{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T06:52:34Z","timestamp":1780383154954,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,1]],"date-time":"2015-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1441065600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2460,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","fertstert.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,7]],"date-time":"2015-07-07T05:51:41Z","timestamp":1436248301000},"page":"688-697.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Reliability of the European Society of\u00a0Human Reproduction and Embryology\/European Society for\u00a0Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for\u00a0congenital uterine anomalies detected\u00a0using three-dimensional ultrasonography"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"104","author":[{"given":"Artur","family":"Ludwin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Inga","family":"Ludwin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marek","family":"Kudla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"Kottner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)44114-2","article-title":"Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases)","volume":"32","author":"Buttram","year":"1979","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7","article-title":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, M\u00fcllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions","volume":"49","author":"Buttram","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr021","article-title":"The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system","volume":"17","author":"Aci\u00e9n","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-011-0724-2","article-title":"Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations","volume":"9","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1136\/qhc.12.1.47","article-title":"Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies","volume":"12","author":"Eccles","year":"2003","journal-title":"Qual Saf Health Care"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib6","first-page":"CD008576","article-title":"Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus","author":"Kowalik","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.09.010","article-title":"Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Valle","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu047","article-title":"ART and uterine pathology: how relevant is the maternal side for implantation?","volume":"21","author":"Galliano","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","article-title":"Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"29","author":"Venetis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2277","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.10.2277","article-title":"Reproductive impact of congenital M\u0171llerian anomalies","volume":"12","author":"Raga","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/7.2.161","article-title":"Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results","volume":"7","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn018","article-title":"Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal","volume":"14","author":"Saravelos","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","article-title":"The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Chan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.04.043","article-title":"M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population","volume":"102","author":"Dreisler","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib15","first-page":"1099","article-title":"Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening","volume":"98","author":"Woelfer","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.127","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"21","author":"Salim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.02.030","article-title":"Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system","volume":"94","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8968","article-title":"Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment","volume":"37","author":"Jayaprakasan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00480-X","article-title":"The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome","volume":"73","author":"Homer","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331020777","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues","volume":"233","author":"Troiano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7551","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"35","author":"Bermejo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.09.011","article-title":"Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri","volume":"20","author":"Ludwin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu344","article-title":"Comparison of the ESHRE\u2013ESGE and ASRM classifications of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice","volume":"30","author":"Ludwin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","article-title":"The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies","volume":"28","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002","article-title":"Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed","volume":"64","author":"Kottner","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-22","article-title":"The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content","volume":"10","author":"Mokkink","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"92","author":"Ghi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrnm.2014.04.001","article-title":"Septate or bicornuate uterus: accuracy of three-dimensional trans-vaginal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"45","author":"Abo Dewan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1392","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.01.039","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography relative to office hysteroscopy and its interrater\/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty","volume":"101","author":"Ludwin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1420","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu110","article-title":"Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty","volume":"29","author":"Ludwin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14825","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies compared to magnetic resonance imaging using the ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract","author":"Graupera","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1970","DOI":"10.1111\/jan.12402","article-title":"Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing","volume":"70","author":"Streiner","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib33","unstructured":"European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). Minimum training requirements for the practice of medical ultrasound in Europe. Available at: www.efsumb.org\/guidelines\/2009-04-14apx1.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2014."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu001","article-title":"Are the ESHRE\/ESGE criteria of female genital anomalies for diagnosis of septate uterus appropriate?","volume":"29","author":"Ludwin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu002","article-title":"Reply: Are the ESHRE\/ESGE criteria of female genital anomalies for diagnosis of septate uterus appropriate?","volume":"29","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13320","article-title":"Interpreting reproducibility results for ultrasound measurements","volume":"43","author":"Martins","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.12.001","article-title":"The difference between reliability and agreement","volume":"64","author":"Kottner","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","article-title":"The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data","volume":"33","author":"Landis","year":"1977","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib40","series-title":"Practical statistics for medical research","author":"Altman","year":"1991"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib41","series-title":"Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5","author":"Deeks","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1191\/0962280205sm413oa","article-title":"Assessing the reliability of ordered categorical scales using kappa-type statistics","volume":"14","author":"Roberts","year":"2005","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7757","article-title":"Analysis and acquisition reproducibility of 3D power Doppler","volume":"36","author":"Martins","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00180.x","article-title":"Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging","volume":"16","author":"Nelson","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2211001390","article-title":"Changes in myometrial and junctional zone thickness and signal intensity: demonstration with kinematic T2-weighted MR imaging","volume":"221","author":"Masui","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib46","unstructured":"Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Diagnostic rate and accuracy of the ESHRE-ESGE classification for septate uterus and other common uterine malformations\u2014Why we do not see, that the King is naked? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. In press."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.027","article-title":"The international agreement study on the diagnosis of the septate uterus at office hysteroscopy in infertile patients","volume":"99","author":"Smit","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01304.x","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus","volume":"37","author":"Ludwin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019242","article-title":"Residual uterine septum of less than 1 cm after hysteroscopic metroplasty does not impair reproductive outcome","volume":"11","author":"Fedele","year":"1996","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg030","article-title":"A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in woman with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage","volume":"18","author":"Salim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001502821500446X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S001502821500446X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,23]],"date-time":"2022-10-23T00:34:51Z","timestamp":1666485291000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S001502821500446X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S001502821500446X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Reliability of the European Society of\u00a0Human Reproduction and Embryology\/European Society for\u00a0Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for\u00a0congenital uterine anomalies detected\u00a0using three-dimensional ultrasonography","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.06.019","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}