{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T16:59:06Z","timestamp":1785344346109,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,8,1]],"date-time":"2010-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1280620800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,8,1]],"date-time":"2010-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1280620800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","giejournal.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gastrointestinal Endoscopy"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,6,20]],"date-time":"2010-06-20T20:24:51Z","timestamp":1277065491000},"page":"328-336","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":95,"title":["A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Douglas K.","family":"Rex","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jack A.","family":"Di Palma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reynaldo","family":"Rodriguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"McGowan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Cleveland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200309043491020","article-title":"Acute phosphate nephropathy and renal failure","volume":"349","author":"Desmeules","year":"2003","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.5858\/2006-130-101-RFANAW","article-title":"Renal failure and nephrocalcinosis associated with oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing: clinical patterns and renal biopsy findings","volume":"130","author":"Gonlusen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3389","DOI":"10.1681\/ASN.2005050496","article-title":"Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure","volume":"16","author":"Markowitz","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Am Soc Nephrol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1016\/0016-5085(80)90781-7","article-title":"Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion","volume":"78","author":"Davis","year":"1980","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2275","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2009.389","article-title":"A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy","volume":"104","author":"DiPalma","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1038\/ajg.2008.124","article-title":"Intestinal and renal effects of low-volume phosphate and sulfate cathartic solutions designed for cleansing the colon: pathophysiological studies in five normal subjects","volume":"104","author":"Patel","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1177\/1091581809335124","article-title":"Safety of oral sulfates in rats and dogs contrasted with phosphate-induced nephropathy in rats","volume":"28","author":"Pelham","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Toxicol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2007.03459.x","article-title":"Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy","volume":"26","author":"DiPalma","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(90)71025-5","article-title":"Comparison of a new sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution versus a standard solution for colonoscopy cleansing","volume":"36","author":"DiPalma","year":"1990","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2187","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2003.07690.x","article-title":"Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing","volume":"98","author":"DiPalma","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1631","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2036.2006.03167.x","article-title":"Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy","volume":"24","author":"Bitoun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Aliment Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x","article-title":"Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy","volume":"103","author":"Ell","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6161","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v12.i38.6161","article-title":"The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study","volume":"12","author":"Parra-Blanco","year":"2006","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2005.09.030","article-title":"A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol\u2013based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy","volume":"64","author":"Rostom","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(05)00371-8","article-title":"A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation","volume":"62","author":"Aoun","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-966434","article-title":"Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy","volume":"39","author":"Park","year":"2007","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02258217","article-title":"Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy\u2014timing is the key!","volume":"41","author":"Church","year":"1998","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1067\/mge.2003.318","article-title":"A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol\u2013electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation","volume":"58","author":"El Sayed","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02055690","article-title":"Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy","volume":"40","author":"Frommer","year":"1997","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2008.01.044","article-title":"A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation","volume":"68","author":"Abdul-Baki","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2719","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2006.00868.x","article-title":"The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms\u2014a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial","volume":"101","author":"Chiu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-966375","article-title":"Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy","volume":"39","author":"Gupta","year":"2007","journal-title":"Endoscopy"}],"container-title":["Gastrointestinal Endoscopy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0016510710013210?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0016510710013210?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T16:14:10Z","timestamp":1758039250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0016510710013210"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0016510710013210"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054","relation":{},"ISSN":["0016-5107"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0016-5107","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gie.2010.03.1054","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}