{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T21:54:19Z","timestamp":1777931659743,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]],"date-time":"2024-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720742400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Foot and Ankle Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,14]],"date-time":"2024-07-14T06:26:38Z","timestamp":1720938398000},"page":"58-64","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparison of four patient reported outcome measures in patients with ankle fracture: A study on patient preferences and psychometric properties"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Per Hviid","family":"Gundtoft","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Julie Ladeby","family":"Erichsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mads","family":"Terndrup","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-1443-4886","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lauritz","family":"Wals\u00f8e","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lasse","family":"Pedersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bjarke","family":"Viberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8245-6890","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alice","family":"\u00d8rts","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3700-289X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Charlotte","family":"Abrahamsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2021.10.008","article-title":"Risk of reoperation in simple ankle fracture surgery when comparing locking plate with nonlocking plate","volume":"61","author":"Jacobsen","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2016.11.002","article-title":"Population-based epidemiology of 9767 ankle fractures","volume":"24","author":"Elsoe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg Off J Eur Soc Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib3","article-title":"The American orthopaedic foot and ankle society ankle-hindfoot scale; translation and validation of the dutch language version for ankle fractures","volume":"7","author":"De Boer","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2015.04.004","article-title":"Inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in registered clinical trials: evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov (2007-2013)","volume":"43","author":"Vodicka","year":"2015","journal-title":"Conte Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-022-03166-3","article-title":"Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient \u2011 reported outcome measures and their measurement properties","volume":"32","author":"Nguyen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2022.03.049","article-title":"The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the literature on traumatic foot fractures: a systematic review","volume":"53","author":"Berk","year":"2022","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2770-2","article-title":"Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures: a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"McKeown","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2011.0841","article-title":"AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems","volume":"32","author":"Pinsker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib9","first-page":"1147","article-title":"COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures","volume":"27","author":"Prinsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib10","article-title":"The positive predictive value of ankle fracture diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry","volume":"69","author":"Gundtoft","year":"2022","journal-title":"Dan Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2015.09.004","article-title":"Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg Off J Eur Soc","volume":"22","author":"Garc\u00e9s","year":"2016","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.94B2.27634","article-title":"Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery","volume":"94","author":"Dawson","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg Br"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1302\/2046-3758.24.2000147","article-title":"The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): development and validation of a summary index score","volume":"2","author":"Morley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Bone Jt Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2012.657579","article-title":"Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS)","volume":"83","author":"C\u00f6ster","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2020.06.014","article-title":"Danish translation and validation of the Self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with ankle related fractures","volume":"27","author":"Erichsen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg Off J Eur Soc Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2019.08.027","article-title":"Danish language version of the American orthopedic foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) in patients with ankle-related fractures","volume":"59","author":"Erichsen","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Foot Ankle Surg Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00435553","article-title":"A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture","volume":"103","author":"Olerud","year":"1984","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arch Fur Orthopadische Und Unf-Chir"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-14-109","article-title":"The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures","volume":"14","author":"Nilsson","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.06.035","article-title":"The \u201cforgotten joint\u201d as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure","volume":"27","author":"Behrend","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplast"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x","article-title":"Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires","volume":"42","author":"Drennan","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib21","series-title":"Cognitive Interviewing","article-title":"Cognitive Interviewing in Practice: Think-Aloud, Verbal Probing, and Other Techniques","author":"Willis","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012","article-title":"Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires","volume":"60","author":"Terwee","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2098","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.23604","article-title":"Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics","volume":"35","author":"Gagnier","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Orthop Res Publ Orthop Res Soc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540118","article-title":"Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives","volume":"6","author":"Hu","year":"1999","journal-title":"Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1111\/1753-6405.12484","article-title":"Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use (5th edition)","volume":"40","year":"2016","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2014.5199","article-title":"Prognosis of physical function following ankle fracture: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"44","author":"Beckenkamp","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-018-2051-5","article-title":"Evaluation of three patient reported outcome measures following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures","volume":"19","author":"Garratt","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib28","first-page":"1969","article-title":"A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases","volume":"26","author":"Jia","year":"2017","journal-title":"Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fas.2018.01.003","article-title":"Comparison of the Manchester\u2013Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery","volume":"25","author":"Arbab","year":"2019","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib30","first-page":"94","article-title":"Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation","volume":"8","author":"Wild","year":"2005","journal-title":"Value Heal J Int Soc Pharm Outcomes Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1177\/10711007211002811","article-title":"The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) during early recovery after ankle fracture","volume":"42","author":"Larsen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Foot Ankle Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib32","first-page":"1101","article-title":"Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Rolstad","year":"2011","journal-title":"Value Heal J Int Soc Pharm Outcomes Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.4103\/sja.sja_163_21","article-title":"How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length","volume":"16","author":"Sharma","year":"2022","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"}],"container-title":["Foot and Ankle Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1268773124001516?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1268773124001516?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]],"date-time":"2024-12-19T16:08:18Z","timestamp":1734624498000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1268773124001516"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S1268773124001516"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1268-7731"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1268-7731","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of four patient reported outcome measures in patients with ankle fracture: A study on patient preferences and psychometric properties","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fas.2024.07.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Foot and Ankle Society.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}