{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T14:50:06Z","timestamp":1758120606689,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,1]],"date-time":"2024-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706745600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009633","name":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009633","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","fertstert.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,23]],"date-time":"2022-12-23T15:19:13Z","timestamp":1671808753000},"page":"186-194","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer: new approach to minimize the limitations of using national surveillance data for clinical research"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"119","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6617-0035","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marissa Steinberg","family":"Weiss","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chongliang","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yujia","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yong","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dmitry M.","family":"Kissin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Glen A.","family":"Satten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kurt T.","family":"Barnhart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32843-5","article-title":"Frozen vs. fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial","volume":"393","author":"Wei","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2443","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-020-01934-z","article-title":"A freeze-all strategy does not increase live birth rates in women of advanced reproductive age","volume":"37","author":"Lattes","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0234481","article-title":"Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?","volume":"15","author":"Boynukalin","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1177\/1933719115597768","article-title":"Why prospectively randomized clinical trials have been rare in reproductive medicine and will remain so?","volume":"23","author":"Gleicher","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2355","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu224","article-title":"A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse","volume":"29","author":"Evers","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib6","series-title":"Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance","first-page":"47","article-title":"Using ART surveillance data in clinical research","author":"Baker","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.037","article-title":"Large randomized controlled trials in infertility","volume":"113","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0046544","article-title":"Time to pregnancy: a computational method for using the duration of non-conception for predicting conception","volume":"7","author":"Sozou","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"year":"2019","series-title":"Assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic success rates report","key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib9"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib10","unstructured":"H.R.4773 - Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. In: Public Law No 102-493, October 24, 1992. Available at: https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/102nd-congress\/house-bill\/4773. Accessed December 20, 2022."},{"year":"2018","series-title":"Assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic success rates report","key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib11"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02078-4","article-title":"Utilization of preimplantation genetic testing in the USA","volume":"38","author":"Roche","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwh090","article-title":"A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data","volume":"159","author":"Zou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.2147\/CLEP.S129785","article-title":"Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research","volume":"9","author":"Pedersen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.22237\/jmasm\/1493599140","article-title":"Using multiple imputation to address the inconsistent distribution of a controlling variable when modeling an infrequent outcome","volume":"16","author":"Zhang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Mod Appl Stat Methods"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2000.10474263","article-title":"Estimating and using propensity scores with partially missing data","volume":"95","author":"D'Agostino","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3066","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216674296","article-title":"Comments on propensity score matching following multiple imputation","volume":"25","author":"Penning de Vries","year":"2016","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib18","article-title":"A comparison of approaches to implementing propensity score methods following multiple imputation","volume":"14","author":"Penning de Vries","year":"2017","journal-title":"Epidemiol Biostat Public Health"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1217","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.38.9.1217","article-title":"To be or not to be? That is conception! Managing in\u00a0vitro fertilization programs","volume":"38","author":"Kaplan","year":"1992","journal-title":"Manag Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib20","first-page":"CD011184","article-title":"Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction","volume":"2","author":"Zaat","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.05.010","article-title":"Comparison of perinatal outcomes after frozen or fresh embryo transfer: separate analyses of singleton, twin, and sibling live births from a linked national in\u00a0vitro fertilization registry","volume":"118","author":"Raja","year":"2022","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002","article-title":"Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers","volume":"115","author":"Pirtea","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305","article-title":"Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"36","author":"Wong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Fertility and Sterility"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028222019719?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0015028222019719?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T08:38:18Z","timestamp":1758011898000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0015028222019719"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0015028222019719"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0015-0282"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0015-0282"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer: new approach to minimize the limitations of using national surveillance data for clinical research","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Fertility and Sterility","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a92022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}