{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,6]],"date-time":"2023-09-06T01:32:57Z","timestamp":1693963977223},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,3]],"date-time":"2017-02-03T20:27:12Z","timestamp":1486153632000},"page":"9-14","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Accident funiculaire apr\u00e8s version par man\u0153uvre externe\u00a0: mythe ou r\u00e9alit\u00e9\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Boujenah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Fleury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"I.","family":"Pharisien","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Benbara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Tigaizin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Bricou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Carbillon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0010","first-page":"410","article-title":"The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994","volume":"77","author":"Albrechtsen","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0015","first-page":"5","article-title":"Accouchement en pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge","author":"Schaal","year":"2008","journal-title":"EMC Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0246-0335(08)49485-1","article-title":"Mode d\u2019accouchement en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme\u00a0: la tentative de voie basse est-elle une option raisonnable\u00a0?","volume":"3","author":"Goffinet","year":"2008","journal-title":"EMC Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13535","article-title":"The Term Breech Trial results are generalisable","volume":"123","author":"Thornton","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","article-title":"The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies","volume":"123","author":"Berhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x","article-title":"Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term","volume":"20","author":"Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01271.x","article-title":"The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805\u00a0consecutive attempts","volume":"114","author":"Collins","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1154","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000128112.33398.31","article-title":"Fetal femur fracture and external cephalic version","volume":"104","author":"Papp","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade","article-title":"External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis","volume":"112","author":"Grootscholten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0055","first-page":"897","article-title":"Funic presentation as a complication of external cephalic version. A case report","volume":"44","author":"Gimovsky","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1159\/000073370","article-title":"Double nuchal umbilical cord and breech presentation. The value of close follow-up","volume":"56","author":"Al-Kouatly","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2013.03.013","article-title":"Patients\u2019 and professionals\u2019 barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands","volume":"30","author":"Rosman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0070","first-page":"1","article-title":"Impact of a prenatally diagnosed nuchal cord on obstetrical outcome in an unselected population","volume":"28","author":"Kesrouani","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1767","article-title":"Ultrasound detection of nuchal cord prior to labor induction and the risk of Cesarean section","volume":"25","author":"Peregrine","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-3072-9","article-title":"Is nuchal cord justified as a cause of obstetrician anxiety?","volume":"289","author":"Narang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816fd75c","article-title":"Management of nuchal cord with multiple loops","volume":"112","author":"Wang","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1228","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91359-9","article-title":"Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications","volume":"173","author":"Larson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000165322.42051.0f","article-title":"Nuchal cords in term and postterm deliveries--do we need to know?","volume":"106","author":"Sch\u00e4ffer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2009.04.001","article-title":"Decision-making on breech delivery: information as a way to reconcile maternal autonomy and medical responsibility","volume":"37","author":"Azria","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0105","first-page":"306","article-title":"Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review","volume":"82","author":"Zhang","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-005-0110-2","article-title":"Nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome","volume":"274","author":"Sheiner","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0115","article-title":"Complications of external cephalic version: a retrospective analysis of 1121\u00a0patients at a tertiary hospital in Sydney","volume":"9","author":"Rodgers","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.012","article-title":"Nuchal cord in post-term pregnancy - relationship to suspected intrapartum fetal distress indicating operative intervention","volume":"36","author":"Ghosh","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0125","first-page":"1","article-title":"Nuchal cord: is it really the silent risk of pregnancy?","volume":"1","author":"Akkaya","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2700","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery","volume":"27","author":"Leung","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600853651","article-title":"Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital 1997-2004","volume":"85","author":"Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.06.001","article-title":"Umbilical cord prolapse: a case study over 23\u00a0years","volume":"41","author":"Gannard-Pechin","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3996-3","article-title":"Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan. Obstetric risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse: a nationwide population-based study in Japan","volume":"294","author":"Hasegawa","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82954-0","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of a disreputable presentation: the nonfrank breech","volume":"34","author":"Broche","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90071-P","article-title":"Predicting success of external cephalic version","volume":"169","author":"Newman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0160","first-page":"201","article-title":"Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study","volume":"45","author":"Wong","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.056","article-title":"Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study","volume":"190","author":"V\u00e9zina","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2011.02.001","article-title":"External cephalic version: 1\u00a0year study in a level 3\u00a0maternity","volume":"39","author":"Roux-Chevalier","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.07.002","article-title":"Predictors of success of external cephalic version: Bi-center study","volume":"45","author":"Dochez","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12162","article-title":"The impact of an ECV service is limited by antenatal breech detection: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"42","author":"Hemelaar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0521-4","article-title":"Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia","volume":"15","author":"Homer","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13234","article-title":"An observational study of the success and complications of 2546\u00a0external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives","volume":"123","author":"Beuckens","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2013.03.013","article-title":"Facilitators and barriers to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term among health care providers in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis","volume":"30","author":"Rosman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Midwifery"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718916300010?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718916300010?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,6]],"date-time":"2021-11-06T22:00:42Z","timestamp":1636236042000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718916300010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718916300010"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Accident funiculaire apr\u00e8s version par man\u0153uvre externe\u00a0: mythe ou r\u00e9alit\u00e9\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2016.12.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}