{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T18:00:50Z","timestamp":1787508050267,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,1]],"date-time":"2015-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433116800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,6,1]],"date-time":"2015-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1433116800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2552,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,6]],"date-time":"2015-05-06T16:31:20Z","timestamp":1430929880000},"page":"e37-e43","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":75,"title":["Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"103","member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00014-X","article-title":"Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage","volume":"5","author":"Honore","year":"1999","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.041","article-title":"Race, insurance status, and desire for tubal sterilization reversal","volume":"90","author":"Borrero","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01558-2","article-title":"Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: \ufb01ndings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization","volume":"74","author":"Schmidt","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199410000-00028","article-title":"Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective","volume":"49","author":"Chi","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml030","article-title":"Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening","volume":"12","author":"den Hartog","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.08.041","article-title":"Optimal evaluation of the infertile female","volume":"86","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2003-39990","article-title":"Evidence-based medicine for diagnostic questions","volume":"21","author":"Evers","year":"2003","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00415-5","article-title":"A second hysterosalpingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction","volume":"73","author":"Dessole","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59413-8","article-title":"Histology of proximal tubal occlusion","volume":"48","author":"Sulak","year":"1987","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.5.1237","article-title":"Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome","volume":"14","author":"Mol","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib11","first-page":"CD003718","article-title":"Tubal flushing for subfertility","author":"Johnson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.001","article-title":"Hysterosalpingo-constrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency","volume":"105","author":"Hamed","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802695959","article-title":"Con\ufb01rmation of tubal patency in hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy","volume":"88","author":"Ahinko-Hakamaa","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1272471","article-title":"Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy","volume":"29","author":"Catenacci","year":"2011","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib15","unstructured":"Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Clinic summary report. Available at: https:\/\/www.sartcorsonline.com\/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0. Accessed April 22, 2015."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib16","first-page":"CD006415","article-title":"Surgery for tubal infertility","author":"Pandian","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh593","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects\u2014a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Hansen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30527-8","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"McDonald","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000114989.84822.51","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in\u00a0vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Jackson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/bdra.20645","article-title":"Congenital malformations in infants born after in\u00a0vitro fertilization in Sweden","volume":"88","author":"K\u00e4ll\u00e9n","year":"2010","journal-title":"Birth Defects Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.080","article-title":"Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction","volume":"92","author":"El-Chaar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54651-2","article-title":"Histology of proximal tubal obstruction in cases of unsuccessful tubal canalization","volume":"56","author":"Letterie","year":"1991","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1097\/01.RVI.0000052293.26939.10","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes after fallopian tube recanalization: oil-based versus water-soluble contrast agents","volume":"14","author":"Pinto","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Vasc Interven Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.11.187","article-title":"Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography","volume":"88","author":"Farhi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7","article-title":"The American Fertility Society classi\ufb01cations of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions","volume":"49","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)90384-J","article-title":"Treatment-dependent and treatment-independent pregnancy among women with periadnexal adhesions","volume":"162","author":"Tulandi","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00484-6","article-title":"The signi\ufb01cance of hydrosalpinx in in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"69","author":"Nackley","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60479-3","article-title":"Laparoscopic treatment of hydrosalpinx: factors affecting pregnancy rates","volume":"7","author":"Milingos","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1196\/annals.1365.017","article-title":"Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx","volume":"1092","author":"Bontis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann NY Acad Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00200-3","article-title":"Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in\u00a0vitro fertilization\u2014embryo transfer","volume":"70","author":"Zeyneloglu","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.5.1243","article-title":"Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies","volume":"14","author":"Camus","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.089","article-title":"Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"90","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2762","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/14.11.2762","article-title":"Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF","volume":"14","author":"Strandell","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1696","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.6.1696","article-title":"Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization","volume":"13","author":"de Wit","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1020","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00077-6","article-title":"Does previous salpingectomy improve implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with