{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,31]],"date-time":"2026-10-31T03:45:27Z","timestamp":1793418327681,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":109,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,12]],"date-time":"2026-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768176000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100014803","name":"European Food Safety Authority","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100014803","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000066","name":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000066","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000038","name":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000038","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Environment International"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]],"date-time":"2026-01-16T16:58:44Z","timestamp":1768582724000},"page":"110070","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"208","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7486-4045","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Sachse","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1910-7281","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sebastian","family":"Schmeisser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"van Benthem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raffaella","family":"Corvi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eugenia","family":"Dogliotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norman","family":"Ertych","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roland","family":"Fr\u00f6tschl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ulrike","family":"G\u00fcndel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kristin","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carsten","family":"Kneuer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeannette","family":"K\u00f6nig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hans-J\u00f6rg","family":"Martus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Pfuhler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephanie","family":"Smith-Roe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helga","family":"Stopper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"White","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tanja","family":"Schwerdtle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Hensel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tewes","family":"Tralau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1002\/etc.34","article-title":"Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment","volume":"29","author":"Ankley","year":"2010","journal-title":"Environ. Toxicol. Chem."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartoszek A. and Holota S. (2023). Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Compounds in Food In Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components, Staroszczyk H., Sikorski Z. E. (eds), 4th Edition edn. CRC Press.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003265955-18"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22521","article-title":"Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of genotoxicity data provides protective estimates of in vivo dose","volume":"64","author":"Beal","year":"2023","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gev064","article-title":"The use of dose-response data in a margin of exposure approach to carcinogenic risk assessment for genotoxic chemicals in food","volume":"31","author":"Benford","year":"2015","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cbi.2018.11.020","article-title":"The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: a comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations","volume":"301","author":"Calabrese","year":"2019","journal-title":"Chem. Biol. Interact."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1002\/em.21854","article-title":"Quantitative dose\u2013response analysis of ethyl methanesulfonate genotoxicity in adult gpt-delta transgenic mice","volume":"55","author":"Cao","year":"2014","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2016.09.012","article-title":"Current methods in risk assessment of genotoxic chemicals","volume":"106","author":"Cartus","year":"2017","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22087","article-title":"Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis","volume":"58","author":"Chatterjee","year":"2017","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22517","article-title":"Establishing a quantitative framework for regulatory interpretation of genetic toxicity dose-response data: margin of exposure case study of 48 compounds with both in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity dose\u2013response data","volume":"64","author":"Chepelev","year":"2023","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22479","article-title":"AOP report: development of an adverse outcome pathway for oxidative DNA damage leading to mutations and chromosomal aberrations","volume":"63","author":"Cho","year":"2022","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0055","article-title":"ESAC Opinion on the Scientific Validity of the RS Comet and RSMN Test Methods","author":"Clewell","year":"2025","journal-title":"Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cbi.2019.01.025","article-title":"Dose-dependence of chemical carcinogenicity: biological mechanisms for thresholds and implications for risk assessment","volume":"301","author":"Clewell","year":"2019","journal-title":"Chem. Biol. Interact."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cotox.2017.04.002","article-title":"The relevance of experimental carcinogenicity studies to human safety","volume":"3","author":"Cohen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Curr. Opin Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0070","unstructured":"COM (Committee on Mutagenicity) (2010). Guidance - Assessment of thresholds for in vivo mutagens https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/media\/5a7ed0c0e5274a2e87db215a\/assessment_of_threshold_for_in_vivo_mutagens.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0075","unstructured":"COM (Committee on Mutagenicity) (2018). Statement on the quantitative approaches to the assessment of genotoxicity data. https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/media\/5ae9ca92e5274a7024fd7083\/COM_statement_on_quantitative_approaches.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0080","unstructured":"COM (Committee on Mutagenicity) (2021). Guidance on a strategy for genotoxicity testing of chemicals. https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/1043249\/strategy-for-genotoxicity-testing-of-chemicals-guidance.