{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T01:15:41Z","timestamp":1789780541250,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488326400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,7]],"date-time":"2017-02-07T20:45:59Z","timestamp":1486500359000},"page":"146-151","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Peut-on encore diminuer le taux d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie\u00a0? \u00c9tat des lieux en r\u00e9gion PACA"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"E.","family":"Lesieur","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1542-504X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Blanc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Loundou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Dubuc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Bretelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0145","first-page":"656","article-title":"Classic pages in obstetrics and gynecology. A treatise of midwifery. In three parts by Sir Fielding Ould, Dublin, O.\u00a0Nelson & C.\u00a0Connor, 1742","volume":"124","author":"Longo","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0150","series-title":"D\u00e9chirures obst\u00e9tricales r\u00e9centes du p\u00e9rin\u00e9e et \u00e9pisiotomie [Internet]. EM-Consulte","author":"Masson","year":"1999"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199511000-00021","article-title":"Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part II","volume":"50","author":"Woolley","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03268.x","article-title":"Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology","volume":"119","author":"Kalis","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2006.01.034","article-title":"\u00c0 propos des recommandations sur l\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie \u00e9mises par le CNGOF en d\u00e9cembre 2005","volume":"34","author":"Maillet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0170","series-title":"Les Enqu\u00eates Nationales P\u00e9rinatales [Internet]. EPOP\u00e9","year":"2010"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.10.005","article-title":"[Episiotomy in France in 2010: variations according to obstetrical context and place of birth]","volume":"45","author":"Chuilon","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12894","article-title":"Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project","volume":"95","author":"Blondel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13439","article-title":"Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"122","author":"Sagi-Dain","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0190","series-title":"L\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Introduction. \/data\/revues\/03682315\/003500S1\/7\/[Internet]","author":"Jacquetin","year":"2008"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01960.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study","volume":"115","author":"Murphy","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2014.12.019","article-title":"[Influence of a major decrease in the use of episiotomy applied to a high risk perineal situation: occiput posterior presentation.]","volume":"44","author":"Toubin","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.02.029","article-title":"How singleton breech babies at term are born in France: a survey of data from the AUDIPOG network","volume":"188","author":"Lansac","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0210","series-title":"Voie d\u2019accouchement en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge\u00a0: la position du Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues et obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais (CNGOF) [Internet]. EM-Consulte","author":"Masson","year":"2001"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.08.006","article-title":"De l\u2019impact des RPC pour r\u00e9duire le taux d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie","volume":"41","author":"Reinbold","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2008.10.007","volume":"38","author":"Riethmuller","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2009.09.013","article-title":"\u00c9valuation d\u2019une politique restrictive d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie avant et apr\u00e8s les recommandations du Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","volume":"39","author":"Eckman","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2009.06.003","article-title":"[Maternal and neonatal consequences induced by the French recommendations for episiotomy practice. Monocentric study about 5409 vaginal deliveries]","volume":"37","author":"Koskas","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2012.07.002","article-title":"Politique restrictive d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie au sein d\u2019un service\u00a0: un exemple d\u2019\u00e9valuation des pratiques professionnelles","volume":"41","author":"Azuar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.11.007","article-title":"Selective vs. routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparous women","volume":"198","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0245","series-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]","article-title":"Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma","author":"Aasheim","year":"2011"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)80021-4","article-title":"Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment","volume":"175","author":"Bansal","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.06.002","article-title":"[Impact of a major decrease in the use of episiotomy on perineal tears in a level III maternity ward]","volume":"43","author":"Chehab","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e107053","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0107053","article-title":"The association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a population based matched cohort study","volume":"9","author":"R\u00e4is\u00e4nen","year":"2014","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1459","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-2956-1","article-title":"Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Verghese","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.3109\/17538157.2010.492923","article-title":"Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project","volume":"35","author":"Gissler","year":"2010","journal-title":"Inform Health Soc Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619409027599","article-title":"Episiotomy, elective or selective: a report of a random allocation trial","volume":"14","author":"Eltorkey Maan","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6435","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1971","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.288.6435.1971","article-title":"Is routine episiotomy necessary?","volume":"288","author":"Harrison","year":"1984","journal-title":"Br Med J Clin Res Ed"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917300077?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917300077?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,4]],"date-time":"2018-09-04T09:21:09Z","timestamp":1536052869000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718917300077"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718917300077"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Peut-on encore diminuer le taux d\u2019\u00e9pisiotomie\u00a0? \u00c9tat des lieux en r\u00e9gion PACA","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.01.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}