{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T07:19:22Z","timestamp":1791530362778,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,1]],"date-time":"2022-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643673600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,1]],"date-time":"2022-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1643673600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007698","name":"University of Florida","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007698","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,19]],"date-time":"2021-11-19T11:24:55Z","timestamp":1637321095000},"page":"339-348","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016\u20132018"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"117","author":[{"given":"Robert Stan","family":"Williams","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dorothy D.","family":"Ellis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth A.","family":"Wilkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph M.","family":"Kramer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susmita","family":"Datta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David S.","family":"Guzick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028","article-title":"Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline","volume":"99","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.11.058","article-title":"Initial experience with a donor egg bank","volume":"88","author":"Akin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.10.047","article-title":"Egg banking in the United States: current status of commercially available cryopreserved oocytes","volume":"99","author":"Quass","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.07.013","article-title":"The current status of oocyte banks: domestic and international perspectives","volume":"110","author":"Quaas","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2239","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq146","article-title":"Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial","volume":"25","author":"Cobo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1017-0","article-title":"Egg donation of vitrified oocytes bank produces similar pregnancy rates by blastocyst transfer when compared to fresh cycle","volume":"34","author":"Domingues","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der008","article-title":"Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program","volume":"26","author":"Garc\u00eda","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.3109\/09513590.2014.945785","article-title":"Comparative efficiency study of fresh and vitrified oocytes in egg donation programs for different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols","volume":"30","author":"Kalugina","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/1757-2215-6-15","article-title":"Optimized protocol for cryopreservation of human eggs improves developmental competence and implantation of resulting embryos","volume":"6","author":"Wang","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1996","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.035","article-title":"Comparison outcome of fresh and vitrified donor oocytes in an egg-sharing donation program","volume":"95","author":"Trokoudes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-017-0378-4","article-title":"New national outcome data on fresh versus cryopreserved donor oocytes","volume":"11","author":"Kushnir","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024","article-title":"Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in\u00a0vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline","volume":"116","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib14","series-title":"2012 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.10.015","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing recipient body mass index: an analysis of 22,317 fresh donor\/recipient cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System registry","volume":"105","author":"Provost","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2720","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det292","article-title":"IVF outcomes in obese donor oocyte recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Jungheim","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib17","first-page":"25","article-title":"Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes","volume":"1","author":"Setton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib18","first-page":"58","article-title":"The effects of oocyte donor and recipient body mass index on live birth rates and pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproduction","volume":"2","author":"Xu","year":"2021","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.01.056","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes decline in recipients over age 44: an analysis of\u00a027,959 fresh donor oocyte in\u00a0vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology","volume":"101","author":"Yeh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1038","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(02)03371-X","article-title":"Clinical outcomes among recipients of donated eggs: an analysis of the US national experience, 1996-1998","volume":"78","author":"Toner","year":"2002","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.106336","article-title":"A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program","volume":"5","author":"Gupta","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.02.107","article-title":"Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion","volume":"107","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028221021294?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028221021294?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T08:32:46Z","timestamp":1758011566000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028221021294"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028221021294"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry in 2016\u20132018","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.10.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a92021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}