{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,21]],"date-time":"2026-08-21T14:04:37Z","timestamp":1787321077036,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,1]],"date-time":"2015-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433116800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,1]],"date-time":"2015-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433116800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2552,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009633","name":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009633","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,4,14]],"date-time":"2015-04-14T02:39:39Z","timestamp":1428979179000},"page":"1454-1460.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"103","author":[{"given":"Kate","family":"Devine","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew T.","family":"Connell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin S.","family":"Richter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christina I.","family":"Ramirez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eric D.","family":"Levens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alan H.","family":"DeCherney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert J.","family":"Stillman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5540-9362","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eric A.","family":"Widra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2218","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1301467","article-title":"Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States","volume":"369","author":"Kulkarni","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200006000-00022","article-title":"Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations","volume":"95","author":"Conde-Agudelo","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.005","article-title":"Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States","volume":"209","author":"Lemos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.02.070","article-title":"Optimizing embryo selection with day 5 transfer","volume":"93","author":"Reh","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00438-X","article-title":"Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers","volume":"69","author":"Gardner","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in\u00a0vitro fertilitzation","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep042","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF\/ICSI","volume":"24","author":"Veleva","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018","article-title":"Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer","volume":"102","author":"Shapiro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib11","first-page":"CD003416","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer following in\u00a0vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection","volume":"7","author":"Pandian","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei298","article-title":"Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"21","author":"Thurin Kjellberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.09.023","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice","volume":"92","author":"Stillman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.06.043","article-title":"Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one","volume":"96","author":"Csokmay","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-008-9275-5","article-title":"Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer","volume":"25","author":"Yanaihara","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-011-9551-7","article-title":"Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers","volume":"28","author":"Berin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.051","article-title":"Choosing the main outcome of an infertility trial is harder than you think","volume":"101","author":"Legro","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.027","article-title":"Infertility trial outcomes: healthy moms and babies","volume":"101","author":"Silver","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib19","series-title":"In\u00a0vitro culture of human blastocyst","author":"Gardner","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib20","first-page":"345","article-title":"Vitrifying and warming of human oocytes, embryos, and blastocysts: vitrification procedures as an alternative to conventional cryopreservation","volume":"254","author":"Liebermann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Methods Mol Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60820-4","article-title":"National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications","volume":"379","author":"Blencowe","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib22","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: preliminary data for 2012","volume":"62","author":"Hamilton","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"90","author":"Loutradi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S27","DOI":"10.1016\/S0143-4004(03)00133-4","article-title":"Implantation potential and clinical impact of cryopreservation\u2014a review","volume":"24","author":"Kolibianakis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.03.105","article-title":"Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers","volume":"94","author":"Fauque","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025","article-title":"Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan","volume":"101","author":"Ishihara","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.064","article-title":"Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in\u00a0vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos","volume":"87","author":"Richter","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00685.x","article-title":"Evaluation of cycle-to-cycle variation of endometrial responsiveness using transvaginal sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction","volume":"19","author":"Basir","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2092","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq125","article-title":"Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in\u00a0vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles","volume":"25","author":"Bosch","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.11.030","article-title":"A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women","volume":"81","author":"Murray","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2633","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del247","article-title":"Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer","volume":"21","author":"De Sutter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37957.560278.EE","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies","volume":"328","author":"Helmerhorst","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu027","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence","volume":"20","author":"Evans","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Jackson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa010806","article-title":"Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology","volume":"346","author":"Schieve","year":"2002","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1144","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000127037.12652.76","article-title":"Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States","volume":"103","author":"Schieve","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei378","article-title":"Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women","volume":"21","author":"DeGeyter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei424","article-title":"The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies","volume":"21","author":"De Neubourg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.048","article-title":"Birth weight is lower for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome: a case-control study","volume":"90","author":"Shebl","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.11.015","article-title":"Adverse obstetric outcome for the vanishing twin syndrome","volume":"20","author":"Almog","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028215001624?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028215001624?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T17:28:25Z","timestamp":1771435705000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028215001624"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028215001624"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}