severe tubal factor infertility who are undergoing in\u00a0vitro fertilization? A pilot prospective randomized study","volume":"69","author":"Dechaud","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.032","article-title":"Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in\u00a0vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx","volume":"86","author":"Kontoravdis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib37","first-page":"CD002125","article-title":"Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in\u00a0vitro fertilisation","author":"Johnson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90269-0","article-title":"Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"56","author":"Kassabji","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00447-0","article-title":"The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in\u00a0vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and the bene\ufb01t of surgical correction","volume":"69","author":"Murray","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1093\/HUMREP\/11.3.523","article-title":"Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx","volume":"11","author":"Shelton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1159\/000010201","article-title":"Salpingectomy for unilateral hydrosalpinx may improve in\u00a0vivo fecundity","volume":"48","author":"Choe","year":"1999","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.4.1099","article-title":"Spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy following salpingectomy for a unilateral hydrosalpinx","volume":"17","author":"Aboulghar","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2634","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg509","article-title":"Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy","volume":"18","author":"Sagoskin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2175","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg411","article-title":"Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy","volume":"18","author":"Chan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.1.142","article-title":"Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in arti\ufb01cial reproductive technology patients","volume":"15","author":"Dar","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.6.1135","article-title":"Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment","volume":"16","author":"Strandell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.107671","article-title":"Cauterization of hydrosalpinges before in\u00a0vitro fertilization is an effective surgical treatment associated with improved pregnancy rates","volume":"183","author":"Stadtmauer","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00801.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic proximal tubal division can preserve ovarian reserve for infertility patients with hydrosalpinges","volume":"34","author":"Nakagawa","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00487-3","article-title":"Effect of tubal sterilization on ovarian follicular reserve and function","volume":"189","author":"Carmona","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00410-9","article-title":"The changes in ovarian hormone levels and ovarian artery blood flow rate after laparoscopic tubal sterilization","volume":"99","author":"Bulent Tiras","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.12.012","article-title":"The effect of tubal sterilization through electrocoagulation on the ovarian reserve","volume":"80","author":"Goynumer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.11.022","article-title":"Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in\u00a0vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with a contraindication for laparoscopy","volume":"93","author":"Mijatovic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701714893","article-title":"Is there a role for hysteroscopic tubal occlusion of functionless hydrosalpinges prior to IVF\/ICSI in modern practice?","volume":"86","author":"Darwish","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.10.005","article-title":"Tissue encapsulation of the proximal Essure micro-insert from the uterine cavity following hysteroscopic sterilization","volume":"14","author":"Kerin","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Min Invas Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2147","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2147","article-title":"Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?","volume":"12","author":"Sowter","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.3.736","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles","volume":"13","author":"Van Voorhis","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den071","article-title":"Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"Hammadieh","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1121","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00425-2","article-title":"Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases","volume":"72","author":"Yoon","year":"1999","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60329-5","article-title":"Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy","volume":"8","author":"Cha","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gyn Laparosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000264591.43544.0f","article-title":"Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy","volume":"109","author":"Rodgers","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1392","article-title":"Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness","volume":"90","author":"Dharia Patel","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.028","article-title":"Clinical factors determining pregnancy outcome after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis","volume":"92","author":"Gordts","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136108","article-title":"Sterilization reversal: fertility results","volume":"10","author":"Dubuisson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00339-7","article-title":"A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals","volume":"68","author":"Kim","year":"1997","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)53362-7","article-title":"Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in the Netherlands","volume":"53","author":"Trimbos-Kemper","year":"1990","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01240.x","article-title":"Live birth following day surgery reversal of female sterilization in women older than 40 years: a realistic option in Australia?","volume":"187","author":"Petrucco","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2660","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem248","article-title":"Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF?","volume":"22","author":"Boeckxstaens","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001502821500237X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001502821500237X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,18]],"date-time":"2026-02-18T17:27:38Z","timestamp":1771435658000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001502821500237X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"references-count":67,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S001502821500237X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.032","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}