{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T02:10:42Z","timestamp":1767147042304,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,1]],"date-time":"2019-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1551398400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,1]],"date-time":"2019-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1551398400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,10]],"date-time":"2019-02-10T20:11:18Z","timestamp":1549829478000},"page":"273-280","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["D\u00e9clenchement par ballonnet en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel et col d\u00e9favorable\u00a0: la tentative en vaut-elle la chandelle\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"47","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8809-1733","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Boujenah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Fleury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Tigaizin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Benbara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Mounsambote","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Murtada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Fermaut","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Carbillon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"Committee on Practice Bulletins \u2013 ACOG Obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.109386","article-title":"Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks","volume":"184","author":"Macones","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115278","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean: to induce or not to induce","volume":"184","author":"Sims","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-828608","article-title":"Uterine rupture in patients with a prior cesarean delivery: the impact of cervical ripening","volume":"21","author":"Hoffman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1358","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x","article-title":"Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study","volume":"117","author":"Dekker","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0265","first-page":"39","article-title":"Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Delaney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000922","article-title":"Outcomes of term induction in trial of labor after cesarean delivery: analysis of a modern obstetric cohort","volume":"126","author":"Lappen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.039","article-title":"Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?","volume":"200","author":"Grobman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.025","article-title":"Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Rossi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop Score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00259-7","article-title":"Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix","volume":"90","author":"Xenakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.030","article-title":"Mode de d\u00e9clenchement du travail et conduite du travail en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel","volume":"41","author":"Deruelle","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x","article-title":"Induction of labour after 1\u00a0previous caesarean section","volume":"39","author":"McNally","year":"1999","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x","article-title":"Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section","volume":"112","author":"Kayani","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00300.x","article-title":"Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry?","volume":"112","author":"Buhimschi","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0320","first-page":"10","article-title":"Balloon dilators for labor induction: a historical review","volume":"6","author":"Smith","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Med Ethics Hist Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"183","author":"Ravasia","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol nov"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505","article-title":"Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"204","author":"Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2\u00a0gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014","article-title":"Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review","volume":"218","author":"Gommers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0345","first-page":"CD009792","article-title":"Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section","volume":"6","author":"West","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86S","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000447415.86317.00","article-title":"Intracervical ripening bulb for induction of labor in a trial of labor after cesarean delivery","volume":"123","author":"Zaki","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2017.50","article-title":"Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"37","author":"Kruit","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","article-title":"Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12566","article-title":"Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"142","author":"Vital","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.028","article-title":"Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery","volume":"41","author":"Beucher","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","article-title":"Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section","volume":"335","author":"McMahon","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.075","article-title":"Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0385","first-page":"S338","article-title":"Gestational diabetes","volume":"2010 supplement","author":"Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues et obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lpm.2016.05.012","article-title":"Hypertension and pregnancy. Expert consensus statement from the French Society of Hypertension, an affiliate of the French Society of Cardiology","volume":"45","author":"Mounier-Vehier","year":"2016","journal-title":"Presse Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and5\u00a0intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.01.026","article-title":"Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"169","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.07.003","article-title":"CNGOF classification of fetal heart rate: color code for obstetricians and midwives","volume":"42","author":"Carbonne","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0415","article-title":"Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth","volume":"26","author":"Dodd","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000179389.82986.50","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"106","author":"Coassolo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","article-title":"The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Landon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.801114.x","article-title":"Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device","volume":"80","author":"Khotaba","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0435","article-title":"Membrane sweeping for induction of labour","volume":"1","author":"Boulvain","year":"2005","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4643-y","article-title":"Membrane sweeping added to formal induction method to increase the spontaneous vaginal delivery: a meta-analysis","volume":"297","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b8fa00","article-title":"Serial membrane sweeping at term in planned vaginal birth after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"114","author":"Hamdan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13353","article-title":"Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"97","author":"Schoen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E556","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.170371","article-title":"Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity","volume":"190","author":"Young","year":"2018","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e60404","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0060404","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database","volume":"8","author":"Stock","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.07.001","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,1]],"date-time":"2019-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561939200000}}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718919300145?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718919300145?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:37:04Z","timestamp":1762853824000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718919300145"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718919300145"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"D\u00e9clenchement par ballonnet en cas d\u2019ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel et col d\u00e9favorable\u00a0: la tentative en vaut-elle la chandelle\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.01.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}