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tiv.2017.09.010","article-title":"Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: report of an EURL ECVAM\/ESTIV workshop","volume":"45","author":"Corvi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Toxicol. In Vitro"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22045","article-title":"Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: a conceptual framework and considerations","volume":"58","author":"Dearfield","year":"2017","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1002\/em.70022","article-title":"Advancing Genotoxicity Assessment by building a Global AOP Network","volume":"66","author":"Demuynck","year":"2025","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2011.06.005","article-title":"Defining EMS and ENU dose-response relationships using the Pig-a mutation assay in rats","volume":"725","author":"Dobo","year":"2011","journal-title":"Mutation Research\/genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis"},{"key":"#cr-split#-10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0105.1","unstructured":"EC (European Commission) (2008). Regulation"},{"key":"#cr-split#-10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0105.2","unstructured":"(EC) No 1272\/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67\/548\/EEC and 1999\/45\/EC, and amending Regulation"},{"key":"#cr-split#-10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0105.3","unstructured":"(EC) No 1907\/2006. Current consolidated version: 01\/12\/2023. In EC (ed.). European Parliament and Council, Brussels, Belgium."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0110","unstructured":"ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) (2012). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment - Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health. https:\/\/echa.europa.eu\/documents\/10162\/13632\/information_requirements_r8_en.pdf\/e153243a-03f0-44c5-8808-88af66223258."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0115","unstructured":"ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) (2017). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment - Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance. https:\/\/echa.europa.eu\/documents\/10162\/17224\/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf\/e4a2a18f-a2bd-4a04-ac6d-0ea425b2567f."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0120","unstructured":"ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) (2018). Opinion on scientific evaluation of occupational exposure limits for Benzene. https:\/\/echa.europa.eu\/documents\/10162\/13641\/benzene_opinion_en.pdf\/4fec9aac-9ed5-2aae-7b70-5226705358c7."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e282","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2005.282","article-title":"Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a Harmonised Approach for Risk Assessment of Substances which are both Genotoxic and Carcinogenic","volume":"3","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2005","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0130","first-page":"e2379","article-title":"Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and feed safety assessment","volume":"9","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2011","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0135","first-page":"e5708","article-title":"Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological concern approach in food safety assessment","volume":"17","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2019","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0140","first-page":"e5809","article-title":"Statement on the available outcomes of the human health assessment in the context of the pesticides peer review of the active substance chlorpyrifos","volume":"17","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2019","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0145","unstructured":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2021a). Scientific panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed - Minute of the 153rd FEEDAP plenary meeting."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0150","first-page":"e6770","article-title":"Guidance on aneugenicity assessment","volume":"19","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2021","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0155","first-page":"e7584","article-title":"Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment","volume":"20","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2022","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0160","first-page":"e8270","article-title":"Harmonised approach for reporting reliability and relevance of genotoxicity studies","volume":"20","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2023","journal-title":"EFSA Supporting Publ."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0165","first-page":"e8488","article-title":"Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food","volume":"22","author":"EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)","year":"2024","journal-title":"EFSA J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0170","unstructured":"EMA (European Medicines Agency) (2012). ICH guideline S2 (R1) on genotoxicity testing and data interpretation for pharmaceuticals intended for human use - Step 5."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0175","unstructured":"EMA (European Medicines Agency) (2023). ICH M7 Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk - Scientific guideline. https:\/\/www.ema.europa.eu\/en\/ich-m7-assessment-control-dna-reactive-mutagenic-impurities-pharmaceuticals-limit-potential-carcinogenic-risk-scientific-guideline."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0180","unstructured":"EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1996). Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. EPA\/600\/P-92\/003C."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0185","unstructured":"FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) (2000). Guidance for industry and other stakeholders: Toxicological principles for the safety assessment of food ingredients: Redbook 2000 [updated July 2007]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0190","unstructured":"FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) (2025). Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/186092\/download?attachment."