{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T17:52:41Z","timestamp":1786989161170,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,1]],"date-time":"2022-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1659312000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100002603","name":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100002603","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]],"date-time":"2022-09-26T07:28:59Z","timestamp":1664177339000},"page":"875-884","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in\u00a0vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"118","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4418-4203","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jennifer B.","family":"Bakkensen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kerry S.J.","family":"Flannagan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunni L.","family":"Mumford","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne P.","family":"Hutchinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elaine O.","family":"Cheung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patricia I.","family":"Moreno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neil","family":"Jordan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eve C.","family":"Feinberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kara N.","family":"Goldman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"First births to older women continue to rise","volume":"152","author":"Matthews","year":"2014","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2018","volume":"68","author":"Martin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1956.02970090081016","article-title":"Factors affecting normal expectancy of conception","volume":"161","author":"Guttmacher","year":"1956","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)32587-0","article-title":"Reproductive span and rate of reproduction among Hutterite women","volume":"8","author":"Tietze","year":"1957","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"404","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198202183060706","article-title":"Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands","volume":"306","author":"Schwartz","year":"1982","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.12.032","article-title":"Female age-related fertility decline","volume":"101","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib7","unstructured":"Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Clinic summary report: all SART member clinics [Internet]. Birmingham, AL: Available from: https:\/\/www.sartcorsonline.com\/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx. Accessed April 1, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.05.080","article-title":"Frozen eggs: national autologous oocyte thaw outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Kawwass","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028","article-title":"Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline","volume":"99","author":"Practice Committees of the American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Reproductive Technology","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa320","article-title":"A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection","volume":"36","author":"Johnston","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.08.027","article-title":"Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion","volume":"110","author":"Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1606","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des088","article-title":"Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study","volume":"27","author":"Rienzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002","article-title":"Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013","volume":"107","author":"Crawford","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.040","article-title":"Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis?","volume":"100","author":"Goldman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026","article-title":"Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in\u00a0vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval","volume":"105","author":"Doyle","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq042","article-title":"Embryo development and gestation using fresh and vitrified oocytes","volume":"25","author":"Almodin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20150030","article-title":"Vitrification of human oocytes and its contribution to in\u00a0vitro fertilization programs","volume":"19","author":"Almodin","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Bras Reprod Assist"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024","article-title":"Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in\u00a0vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline","volume":"116","author":"The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-017-0228-7","article-title":"The human oocyte preservation experience (HOPE) registry: evaluation of cryopreservation techniques and oocyte source on outcomes","volume":"15","author":"Nagy","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.03.010","article-title":"Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing","volume":"107","author":"Milman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.12.029","article-title":"Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis","volume":"97","author":"Hirshfeld-Cytron","year":"2012","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3054","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der284","article-title":"Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing","volume":"26","author":"Van Loendersloot","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.002","article-title":"Optimal timing for elective egg freezing","volume":"103","author":"Mesen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.02.029","article-title":"Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth","volume":"103","author":"Devine","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial","volume":"112","author":"Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib26","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta, GA,\u00a02019."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.06.024","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and utilization from over a decade of planned oocyte cryopreservation","volume":"43","author":"Leung","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.01.011","article-title":"Planned oocyte cryopreservation\u201410\u201315-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes","volume":"115","author":"Blakemore","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.028","article-title":"The impact of female age and nulligravidity on fecundity in an older reproductive age cohort","volume":"105","author":"Steiner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(80)91991-1","article-title":"Fetal loss after implantation: a prospective study","volume":"2","author":"Miller","year":"1980","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004","article-title":"The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening","volume":"101","author":"Franasiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.01.025","article-title":"Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening","volume":"105","author":"Demko","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002","article-title":"Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers","volume":"115","author":"Pirtea","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey346","article-title":"To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)","volume":"34","author":"Murphy","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02078-4","article-title":"Utilization of preimplantation genetic testing in the USA","volume":"38","author":"Roche","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa034","article-title":"The status of preimplantation genetic testing in the UK and USA","volume":"35","author":"Theobald","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02365-0","article-title":"Embryo attrition in planned PGT-A: predicting the number of available blastocysts for transfer","volume":"39","author":"Gordon","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib38","author":"Saad"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1303-5","article-title":"Achieving the \u201cideal\u201d family size at advanced reproductive ages through oocyte cryopreservation","volume":"36","author":"DeVore","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1574","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.03.012","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and over Treatment Trial (FORT-T)","volume":"101","author":"Goldman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib41","first-page":"1","article-title":"Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study","volume":"364","author":"Magnus","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1649","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.6.1649","article-title":"Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study","volume":"17","author":"De La Rochebrochard","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1708","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7251.1708","article-title":"Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study","volume":"320","author":"Andersen","year":"2000","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.03.029","article-title":"After the thaw: when patients return to use cryopreserved oocytes","volume":"115","author":"Bakkensen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028222004782?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028222004782?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,3]],"date-time":"2025-11-03T06:16:55Z","timestamp":1762150615000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028222004782"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028222004782"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0015-0282","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in\u00a0vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.07.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a92022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}