{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]],"date-time":"2026-02-24T08:39:42Z","timestamp":1771922382952,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.es","elsevier.es","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Enfermer\u00eda Cl\u00ednica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,11]],"date-time":"2016-10-11T03:31:27Z","timestamp":1476156687000},"page":"28-39","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Riesgo de rotura uterina en el parto vaginal tras ces\u00e1rea: revisi\u00f3n sistem\u00e1tica"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Pedro","family":"Hidalgo-Lopezosa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mar\u00eda","family":"Hidalgo-Maestre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0200","unstructured":"Sociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Ginecolog\u00eda y Obstetricia (SEGO). Ces\u00e1rea. Gu\u00eda pr\u00e1ctica de asistencia. Prosego [internet]. 2015 [consultado 15 Feb 2015]. Disponible en: http:\/\/www.prosego.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Ces\u2013rea-2015-2.pdf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0205","series-title":"Fundamentos de Obstetricia","first-page":"793","article-title":"La ces\u00e1rea","author":"Nieto","year":"2007"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.05.015","article-title":"Mode of delivery after one caesarean section","volume":"87","author":"Van Bogaert","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1187","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.108890","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labor. A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999","volume":"183","author":"Mozurkewich","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2012-0103","article-title":"Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: Lessons from a population-based study","volume":"41","author":"Shatz","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Perinat Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0225","unstructured":"Gu\u00eda de Pr\u00e1ctica Cl\u00ednica. Ces\u00e1rea anterior. C\u00f3rdoba: Unidad de Gesti\u00f3n Cl\u00ednica de Obstetricia y Ginecolog\u00eda. Hospital Universitario Reina Sof\u00eda; 2015."},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0230","first-page":"450","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"116","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30188-8","article-title":"Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth","volume":"27","author":"Martel","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1159\/000357757","article-title":"Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study","volume":"77","author":"Tessmer-Tuck","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2014.196","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk women: A population-based study","volume":"35","author":"Regan","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0250","first-page":"735","article-title":"Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"4","author":"Haumonte","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.012","article-title":"Delivery after prior cesarean: Maternal morbidity and mortality","volume":"38","author":"Cheng","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.006","article-title":"The influence of intrapartum factors on risk of uterine rupture and successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"38","author":"Grivell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903067394","article-title":"Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour","volume":"23","author":"Ogbonmwan","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5","article-title":"National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights March 8-10, 2010","volume":"115","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600746654","article-title":"Induction of labor: Comparison of a cohort with uterine scar from previous cesarean section","volume":"19","author":"Locatelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.04.002","article-title":"Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study","volume":"193","author":"Macones","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.022","article-title":"Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: A survival analysis","volume":"206","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1275386","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Risk of uterine rupture with labor induction","volume":"28","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labour after one prior caesarean","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1646","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2011.05635.x","article-title":"Clinical interventions that increase the uptake and success of vaginal birth after caesarean section: A systematic review","volume":"67","author":"Catling-Paull","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0305","first-page":"122","article-title":"Factores relacionados con la v\u00eda de parto tras ces\u00e1rea anterior","volume":"36","author":"Castillo N\u00fa\u00f1ez","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1229","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.499448","article-title":"Morbidity associated with failed vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"89","author":"Oboro","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.12.013","article-title":"Predicting why women have elective repeat cesarean deliveries and predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"126","author":"Mone","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section","volume":"117","author":"Al-Zirqi","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-5013(04)75966-X","article-title":"Rotura uterina y ces\u00e1rea anterior. Revisi\u00f3n y casu\u00edstica durante el per\u00edodo de 1999 a 2002 en el Hospital Universitario La Paz","volume":"47","author":"Gunti\u00f1as","year":"2004","journal-title":"Prog Obstet Ginecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2010.03.023","article-title":"Risk factors for uterine rupture during a vaginal birth after one previous cesarean section: A case-control study","volume":"151","author":"Weimar","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1001184","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001184","article-title":"Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: A national case-control study","volume":"9","author":"Fitzpatrick","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000143257.29471.82","article-title":"Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers","volume":"104","author":"Lieberman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: A retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12240","article-title":"Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"92","author":"Studsgaard","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318273feeb","article-title":"Uterine rupture during trial of labor: Controversy of induction's methods","volume":"67","author":"Ophir","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017","article-title":"Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands","volume":"132","author":"Kwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.001","article-title":"Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"Cahill","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1266159","article-title":"Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section","volume":"28","author":"Scifres","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.026","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"212","author":"Palatnik","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12188","article-title":"Planned home VBAC in the United States, 2004-2009: Outcomes, maternity care practices, and implications for shared decision making","volume":"42","author":"Cox","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.777700","article-title":"Association of labor induction or stimulation with infant mortality in women with failed versus successful trial of labor after prior cesarean","volume":"26","author":"Chen","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."}],"container-title":["Enfermer\u00eda Cl\u00ednica"],"original-title":[],"language":"es","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S113086211630122X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S113086211630122X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,7]],"date-time":"2018-09-07T15:25:28Z","timestamp":1536333928000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S113086211630122X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S113086211630122X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1130-8621"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1130-8621","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Riesgo de rotura uterina en el parto vaginal tras ces\u00e1rea: revisi\u00f3n sistem\u00e1tica","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Enfermer\u00eda Cl\u00ednica","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.enfcli.2016.08.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Espa\u00f1a, S.L.U. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}