{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T21:06:25Z","timestamp":1792098385493,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,8,1]],"date-time":"2010-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1280620800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,8,1]],"date-time":"2010-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1280620800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4317,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","fertstert.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,5,16]],"date-time":"2009-05-16T08:08:41Z","timestamp":1242461321000},"page":"936-945","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":110,"title":["The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"94","author":[{"given":"Tarek A.","family":"Gelbaya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ioanna","family":"Tsoumpou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luciano G.","family":"Nardo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den014","article-title":"The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"23","author":"Andersen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib2","first-page":"89","article-title":"Risks of obstetric complications in multiple pregnancies: an analysis of more than 400,000 pregnancies in the UK","volume":"6","author":"Sebire","year":"2001","journal-title":"Prenat Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1203\/00006450-200211000-00011","article-title":"The risk of mortality or cerebral palsy in twins: a collaborative population-based study","volume":"52","author":"Scher","year":"2002","journal-title":"Pediatr Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib4","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2001","volume":"51","author":"Martin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)07674-2","article-title":"Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study","volume":"359","author":"Str\u00f6mberg","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.1.88","article-title":"Cost effectiveness analysis of in vitro fertilization: estimated cost per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos","volume":"13","author":"Wolner-Hanssen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60360-2","article-title":"A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilization: a randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"369","author":"Heijnen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib8","unstructured":"SART 2006: www.sartcorsonline.com\/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2681","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei153","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review","volume":"20","author":"Pandian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.9.2392","article-title":"Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth","volume":"14","author":"Vilska","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60695-5","article-title":"Cumulative impact of adding frozen-thawed cycles to single versus double fresh embryo transfers","volume":"15","author":"Lundin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib12","series-title":"Single versus double embryo transfer: a randomised study. Abstracts of the 20th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE","author":"Van Montfoort","year":"302004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2090","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del112","article-title":"Single versus double embryo transfer: cost effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial","volume":"21","author":"Fiddelers","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei332","article-title":"Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial","volume":"21","author":"Eijkemans","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei298","article-title":"Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"21","author":"Kjellberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib16","first-page":"809","article-title":"Reduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation","volume":"152","author":"Heijnen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem372","article-title":"Cost effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint","volume":"23","author":"Polinder","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)56888-5","article-title":"How many embryos should be transferred in in vitro fertilization? A prospective randomized study","volume":"62","author":"Vauthier-Brouzes","year":"1994","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-003-0513-x","article-title":"Prevention of multiple pregnancies by restricting the number of transferred embryos: randomized control study","volume":"270","author":"Komori","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib20","series-title":"Abstracts on the 17th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility","article-title":"Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial","author":"Livingstone","year":"302001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023","article-title":"Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"81","author":"Gardner","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.10.2581","article-title":"Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"14","author":"Gerris","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1900","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.9.1900","article-title":"Finnish ET Study Group. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study","volume":"16","author":"Martikainen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh672","article-title":"Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Lukassen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei359","article-title":"In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"21","author":"Van Montfoort","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60297-0","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction","volume":"17","author":"Moustafa","year":"2008","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub3","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception","volume":"17","author":"Blake","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn045","article-title":"The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Vitthala","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib30","first-page":"1","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice. British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists","volume":"2","author":"Cutting","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del403","article-title":"Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval","volume":"22","author":"Holte","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib32","first-page":"394","article-title":"The construction and application of a prediction model to minimize twin implantation rate at a preserved high pregnancy rate","volume":"19","author":"Holte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.3.504","article-title":"Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study","volume":"16","author":"Ericson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2673","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem173","article-title":"Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer\u2014a questionnaire study","volume":"22","author":"Hojgaard","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.06.043","article-title":"Factors affecting patients' attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer","volume":"87","author":"Newton","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.065","article-title":"Acceptance of single-embryo transfer by patients","volume":"87","author":"Coetzee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61022-X","article-title":"New Belgium embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate","volume":"13","author":"Van Landuyt","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh610","article-title":"Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?","volume":"20","author":"Saldeen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2554","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem171","article-title":"The psychological impact of IVF failure after two or more cycles of IVF with a mild versus standard treatment strategy","volume":"22","author":"de Klerk","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2050","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den219","article-title":"Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study","volume":"23","author":"Verberg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1807","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)66478-1","article-title":"Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment","volume":"365","author":"Fauser","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003_bib42","unstructured":"Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Multiple births and single embryo transfer review 2008. Available at: http:\/\/www.hfea.gov.uk\/en\/483.html Last accessed on November 22, 2008."}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028209008292?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028209008292?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,24]],"date-time":"2024-10-24T04:48:11Z","timestamp":1729745291000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028209008292"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028209008292"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.04.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}