{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T00:52:36Z","timestamp":1782867156595,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":91,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,3]],"date-time":"2019-11-03T11:28:13Z","timestamp":1572780493000},"page":"81-94","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Version par man\u0153uvre externe et techniques de version alternatives"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"G.","family":"Ducarme","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0460","series-title":"Enqu\u00eate Nationale P\u00e9rinatale 2016\u00a0: les naissances en 2016\u00a0et leur \u00e9volution depuis 2010","author":"Blondel","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0470","article-title":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF\u2013\u00c9pid\u00e9miologie, facteurs de risque et complications","volume":"48","author":"Mattuizzi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0475","first-page":"e178","article-title":"External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation","volume":"124","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG)","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e60","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002755","article-title":"Committee Opinion No.\u00a0745: mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"132","author":"ACOG","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0485","series-title":"Management of breech presentation at term","author":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG)","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34221-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery of breech presentation","volume":"31","author":"Kotaska","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0495","article-title":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF\u2013M\u00e9thode et organisation","volume":"48","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0500","first-page":"CD000083","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation at term","volume":"4","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04825.x","article-title":"A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy","volume":"91","author":"Brocks","year":"1984","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0510","first-page":"386","article-title":"The role of external cephalic version on the presentation at delivery","volume":"25","author":"Dafallah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0515","first-page":"633","article-title":"Value and pregnancy outcome of external cephalic version","volume":"11","author":"Hindawi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eastern Mediterranean Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08934.x","article-title":"Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate: a controlled trial","volume":"90","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"1983","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10303.x","article-title":"External cephalic version at term. A randomized controlled trial using tocolysis","volume":"98","author":"Mahomed","year":"1991","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0530","first-page":"25","article-title":"A randomized trial of external cephalic version in late pregnancy","volume":"14","author":"Mehbooba","year":"2012","journal-title":"JK Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0535","first-page":"2245","article-title":"Value of external version in breech presentation at term","volume":"134","author":"Van de Pavert","year":"1990","journal-title":"Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0540","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90604-9","article-title":"Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy","volume":"141","author":"Van Dorsten","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0545","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-0941-9","article-title":"Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States","volume":"16","author":"Weiniger","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0550","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15475","article-title":"External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18\u00a0years\u2019 experience","volume":"126","author":"Melo","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0555","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x","article-title":"Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term","volume":"20","author":"Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0560","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00178-1","article-title":"External cephalic version at term with tocolysis and vibroacoustic stimulation","volume":"59","author":"Annapoorna","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0565","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(93)90233-3","article-title":"The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice","volume":"52","author":"Bewley","year":"1993","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0570","first-page":"63","article-title":"Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis","volume":"67","author":"Dyson","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0575","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14169","article-title":"Complications of external cephalic version: a retrospective analysis of 1121\u00a0patients at a tertiary hospital in Sydney","volume":"124","author":"Rodgers","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0580","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00347.x","article-title":"External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks","volume":"83","author":"Collaris","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0585","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade","article-title":"External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis","volume":"112","author":"Grootscholten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0590","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13234","article-title":"An observational study of the success and complications of 2546\u00a0external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives","volume":"123","author":"Beuckens","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0595","first-page":"279","article-title":"External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery","volume":"22","author":"Mashiach","year":"1995","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12070.x","article-title":"Introducing external cephalic version at 36\u00a0weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit","volume":"104","author":"Healey","year":"1997","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02837.x","article-title":"The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2\u00a0Trial: an international multicentre randomized controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies","volume":"118","author":"Hutton","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002699","article-title":"Association between attempted external cephalic version and perinatal morbidity and mortality","volume":"132","author":"Son","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0615","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1547-6","article-title":"Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?","volume":"17","author":"Kuppens","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.442","article-title":"External cephalic version beginning at 34\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation versus 37\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation: a randomized multicenter trial","volume":"189","author":"Hutton","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00518.x","article-title":"Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version after a failed version for breech presentation at term: a randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial","volume":"112","author":"Impey","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0630","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1395846","article-title":"The outcomes and risk factors of fetal bradycardia associated with external cephalic version","volume":"32","author":"Suyama","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0635","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318179978c","article-title":"Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version","volume":"112","author":"Boucher","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1\u00a0Suppl.","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0640","first-page":"1S123","article-title":"Pr\u00e9vention de l\u2019allo-immunisation Rh\u00e9sus-D f\u0153to-maternelle. Aspects pratiques","volume":"35","author":"Cortey","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0645","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32709-8","article-title":"Factors associated with a successful external cephalic version in the early ECV trial","volume":"30","author":"Hutton","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0650","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13161","article-title":"Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253\u00a0women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses","volume":"96","author":"Hutton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0655","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2159","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1427721","article-title":"The impact of maternal body mass index on external cephalic version success","volume":"32","author":"Chaudhary","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0660","first-page":"323","article-title":"Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version","volume":"38","author":"Teoh","year":"1997","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0665","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.10.007","article-title":"Prediction models for successful external cephalic version: a systematic review","volume":"195","author":"Velzel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0670","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1262909","article-title":"Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36\u00a0weeks","volume":"28","author":"Kok","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0675","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1285098","article-title":"External validation of a prediction model for successful external cephalic version","volume":"29","author":"De Hundt","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0680","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.019","article-title":"Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for external cephalic version","volume":"228","author":"Velzel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0685","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"i6773","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i6773","article-title":"Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"356","author":"Velzel","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0690","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.09.029","article-title":"Situations cliniques particuli\u00e8res, maternelles ou f\u0153tales, influen\u00e7ant le choix du mode d\u2019accouchement