{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T06:35:16Z","timestamp":1780468516012,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,1]],"date-time":"2016-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1467331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,1]],"date-time":"2016-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1467331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2156,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100002603","name":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100002603","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009633","name":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R25HD075737"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R25HD075737"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009633","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,18]],"date-time":"2016-03-18T04:16:58Z","timestamp":1458274618000},"page":"80-89","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004\u20132012"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"106","author":[{"given":"Aaron K.","family":"Styer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0405-8133","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Barbara","family":"Luke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wendy","family":"Vitek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mindy S.","family":"Christianson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valerie L.","family":"Baker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alicia Y.","family":"Christy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alex J.","family":"Polotsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1832","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.19.1832","article-title":"Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"282","author":"Schieve","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib2","first-page":"387","article-title":"Effect of embryo transfer number on singleton and twin implantation pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology","volume":"55","author":"Luke","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.005","article-title":"Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States","volume":"209","author":"Lemos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2060","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1988.03720140004003","article-title":"Fertility specialists seeking better recipe for in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"259","author":"Raymond","year":"1988","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa013491","article-title":"Insurance coverage and outcomes of in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"347","author":"Jain","year":"2002","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.111.S1.1159","article-title":"Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997\u20132000","volume":"111","author":"Reynolds","year":"2003","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1140","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.6.1140","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation","volume":"16","author":"Tiitinen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib8","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2013United States, 2010","volume":"62","author":"Sunderam","year":"2013","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib9","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2013United States, 2011","volume":"63","author":"Sunderam","year":"2014","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.15585\/mmwr.ss6411a1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2013United States, 2012","volume":"64","author":"Sunderam","year":"2015","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib11","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology surveillance\u2013United States, 2009","volume":"61","author":"Sunderam","year":"2012","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2014.03.001","article-title":"Multiple pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies\u2013a happy consequence or double trouble?","volume":"19","author":"Murray","year":"2014","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000106","article-title":"National ART Surveillance System Group. Number of embryos transferred after in\u00a0vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome","volume":"123","author":"Kissin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61022-X","article-title":"New Belgian embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate","volume":"13","author":"Van Landuyt","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib16","first-page":"S1","article-title":"Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred","volume":"82","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib17","first-page":"1070","article-title":"Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States","volume":"370","author":"Kulkarni","year":"2014","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2440","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMe048268","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer\u2013has its time arrived?","volume":"351","author":"Davis","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des401","article-title":"The irrational attraction of elective single-embryo transfer (eSET)","volume":"28","author":"Gleicher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.10.029","article-title":"Keeping clinicians in clinical research: the Clinical Research\/Reproductive Scientist Training Program","volume":"91","author":"Armstrong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib21","series-title":"2012 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer","volume":"97","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.05.036","article-title":"Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome","volume":"89","author":"Styer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.05.015","article-title":"Embryo transfer practices and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status","volume":"104","author":"Boulet","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32834551cd","article-title":"Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis","volume":"23","author":"Bromer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.02966.x","article-title":"Minimising twins in in\u00a0vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon","volume":"118","author":"Scotland","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu067","article-title":"Universal coverage of IVF pays off","volume":"29","author":"Velez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del026","article-title":"The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer","volume":"21","author":"Gleicher","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa053524","article-title":"In\u00a0vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos","volume":"354","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001","article-title":"A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates","volume":"88","author":"Ryan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.05.035","article-title":"The desire of infertile patients for multiple births","volume":"81","author":"Ryan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701855670","article-title":"Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples","volume":"87","author":"Van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2718","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den327","article-title":"Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey","volume":"23","author":"van Peperstraten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-013-0100-4","article-title":"Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): a national study","volume":"30","author":"Thompson","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.134","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome\u2013United States, 1999 to 2010","volume":"99","author":"Steinberg","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep042","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF\/ICSI","volume":"24","author":"Veleva","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.3109\/09513590.2011.633662","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer and cumulative pregnancy rate: five-year experience in a southern European country","volume":"28","author":"Rodriguez Barredo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den169","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study","volume":"23","author":"Boulet","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.07.033","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived following IVF\/ICSI treatment compared with spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies","volume":"181","author":"Geisler","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.031","article-title":"Multiple births following in\u00a0vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success","volume":"170","author":"Umranikar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1064","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1360","article-title":"Redefining in\u00a0vitro fertilization success: should triplets be considered failures?","volume":"90","author":"Grunfeld","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.04.006","article-title":"Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in\u00a0vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception","volume":"104","author":"Luke","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib43","first-page":"CD003416","article-title":"Number of embryos for transfer following in\u00a0vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection","author":"Pandian","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1242","article-title":"Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology","volume":"102","author":"Luke","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1608","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037","article-title":"Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading","volume":"86","author":"Baxter Bendus","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1217","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des020","article-title":"Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates","volume":"27","author":"Forman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.03.039","article-title":"Follow-Up Team. Behavioral and cognitive development as well as family functioning of twins conceived by assisted reproduction: findings from a large population study","volume":"84","author":"Olivennes","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00659-9","article-title":"Social stigma and compounded losses: quality-of-life issues for multiple-birth families","volume":"80","author":"Ellison","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028216300073?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028216300073?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,17]],"date-time":"2026-01-17T20:16:03Z","timestamp":1768680963000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028216300073"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028216300073"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004\u20132012","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a92016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}