{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T17:51:57Z","timestamp":1770745917530,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,1]],"date-time":"2016-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1470009600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,27]],"date-time":"2022-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1653609600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2125,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","fertstert.org","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,10]],"date-time":"2016-05-10T04:20:06Z","timestamp":1462854006000},"page":"354-362.e2","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"106","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3379-5359","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kevin S.","family":"Richter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniella K.","family":"Ginsburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sharon K.","family":"Shipley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josh","family":"Lim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael J.","family":"Tucker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James R.","family":"Graham","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael J.","family":"Levy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh540","article-title":"Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super-cooling ultra-rapid vitrification","volume":"20","author":"Huang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61169-8","article-title":"Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination","volume":"11","author":"Kuwayama","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61298-9","article-title":"Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezing of human blastocysts","volume":"11","author":"Stehlik","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-009-9369-8","article-title":"Vitrification of human embryos subjected to blastomere biopsy for pre-implantation genetic screening produces higher survival and pregnancy rates than slow freezing","volume":"26","author":"Keskintepe","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.2478\/v10042-008-0092-6","article-title":"Vitrification vs. slow cooling protocol using embryos cryopreserved in the 5th or 6th day after oocyte retrieval and IVF outcomes","volume":"48","author":"Kuc","year":"2010","journal-title":"Folia Histochem Cytobiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib6","first-page":"119","article-title":"Phasing-in of vitrification into routine practice: why, how, and what","volume":"17","author":"Wong","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.01.029","article-title":"Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application","volume":"86","author":"Liebermann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib8","series-title":"Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999","first-page":"378","article-title":"In\u00a0vitro culture of human blastocysts","author":"Gardner","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib9","first-page":"325","article-title":"Conventional technologies for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos","volume":"254","author":"Tucker","year":"2004","journal-title":"Methods Mol Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib10","first-page":"345","article-title":"Vitrifying and warming of human oocytes, embryos, and blastocysts: vitrification procedures as an alternative to conventional cryopreservation","volume":"254","author":"Liebermann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Methods Mol Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.06.021","article-title":"Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and transferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates","volume":"100","author":"Kovalevsky","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.10.029","article-title":"Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles","volume":"90","author":"Levens","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.02.114","article-title":"Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos","volume":"86","author":"Richter","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092","article-title":"Contrasting patterns in in\u00a0vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony","volume":"89","author":"Shapiro","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","article-title":"Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers","volume":"83","author":"Barrenetxea","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00567-7","article-title":"Transfer of nonassisted hatched and hatching human blastocysts after in\u00a0vitro fertilization","volume":"74","author":"Khorram","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01771-X","article-title":"A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers","volume":"75","author":"Shapiro","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60049-1","article-title":"Morphology of vitrified\/warmed day-5 embryos predicts rates of implantation, pregnancy and live birth","volume":"19","author":"Ebner","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq374","article-title":"Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy","volume":"26","author":"Van Landuyt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028216611147?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028216611147?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,23]],"date-time":"2022-10-23T06:07:43Z","timestamp":1666505263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028216611147"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028216611147"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.04.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a92016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}