subsequent events: results from the UK Sloane Project","volume":"124","author":"Shaaban","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-061585","article-title":"Cohort profile of the Sloane Project: methodology for a prospective UK cohort study of >15 000 women with screen-detected non-invasive breast neoplasia","volume":"12","author":"Clements","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2018.06.027","article-title":"Management and 5-year outcomes in 9938 women with screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: the UK Sloane Project","volume":"101","author":"Thompson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib19","unstructured":"An audit of screen Detected breast Cancers for the year of screening April 2008 to march 2009. NHS Breast Screening programme and Association of Breast Surgery at BASO.https:\/\/associationofbreastsurgery.org.uk\/media\/lhhavljm\/nhs-bsp-abs-at-baso-audit-2008-09.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2025."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib20","unstructured":"An audit of screen Detected breast cancers for the year of screening April 2004 to March 2005. NHS Breast Screening programme and Association of Breast Surgery at BASO. https:\/\/associationofbreastsurgery.org.uk\/media\/wbpbalxr\/nhs-bsp-abs-at-baso-audit-2004-05.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2025."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1487","DOI":"10.1038\/s41379-021-00807-9","article-title":"Multi-magnification-based machine learning as an ancillary tool for the pathologic assessment of shaved margins for breast carcinoma lumpectomy specimens","volume":"34","author":"D'Alfonso","year":"2021","journal-title":"Mod Pathol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2014.02.023","article-title":"Adverse surgical outcomes in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast","volume":"50","author":"Thomas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6605513","article-title":"Radiological and pathological size estimations of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, specimen handling and the influence on the success of breast conservation surgery: a review of 2564 cases from the Sloane Project","volume":"102","author":"Thomas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.06.020","article-title":"Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens","volume":"49","author":"van Luijt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.09.018","article-title":"Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment \u2013 a population based study from the Netherlands","volume":"50","author":"Nederend","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461070200","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST","volume":"246","author":"Pisano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2014.926","article-title":"Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma. A report from the national cancer data base, 2004-2010","volume":"149","author":"Wilke","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2008.04.008","article-title":"Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy","volume":"35","author":"Bani","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib29","first-page":"3471","article-title":"Non-menopausal status, high nuclear grade, tumor size >30 mm and positive resection margins are predictors of residual tumor after lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast","volume":"35","author":"Joste","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3740","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-021-11293-3","article-title":"Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A nomogram for close\/positive margins after lumpectomy for DCIS","volume":"29","author":"Martins","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1831","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-5067-1","article-title":"Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence as those after one-step breast-conserving surgery?","volume":"23","author":"Hennigs","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2022.101779","article-title":"Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies","volume":"42","author":"Mohamedahmed","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s40477-020-00551-x","volume":"25","author":"Moschetta","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Ultrasound"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-013-2598-7","volume":"139","author":"Rauch","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib35","series-title":"Version 2.2017 invasive Breast cancer: margin status in infiltrating carcinoma","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4040","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2016.68.3573","article-title":"Society of surgical oncology-American society for radiation oncology-American society of clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for BreastConserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ","volume":"34","author":"Morrow","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdz173","article-title":"Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical Practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up","volume":"30","author":"Cardoso","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Surgical Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0748798325008595?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0748798325008595?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T01:42:39Z","timestamp":1772847759000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0748798325008595"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0748798325008595"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431","relation":{},"ISSN":["0748-7983"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0748-7983","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Discrepancy between mammographic and pathological sizing of screen-detected DCIS: Risk factors and impact on ipsilateral recurrence rates","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"European Journal of Surgical Oncology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2025.110431","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"110431"}}