en cas d\u2019ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent de c\u00e9sarienne","volume":"41","author":"Schmitz","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0695","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.008","article-title":"Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Kok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0700","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12527","article-title":"The efficacy and safety of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery","volume":"57","author":"Weill","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0705","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12487","article-title":"Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study","volume":"121","author":"Burgos","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0710","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.10.036","article-title":"External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a cohort study of 100\u00a0consecutive attempts","volume":"231","author":"Impey","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0715","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6277","article-title":"Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis","volume":"33","author":"Kok","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0720","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90071-P","article-title":"Predicting success of external cephalic version","volume":"169","author":"Newman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0725","first-page":"CD000084","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation before term","volume":"7","author":"Hutton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0730","first-page":"CD000184","article-title":"Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version","volume":"2","author":"Cluver","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0735","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609065734","article-title":"A randomized, double blind, controlled trial of tocolysis to assist external cephalic version in late pregnancy","volume":"75","author":"Chung","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0740","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00440-7","article-title":"A randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of terbutaline for external cephalic version","volume":"90","author":"Fernandez","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0745","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)80013-5","article-title":"Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?","volume":"175","author":"Marquette","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0750","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.09.014","article-title":"Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version","volume":"88","author":"Nor Azlin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0755","first-page":"896","article-title":"External cephalic version at term: is a tocolytic necessary?","volume":"70","author":"Robertson","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0760","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02082.x","article-title":"Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of ritodrine and hexoprenaline for tocolysis prior to external cephalic version at term","volume":"3","author":"Stock","year":"1993","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0765","first-page":"155","article-title":"A prospective randomised controlled trial of external cephalic version comparing two methods of uterine tocolysis with a nontocolysis group","volume":"30","author":"Tan","year":"1989","journal-title":"Singapore Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0770","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.08.014","article-title":"Intravenous salbutamol for external cephalic version","volume":"104","author":"Vani","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0775","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817f1f2e","article-title":"Nifedipine as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"112","author":"Kok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0780","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01991.x","article-title":"Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomized trial","volume":"116","author":"Collaris","year":"2009","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0785","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.04.010","article-title":"Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version","volume":"102","author":"Mohamed Ismail","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0790","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02824.x","article-title":"Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Wilcox","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0795","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13280.x","article-title":"Double-blind randomised controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate spray for external cephalic version","volume":"107","author":"Yanny","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0800","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30107-4","article-title":"Sublingual nitroglycerine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version: a comparative study","volume":"25","author":"Bujold","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0805","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b05a19","article-title":"Intravenous nitroglycerin for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"114","author":"Hilton","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182324583","article-title":"Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"118","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0815","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.036","article-title":"Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"215","author":"Magro-Malosso","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0820","first-page":"S13","article-title":"Antepartum external cephalic version under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study","volume":"25","author":"Delisle","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0825","first-page":"345","article-title":"The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial","volume":"93","author":"Dugoff","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl.\u00a01","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0830","first-page":"S140","article-title":"The effect of intrathecal anesthesia on the success of external cephalic version (ECV)","volume":"189","author":"Hollard","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0835","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aev107","article-title":"Randomized trial of anaesthetic interventions in external cephalic version for breech presentation","volume":"114","author":"Khaw","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0840","first-page":"648","article-title":"Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial","volume":"95","author":"Mancuso","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0845","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70029-2","article-title":"A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success","volume":"177","author":"Schorr","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0850","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2009.02.006","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation","volume":"18","author":"Sullivan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0855","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000295605.38175.7b","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Weiniger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0860","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeq053","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of external cephalic version in term multiparae with or without spinal analgesia","volume":"104","author":"Weiniger","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0865","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1089\/acm.2012.0945","article-title":"Hypnosis for the control of pain associated with external cephalic version: a comparative study","volume":"19","author":"Guittier","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Altern Complement Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0870","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0046","article-title":"Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: prospective comparative study","volume":"41","author":"Burgos","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0875","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500408440","article-title":"Variation of force applied during external cephalic version with different patients\u2019 characteristic and outcome of version","volume":"85","author":"Leung","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0880","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13238.x","article-title":"External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics","volume":"107","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0885","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1589","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-200206000-00041","article-title":"Central neuraxial blockade promotes external cephalic version success after a failed attempt","volume":"94","author":"Cherayil","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0890","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12312","article-title":"Clinical outcomes after external cephalic version with spinal anesthesia after failure of a first attempt without anesthesia","volume":"139","author":"Massalha","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0895","first-page":"CD003928","article-title":"Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation","volume":"5","author":"Coyle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0900","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000303","article-title":"Version of breech fetuses by moxibustion with acupuncture: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"124","author":"Coulon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0905","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.492","article-title":"Acupuncture version of breech presentation: a randomized sham-controlled single-blinded trial","volume":"204","author":"Sananes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024_bib0910","first-page":"CD000051","article-title":"Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation","volume":"10","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718919303381?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718919303381?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:38:32Z","timestamp":1762853912000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718919303381"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"references-count":91,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718919303381"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Version par man\u0153uvre externe et techniques de version alternatives","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2019.10.024","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}