{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T20:58:36Z","timestamp":1776891516565,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Oxford University Press (OUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672790400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2349,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,30]],"date-time":"2016-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1469836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,8]],"date-time":"2016-07-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1467936000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["smoa.jsexmed.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Penile prosthesis (PP) is the established treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who do not respond to phosphodiesterase inhibitors and intracavernosal injections. In general, these devices have been largely successful but there are not free of serious complication such as PP infection (PPI). PPI requires immediate surgical removal or salvage rescue of the PP.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In this report, we present two clinical cases with inflatable PP (IPP) treated locally with antibiotic and high pressure irrigation and then avoid the PP removal or salvage rescue.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We present two patients with PPI in our institution and literature review.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Main Outcome Measures<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Resolution of the two cases.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Patient A (A) was 44 years old and patient B (B) 51 years old presented PPI after three weeks (A) and eight weeks (B). Both patients were diabetic. Physical exploration revealed an open scrotal incision at its margin with a clear discharge. The rest of the incision and scrotum were clean and dry. They had not scrotum pain\/tenderness or systemic\/septic symptoms. The bacterial culture of the incisional drainage revealed a Staphylococcus aureus (A) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (B). In both cases, we performed an excision of the tissue around the pump with a high pressure pulsed irrigation (Interpulse; Stryker Corp, Kalamazoo, MI, USA). For the irrigation we used three different solutions that included povidone-iodine, antibiotics (gentamicin plus vancomicin), and hydrogen peroxyde. Finally, we performed a multilayered surgical closure with the use of aspirate drainage over 24 hours and intravenous antibiotics. The patients had a total resolution of its symptoms after 20 months (A) and 36 months (B), and the IPP worked properly.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This treatment could be an option for to perform specific patients with local IPP infection without systemic symptoms instead of surgical removal.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esxm.2016.06.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,31]],"date-time":"2016-07-31T16:06:58Z","timestamp":1469981218000},"page":"e255-e258","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Local Treatment of Penile Prosthesis Infection as Alternative to Immediate Salvage Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1093","volume":"4","author":[{"given":"Saturnino","family":"Luj\u00e1n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"},{"name":"Hospital Universitari i Polit\u00e8cnic La Fe , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ram\u00f3n","family":"Rogel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"},{"name":"Hospital Universitari i Polit\u00e8cnic La Fe , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Enrique","family":"Broseta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"},{"name":"Hospital Universitari i Polit\u00e8cnic La Fe , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Francisco","family":"Boronat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"},{"name":"Hospital Universitari i Polit\u00e8cnic La Fe , Val\u00e8ncia , Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"286","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.05.048","article-title":"North American consensus document on infection of penile prostheses","volume":"82","author":"Darouiche","year":"2013","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib2","first-page":"1631","article-title":"Infections versus penile implants: The war on bugs","volume":"189","author":"Muench","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib3","first-page":"481","article-title":"Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants","volume":"163","author":"Mulcahy","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib4","first-page":"89","article-title":"Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: A multicenter study","volume":"173","author":"Henry","year":"2005","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib5","first-page":"153","article-title":"Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: A multicenter study","volume":"172","author":"Henry","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/S0302-2838(01)00011-2","article-title":"Successful conservative treatment of infected penile prostheses [correction of protheses]","volume":"41","author":"Deroue","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib7","first-page":"612","article-title":"Observation of local clinical penile prostheses infections instead of immediate salvage rescue\/removal: multicenter study with surprising results","volume":"191","author":"Henry","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-011-1291-8","article-title":"Comparison of a low-pressure and a high-pressure pulsatile lavage during debridement for orthopaedic implant infection","volume":"131","author":"Munoz-Mahamud","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhin.2005.07.012","article-title":"Does pulse lavage reduce hip hemiarthroplasty infection rates?","volume":"62","author":"Hargrove","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Hosp Infect"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib10","first-page":"1537","article-title":"Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin","volume":"159","author":"Wilson","year":"1998","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib11","first-page":"1474","article-title":"Malleable implant substitution for the management of penile prosthesis pump erosion: A pilot study","volume":"6","author":"Kohler","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Sex Med"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib12","first-page":"1078","article-title":"National trends in the treatment of penile prosthesis infections by explantation alone vs. immediate salvage and reimplantation","volume":"11","author":"Zargaroff","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Sex Med"},{"key":"2023011908390153500_bib13","first-page":"e685","article-title":"Infection retardant coated versus non-coated penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: A multicenter study","volume":"189","author":"Henry","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"}],"container-title":["Sexual Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2050116116300447?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2050116116300447?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smoa\/article-pdf\/4\/4\/e255\/48767055\/smoa_4_4_e255.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smoa\/article-pdf\/4\/4\/e255\/48767055\/smoa_4_4_e255.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,19]],"date-time":"2023-01-19T08:52:39Z","timestamp":1674118359000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/smoa\/article\/4\/4\/e255\/6956247"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,30]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esxm.2016.06.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["2050-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2050-1161","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Local Treatment of Penile Prosthesis Infection as Alternative to Immediate Salvage Surgery","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Sexual Medicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.esxm.2016.06.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2016, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}