{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T18:28:36Z","timestamp":1781893716497,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,1]],"date-time":"2013-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1359676800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,1]],"date-time":"2013-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1359676800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,2]],"date-time":"2012-11-02T22:07:36Z","timestamp":1351894056000},"page":"496-501.e2","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"99","author":[{"given":"Salvatore","family":"Gizzo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandra","family":"Zambon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlo","family":"Saccardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tito Silvio","family":"Patrelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefania","family":"Di Gangi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monica","family":"Carrozzini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Bertocco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giampiero","family":"Capobianco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Donato","family":"D'Antona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni Battista","family":"Nardelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib1","series-title":"Nascite: gravidanza, parto e allattamento. (Births: pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding, 2006)","author":"Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT)","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)80002-6","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: current opinion","volume":"53","author":"Weinstein","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.544426","article-title":"Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome","volume":"31","author":"Madaan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.10.894","article-title":"Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"202","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib6","series-title":"Williams obstetrics","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90464-X","article-title":"Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus","volume":"347","author":"Rozenberg","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.03.021","article-title":"2D versus 3D transabdominal sonography for the measurement of lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"114","author":"Cheung","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34475-9","article-title":"Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Jastrow","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.014","article-title":"Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment","volume":"201","author":"Bujold","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2012.31.2.239","article-title":"Maternal hydration therapy improves the quantity of amniotic fluid and the pregnancy outcome in third-trimester isolated oligohydramnios: a controlled randomized institutional trial","volume":"31","author":"Patrelli","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1620\/tjem.183.55","article-title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study","volume":"183","author":"Qureshi","year":"1997","journal-title":"Tohoku J Exp Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1384-6","article-title":"Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"283","author":"Kushtagi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib15","first-page":"985","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California","volume":"94","author":"Gregory","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00329-1","article-title":"Is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a safe option in India?","volume":"85","author":"George","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.005","article-title":"Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"34","author":"Landon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.11.1441","article-title":"Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"23","author":"Cheung","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6224","article-title":"Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"33","author":"Martins","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"116","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Landon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib22","first-page":"175","article-title":"Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture","volume":"97","author":"Shipp","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1272\/jnms.67.352","article-title":"Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography","volume":"67","author":"Asakura","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Nihon Med Sch"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.05.022","article-title":"Comparison of transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to measure thickness of the lower uterine segment at term","volume":"107","author":"Marasinghe","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2718","article-title":"Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section","volume":"27","author":"Jastrow","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.07.023","article-title":"Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section","volume":"87","author":"Sen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib27","first-page":"596","article-title":"Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean","volume":"95","author":"Gotoh","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months","volume":"115","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1089\/bfm.2011.0099","article-title":"Epidural analgesia during labor: impact on delivery outcome, neonatal well-being, and early breastfeeding","volume":"7","author":"Gizzo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breastfeed Med"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028212023199?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028212023199?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T08:04:27Z","timestamp":1758009867000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028212023199"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028212023199"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}