{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,2]],"date-time":"2022-04-02T19:31:16Z","timestamp":1648927876944},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,1]],"date-time":"2017-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496275200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,25]],"date-time":"2017-05-25T16:32:00Z","timestamp":1495729920000},"page":"335-339","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["L\u2019utilisation des courbes de poids personnalis\u00e9es en ant\u00e9natal am\u00e9liore-t-elle le diagnostic des f\u0153tus petits pour l\u2019\u00e2ge gestationnel \u00e0 haut risque de morbidit\u00e9 n\u00e9onatale\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Lerebours","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Callec","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Lauria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Morel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin No.\u00a0134: fetal growth restriction","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.012","article-title":"[Definitions: small for gestational age and intrauterine growth retardation]","volume":"42","author":"Ego","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction","volume":"18","author":"Kady","year":"2004","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2008.04.010","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"Miller","year":"2008","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.020","article-title":"[Short-term outcome and small for gestational age newborn management]","volume":"42","author":"Flamant","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00008","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"Pallotto","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0210","first-page":"A4826","article-title":"Prognosis and risk factors for intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"61","author":"Sehested","year":"2014","journal-title":"Dan Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0215","first-page":"16","article-title":"Mortality and morbidity pattern in small-for-gestational age and appropriate-for-gestational age very preterm babies: a hospital based study","volume":"21","author":"Muhammad","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1090","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2006.09.019","article-title":"[Report of the French Comit\u00e9 national technique de l\u2019\u00e9chographie de d\u00e9pistage pr\u00e9natal (prenatal ultrasound): what are the practical consequences?]","volume":"34","author":"Dommergues","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0225","first-page":"1030","article-title":"Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best?","volume":"80","author":"Chang","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(86)90165-6","article-title":"Controlled trial of ultrasound screening for light for gestational age (LGA) infants in late pregnancy","volume":"23","author":"Secher","year":"1986","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91342-6","article-title":"Customised antenatal growth charts","volume":"339","author":"Gardosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.06030168.x","article-title":"An adjustable fetal weight standard","volume":"6","author":"Gardosi","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0250","article-title":"Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women","volume":"CD008549","author":"Carberry","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500160444","article-title":"Customised fetal growth chart: a systematic review","volume":"25","author":"Gelbaya","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","article-title":"Birth weight in live births and stillbirths","volume":"48","author":"Poon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0265","unstructured":"Emmeline L, et al. Courbes personnalis\u00e9es versus courbes standardis\u00e9es pour l\u2019\u00e9valuation de la croissance p\u00e9rinatale. 2016 [Internet. Cit\u00e9 11\u00a0ao\u00fbt 2016. Disponible sur\u00a0: http:\/\/docnum.univ-lorraine.fr\/public\/BUMED_T_2015_LAURIA_EMMELINE.pdf]."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.138.5.871","article-title":"Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement","volume":"138","author":"Hadlock","year":"1982","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.01.006","article-title":"[Chart for estimation of fetal weight 2014 by the French College of Fetal Sonography (CFEF)]","volume":"45","author":"Massoud","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.816","article-title":"Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study","volume":"194","author":"Ego","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0295","first-page":"552","article-title":"[Development of the main indicators of perinatal health in metropolitan France between 1995 and 1998. Results of the national perinatal survey]","volume":"30","author":"Blondel","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2001.00205.x","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards","volume":"108","author":"Clausson","year":"2001","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13616.x","article-title":"The individualised birthweight ratio: a new method of identifying intrauterine growth retardation","volume":"101","author":"Sanderson","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10154.x","article-title":"Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high-risk population","volume":"105","author":"de Jong","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00285-2","article-title":"Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards","volume":"88","author":"Mongelli","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.014","article-title":"Customized estimated fetal weight: a novel antenatal tool to diagnose abnormal fetal growth","volume":"207","author":"Kase","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14755","article-title":"Impact on obstetric outcome of third-trimester screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"46","author":"Callec","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600720071","article-title":"An investigation into the applicability of customised charts for the assessment of fetal growth in antenatal population at Blackburn, Lancashire, UK","volume":"26","author":"Dua","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2000.00001.x","article-title":"Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction","volume":"15","author":"De Jong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02371.x","article-title":"Prediction of intrauterine growth restriction with customised estimated fetal weight centiles","volume":"110","author":"Owen","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14826","article-title":"Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 19\u201324 weeks","volume":"46","author":"Lesmes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third-trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917301125?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718917301125?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,6]],"date-time":"2021-11-06T22:01:55Z","timestamp":1636236115000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718917301125"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718917301125"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"L\u2019utilisation des courbes de poids personnalis\u00e9es en ant\u00e9natal am\u00e9liore-t-elle le diagnostic des f\u0153tus petits pour l\u2019\u00e2ge gestationnel \u00e0 haut risque de morbidit\u00e9 n\u00e9onatale\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2017.05.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}