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1080\/10408444.2020.1727843","article-title":"Hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment of carcinogens: too much or too little? \u2013 Report of an ECETOC workshop","volume":"50","author":"Felter","year":"2020","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1080\/10408444.2021.2003295","article-title":"Assessing chemical carcinogenicity: hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment. Insight from a Toxicology Forum state-of-the-science workshop","volume":"51","author":"Felter","year":"2021","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0205","unstructured":"FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand) (2013). Approach to Establishing Health-Based Guidance Values (HBGVs). https:\/\/www.foodstandards.gov.au."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.5487\/TR.2018.34.4.291","article-title":"Quantitative Approaches to Assess Key Carcinogenic events of Genotoxic Carcinogens","volume":"34","author":"Fukushima","year":"2018","journal-title":"Toxicological Research"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.toxlet.2009.03.021","article-title":"MNT and Muta\u2122Mouse studies to define the in vivo dose response relations of the genotoxicity of EMS and ENU","volume":"190","author":"Gocke","year":"2009","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cbi.2019.01.038","article-title":"An examination of the linear no-threshold hypothesis of cancer risk assessment: Introduction to a series of reviews documenting the lack of biological plausibility of LNT","volume":"301","author":"Golden","year":"2019","journal-title":"Chem. Biol. Interact."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1002\/em.21727","article-title":"Quantitative approaches for assessing dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology studies","volume":"54","author":"Gollapudi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1039\/c8tx00004b","article-title":"Goodbye to the bioassay","volume":"7","author":"Goodman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Toxicol. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2443","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-016-1923-4","article-title":"Dose-response relationship of temozolomide, determined by the Pig-a, comet, and micronucleus assay","volume":"91","author":"Gu\u00e9rard","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.3390\/nu9070717","article-title":"A Balanced Risk-Benefit Analysis to Determine Human risks Associated with Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PA)\u2013The Case of Tea and Herbal Infusions","volume":"9","author":"Habs","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nutrients"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1787","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-020-02733-2","article-title":"Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens","volume":"94","author":"Hartwig","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0250","unstructured":"Health Canada (1993). The assessment of mutagenicity: Health Protection Branch mutagenicity guidelines https:\/\/publications.gc.ca\/collections\/Collection\/H49-85-1993E-2.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0255","unstructured":"Health Canada (2021). Cancer Risk Assessment Methodology - A Survey of Current Practices at Health Canada. https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/hc-sc\/documents\/services\/publications\/science-research-data\/cancer-risk-assessment-methodology-survey-current-practices\/cancer-risk-assessment-methodology-a-survey-of-current-practices-at-health-canada-eng.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0260","unstructured":"Health Canada (2022). Guidance document for the New Substances Notification Regulations (Chemicals and Polymers). https:\/\/publications.gc.ca\/collections\/collection_2022\/eccc\/En14-506-2022-eng.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0265","unstructured":"Health Canada (2024). FEDERAL CONTAMINATED SITE RISK ASSESSMENT IN CANADA: Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA). https:\/\/publications.gc.ca\/collections\/collection_2024\/sc-hc\/H129-114-2023-eng.pdf."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0270","unstructured":"Health Canada (2025). Strategy to replace, reduce or refine vertebrate animal testing under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA). https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/en\/environment-climate-change\/services\/canadian-environmental-protection-act-registry\/implementing-modernized-cepa\/strategy-replace-reduce-refine-vertebrate-animal-testing.html."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22338","article-title":"Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision-making","volume":"61","author":"Heflich","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCRESAHA.121.319809","article-title":"Somatic Mutations in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"130","author":"Heimlich","year":"2022","journal-title":"Circ. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1351\/pac200173060993","article-title":"Risk assessment for occupational exposure to chemicals. a review of current methodology (IUPAC Technical Report)","volume":"73","author":"Herber","year":"2001","journal-title":"Pure Appl. Chem."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1002\/em.20651","article-title":"Can carcinogenic potency be predicted from in vivo genotoxicity data? a meta-analysis of historical data","volume":"52","author":"Hern\u00e1ndez","year":"2011","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/ftox.2022.827328","article-title":"A Case Study on Integrating a New Key Event into an existing adverse Outcome Pathway on Oxidative DNA damage: challenges and Approaches in a Data-Rich Area","author":"Huliganga","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1038\/nature08467","article-title":"The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease","volume":"461","author":"Jackson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.030","article-title":"Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods","volume":"574","author":"J\u00e4gerstad","year":"2005","journal-title":"Mutation Research\/fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1002\/em.21870","article-title":"Derivation of point of departure (PoD) estimates in genetic toxicology studies and their potential applications in risk assessment","volume":"55","author":"Johnson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22446","article-title":"Permitted daily exposure limits for noteworthy N-nitrosamines","volume":"62","author":"Johnson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2006.11.008","article-title":"How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop","volume":"628","author":"Kirkland","year":"2007","journal-title":"Mutat. