{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T18:41:09Z","timestamp":1747161669348,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,1]],"date-time":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1535760000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,29]],"date-time":"2018-08-29T12:29:33Z","timestamp":1535545773000},"page":"632-638","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparaison du pronostic obst\u00e9trical des tentatives d\u2019accouchement par le si\u00e8ge\u00a0: travail spontan\u00e9 versus d\u00e9clenchement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"A.","family":"Breton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Gueudry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Branger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.-A.","family":"Le Baccon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Thubert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Arthuis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Winer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8077-0288","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"V.","family":"Dochez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0145","first-page":"261","article-title":"La pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge \u00e0 terme\u00a0: \u00e9volution des pratiques en France et analyse des r\u00e9sultats n\u00e9onatals en fonction des pratiques obst\u00e9tricales, \u00e0 partir du R\u00e9seau Sentinelle AUDIPOG","volume":"31","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0150","first-page":"605","article-title":"Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature","volume":"82","author":"Cheng","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-3016.1999.00202.x","article-title":"Breech delivery at term in Denmark, 1982\u20131992: a population-based case\u00a0\u2014\u00a0control study","volume":"13","author":"Krebs","year":"1999","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10976.x","article-title":"Perinatal mortality and route of delivery in term breech presentations","volume":"104","author":"Lindqvist","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10200.x","article-title":"Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705\u00a0singleton term breech presentations","volume":"105","author":"Irion","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00605-4","article-title":"Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993\u00a0through 1999","volume":"102","author":"Kayem","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2007.07.003","article-title":"Accouchement du si\u00e8ge par voie vaginale\u00a0: \u00e9volution de l\u2019acceptabilit\u00e9 par les obst\u00e9triciens et les patientes","volume":"35","author":"Lagrange","year":"2007","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x","article-title":"The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453\u00a0term breech infants","volume":"112","author":"Rietberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.04.005","article-title":"Induced labour at term and breech presentation: experience of a level IIB French maternity","volume":"46","author":"Jarniat","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.03.008","article-title":"Induction du travail et pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge\u00a0: exp\u00e9rience de la maternit\u00e9 de l\u2019h\u00f4pital Robert-Debr\u00e9, Paris","volume":"40","author":"Marzouk","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3853-4","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study","volume":"293","author":"Macharey","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2015-0426","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"45","author":"Burgos","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.12.001","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of induction of labor for term breech presentations","volume":"46","author":"Bleu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.07.002","article-title":"SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no.\u00a0226, June 2009","volume":"107","author":"Kotaska","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"ACOG Cmmittee Opinion No.\u00a0340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"108","author":"ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"year":"2006","series-title":"RCOG green top guidelines: the management of breech presentation. Guideline no.\u00a020b","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0230"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0235","series-title":"L\u2019accouchement par voie basse est-il encore une option raisonnable en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge\u00a0? CNGOF Vingt-Neuvi\u00e8me Journ\u00e9es National","first-page":"49","author":"Goffinet","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0240","series-title":"Travail original enqu\u00eate sur les pratiques obst\u00e9tricales en France","first-page":"577","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2009.04.007","article-title":"\u00c9valuation des protocoles de d\u00e9cision de voie d\u2019accouchement en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge dans 19\u00a0CHU en France","volume":"38","author":"Michel","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0250","first-page":"319","article-title":"Enqu\u00eate de pratique nationale aupr\u00e8s des obst\u00e9triciens sur le d\u00e9clenchement artificiel du travail","volume":"28","author":"Goffinet","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0255","first-page":"638","article-title":"Enqu\u00eate des pratiques de maturation du col et de d\u00e9clenchement du travail en France","volume":"32","author":"Goffinet","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.022","article-title":"Ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel\u00a0: aspects \u00e9pid\u00e9miologiques","volume":"41","author":"Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0265","first-page":"1","article-title":"Grossesse et ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel","volume":"11","author":"Madar","year":"2016","journal-title":"EMC\u00a0-\u00a0Obst\u00e9trique\/Gyn\u00e9cologie"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.12.031","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes between induction of labor and spontaneous labor for term breech\u2013A systemic review and meta analysis","volume":"222","author":"Sun","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82702-4","article-title":"Cons\u00e9quences de l\u2019ob\u00e9sit\u00e9 maternelle sur le d\u00e9roulement du travail et de l\u2019accouchement","volume":"34","author":"Hamon","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e151","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14465","article-title":"Management of Breech Presentation","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718918302071?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718918302071?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,21]],"date-time":"2018-09-21T15:43:53Z","timestamp":1537544633000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718918302071"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718918302071"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2468-7189"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparaison du pronostic obst\u00e9trical des tentatives d\u2019accouchement par le si\u00e8ge\u00a0: travail spontan\u00e9 versus d\u00e9clenchement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}