{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T05:26:33Z","timestamp":1757568393769},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488326400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,9]],"date-time":"2017-02-09T03:02:32Z","timestamp":1486609352000},"page":"137-145","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["C\u00e9sarienne \u00e0 dilatation compl\u00e8te\u00a0: quels sont les risques \u00e0 craindre pour la m\u00e8re et l\u2019enfant\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"N.","family":"Bruey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Beucher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Pestour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Creveuil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Dreyfus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.11.008","article-title":"Coordination nationale des enqu\u00eates nationales p\u00e9rinatales. La sant\u00e9 p\u00e9rinatale en France m\u00e9tropolitaine de 1995\u00a0\u00e0 2010. R\u00e9sultats des enqu\u00eates nationales p\u00e9rinatales","volume":"41","author":"Blondel","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0120","series-title":"Indications de la c\u00e9sarienne programm\u00e9e \u00e0 terme\u00a0:argumentaire [en ligne]","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9","year":"2012"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.022","article-title":"Ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0: aspects \u00e9pid\u00e9miologiques","volume":"41","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor","volume":"109","author":"Alexander","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal morbidity of ceasarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with ceasarean delivery in the first stage of labour","volume":"112","author":"Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.06.026","article-title":"Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor","volume":"95","author":"Cebekulu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.033","article-title":"First versus second stage C\/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"175","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(01)06341-3","article-title":"Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study","volume":"358","author":"Murphy","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.08.014","article-title":"A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery","volume":"124","author":"Berhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0160","first-page":"187","article-title":"Cesarean section in a wedged head","volume":"57","author":"Khosla","year":"2003","journal-title":"Indian J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141290","article-title":"Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: randomized comparative study of two methods","volume":"22","author":"Fasubaa","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0548-5","article-title":"Ceasarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus ceasarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity","volume":"278","author":"Selo-Ojeme","year":"2008","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.12.027","article-title":"Comparison of \u201cpush\u201d and \u201cpull\u201d methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery","volume":"118","author":"Veisi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2012.03.005","article-title":"Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery","volume":"118","author":"Bastani","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014","article-title":"Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section","volume":"121","author":"Levy","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/986506","article-title":"Comparison of nulliparas undergoing cesarean section in first and second stages of labour: a prospective study in a tertiary teaching hospital","author":"Sucak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1248936","article-title":"Outcome in second \u2013 versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in eastern India","volume":"27","author":"Seal","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S260","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(08)74763-X","article-title":"Complications n\u00e9onatales des extractions instrumentales","volume":"37","author":"Baud","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.04.003","article-title":"Echecs d\u2019extraction par ventouse obst\u00e9tricale\u00a0: facteurs de risque, cons\u00e9quences maternelles et f\u0153tales","volume":"42","author":"Le Brun","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S188","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(08)74757-4","article-title":"Indications et pr\u00e9requis \u00e0 la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019une extraction instrumentale\u00a0: quand, comment et o\u00f9\u00a0?","volume":"37","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050701412297","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section","volume":"20","author":"Bhide","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00344-5","article-title":"What to do after a failed attempt of vacuum delivery?","volume":"107","author":"Sadan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917300041?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917300041?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,6]],"date-time":"2021-11-06T22:01:01Z","timestamp":1636236061000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718917300041"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718917300041"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"C\u00e9sarienne \u00e0 dilatation compl\u00e8te\u00a0: quels sont les risques \u00e0 craindre pour la m\u00e8re et l\u2019enfant\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}