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2024.503762","article-title":"Liver-on-chip model and application in predictive genotoxicity and mutagenicity of drugs","volume":"896","author":"Kopp","year":"2024","journal-title":"Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2007.06.021","article-title":"Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients","volume":"45","author":"Kroes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-genet-112414-054722","article-title":"Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair in Relation to DNA Replication","volume":"49","author":"Kunkel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Genet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2067","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-022-03286-2","article-title":"Comprehensive interpretation of in vitro micronucleus test results for 292 chemicals: from hazard identification to risk assessment application","volume":"96","author":"Kuo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.taap.2015.11.010","article-title":"Tissue-specific in vivo genetic toxicity of nine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons assessed using the Muta\u2122Mouse transgenic rodent assay","volume":"290","author":"Long","year":"2016","journal-title":"Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22346","article-title":"Utility of a next generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: a case study using the industrial chemical benzene","volume":"61","author":"Luijten","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.toxlet.2009.07.032","article-title":"The Viracept (nelfinavir)\u2013Ethyl methanesulfonate case: a threshold risk assessment for human exposure to a genotoxic drug contamination?","volume":"190","author":"Lutz","year":"2009","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2014.10.008","article-title":"IWGT report on quantitative approaches to genotoxicity risk assessment II. use of point-of-departure (PoD) metrics in defining acceptable exposure limits and assessing human risk","volume":"783","author":"MacGregor","year":"2015","journal-title":"Mutation Research\/genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2014.09.011","article-title":"IWGT report on quantitative approaches to genotoxicity risk assessment I. Methods and metrics for defining exposure\u2013response relationships and points of departure (PoDs)","volume":"783","author":"MacGregor","year":"2015","journal-title":"Mutation Research\/genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0370","unstructured":"MAK (Permanent Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area) (2025). List of MAK and BAT Values 2025. Doi:10.34865\/mbwl_2025_eng."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1103","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-021-02977-6","article-title":"The 28\u2009+\u200928 day design is an effective sampling time for analyzing mutant frequencies in rapidly proliferating tissues of MutaMouse animals","volume":"95","author":"Marchetti","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-023-03553-w","article-title":"Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose\u2013response data","volume":"97","author":"Menz","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cotox.2018.11.007","article-title":"Genotoxicity in risk assessment: is it time to use a threshold approach?","volume":"11\u201312","author":"Metruccio","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr. Opin Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22465","article-title":"Effect of life stage and target tissue on dose-response assessment of ethyl methane sulfonate-induced genotoxicity","volume":"62","author":"Mittelstaedt","year":"2021","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1080\/10408444.2017.1423462","article-title":"Development of an adverse outcome pathway for chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma: case study of AFB1, a human carcinogen with a mutagenic mode of action","volume":"48","author":"Moore","year":"2018","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.toxlet.2009.02.005","article-title":"EMS in Viracept\u2013The course of events in 2007 and 2008 from the non-clinical safety point of view","volume":"190","author":"M\u00fcller","year":"2009","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.toxlet.2009.03.015","article-title":"Considerations regarding a permitted daily exposure calculation for ethyl methanesulfonate","volume":"190","author":"M\u00fcller Lutz and Gocke Elmar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fct.2006.07.004","article-title":"Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal","volume":"44","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2006","journal-title":"Food Chem. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"OECD (2017). Overview on genetic toxicology TGs, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 238. OECD Publishing, Paris. Doi:10.1787\/9789264274761-en.","DOI":"10.1787\/9789264274761-en"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0425","article-title":"Severity of effect considerations regarding the use of mutation as a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment: a report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)","author":"Parsons","year":"2024","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pfuhler S., van Benthem J., Curren R., Doak S. H., Dusinska M., Hayashi M., Heflich R. H., Kidd D., Kirkland D., Luan Y., Ouedraogo G., Reisinger K., Sofuni T., van Acker F., Yang Y., Corvi R. (2020). Use of in vitro 3D tissue models in genotoxicity testing: Strategic fit, validation status and way forward. Report of the working group from the 7th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT). Mutation Research\/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 850-851: 503135. Doi:10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2020.503135.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mrgentox.2020.503135"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4274(02)00496-4","article-title":"Regulatory recognition of indirect genotoxicity mechanisms in the European Union","volume":"140\u2013141","author":"Pratt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0440","unstructured":"RAC\/SCOEL (ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment \/ Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits) (2017). Joint Task Force ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) on Scientific aspects and methodologies related to the exposure of chemicals at the workplace - TASK 2. https:\/\/echa.europa.eu\/documents\/10162\/17090\/jtf_opinion_task_2_en.pdf\/db8a9a3a-4aa7-601b-bb53-81a5eef93145."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22339","article-title":"Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to genotoxic modes of action","volume":"61","author":"Sasaki","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0450","unstructured":"SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) (2023). SCCS Notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation - 12th revision, 15 May 2023, corrigendum 1 on 26 October 2023, corrigendum 2 on 21 December 2023. https:\/\/health.ec.europa.eu\/publications\/sccs-notes-guidance-testing-cosmetic-ingredients-and-their-safety-evaluation-12th-revision_en."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1002\/em.20687","article-title":"Need and potential value of the Pig-ain vivo mutation assay\u2013a hesi perspective","volume":"52","author":"Schuler","year":"2011","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s00204-025-04103-2","article-title":"Deriving safe limits for N-nitroso-bisoprolol by error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) and benchmark dose (BMD) analysis, integrated with QM modeling and CYP-docking analysis","author":"Simon","year":"2025","journal-title":"Arch. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.3109\/10408444.2014.925424","article-title":"Benchmark dose and the three Rs. Part II. Consequences for study design and animal use","volume":"44","author":"Slob","year":"2014","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.3109\/10408444.2014.925423","article-title":"Benchmark dose and the three Rs. Part I. getting more information from the same number of animals","volume":"44","author":"Slob","year":"2014","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gev043","article-title":"Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test","volume":"31","author":"Soeteman-Hern\u00e1ndez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1626","DOI":"10.1158\/0008-5472.CAN-19-2822","article-title":"Biomedical Research Meets Toxicology: how In Vitro Chromosome Instability Methods can Contribute to Carcinogenicity Prediction","volume":"80","author":"Stolz","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cancer Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.chemrestox.3c00318","article-title":"Unlocking the Power of Transcriptomic Biomarkers in Qualitative and Quantitative Genotoxicity Assessment of Chemicals","volume":"37","author":"Thienpont","year":"2024","journal-title":"Chem. Res. Toxicol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van den Berg S., Restani P., Boersma M.e, Delmulle L., Rietjens I. M. C. M. (2011). Levels of Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Compounds in Plant Food Supplements and Associated Risk Assessment. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2: 989-1010. Doi:10.4236\/fns.2011.29134.","DOI":"10.4236\/fns.2011.29134"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.toxlet.2009.03.027","article-title":"The Viracept-EMS case: Impact and outlook","volume":"190","author":"Walker","year":"2009","journal-title":"Toxicol. Lett."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gew011","article-title":"Genetic toxicology at the crossroads\u2013from qualitative hazard evaluation to quantitative risk assessment","volume":"31","author":"White","year":"2016","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22351","article-title":"Quantitative Interpretation of Genetic Toxicity Dose-Response Data for Risk Assessment and Regulatory Decision-making: Current Status and Emerging Priorities","volume":"61","author":"White","year":"2020","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1002\/em.70006","article-title":"Benchmark Response (BMR) Values for In Vivo Mutagenicity Endpoints","volume":"66","author":"White","year":"2025","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0515","unstructured":"WHO (World Health Organization) (2020a). Chapter 5 Dose-response assessment and derivation of health-based guidance values In Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food, World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (ed), Second edition edn. IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, Switzerland."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0520","unstructured":"WHO (World Health Organization) (2020b). Chapter 4 Hazard Identification and Characterization: Toxicological and Human Studies - Section 4.5 Genotoxicity In Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food, World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (ed), Second edition edn. IPCS International Programme on Chemical Safety,, Geneva, Switzerland."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cbi.2019.01.028","article-title":"Economic benefit-cost implications of the LNT model","volume":"301","author":"Williams","year":"2019","journal-title":"Chem. Biol. Interact."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1093\/mutage\/gev085","article-title":"Empirical analysis of BMD metrics in genetic toxicology part I: in vitro analyses to provide robust potency rankings and support MOA determinations","volume":"31","author":"Wills","year":"2016","journal-title":"Mutagenesis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1002\/em.22137","article-title":"Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay","volume":"58","author":"Wills","year":"2017","journal-title":"Environ. Mol. Mutagen."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070_b0540","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zang Y. J. and Kabadi S. V. (2023). Food Additives. In Patty's Toxicology, pp 1-22. Doi:10.1002\/0471125474.tox145.","DOI":"10.1002\/0471125474.tox145"}],"container-title":["Environment International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0160412026000280?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0160412026000280?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T14:11:19Z","timestamp":1782915079000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0160412026000280"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"references-count":109,"alternative-id":["S0160412026000280"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070","relation":{},"ISSN":["0160-4120"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0160-4120","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Environment International","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.envint.2026.110070","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment. Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"110070"}}