{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:43:25Z","timestamp":1762854205551,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,1]],"date-time":"2020-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1601510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,2]],"date-time":"2021-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633132800000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":366,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,23]],"date-time":"2020-04-23T11:39:04Z","timestamp":1587641944000},"page":"722-728","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparaison de la prise en charge per-partum des pr\u00e9sentations podaliques par rapport aux pr\u00e9sentations c\u00e9phaliques"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Benzekri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Ghesqui\u00e8re","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Drumez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"V.","family":"Houfflin-Debarge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Subtil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Garabedian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"9239","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"issue":"4\u00a0Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0295","first-page":"605","article-title":"Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature","volume":"82","author":"Cheng","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.04.003","article-title":"Is trial of labor harmful in breech delivery? A cohort comparison for breech and vertex presentations","volume":"46","author":"Adjaoud","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01488.x","article-title":"Selective vaginal breech delivery at term\u00a0\u2013\u00a0still an option","volume":"91","author":"Toivonen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0310","first-page":"11","article-title":"[Per-partum risk factors of neonatal acidemia in planned vaginal delivery for fetuses in breech presentation]","volume":"47","author":"Vannerum","year":"2019","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.01.001","article-title":"Term breech presentations in singleton pregnancies: a continuous series of 418\u00a0cases","volume":"42","author":"Gannard-Pechin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"710","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10200.x","article-title":"Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705\u00a0singleton term breech presentations","volume":"105","author":"Irion","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1694","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127902","article-title":"Mode of delivery and outcome of 699\u00a0term singleton breech deliveries at a single center","volume":"187","author":"Giuliani","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00605-4","article-title":"Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993\u00a0through 1999","volume":"102","author":"Kayem","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00845.x","article-title":"Assisted vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in breech presentation","volume":"84","author":"Krupitz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90923-7","article-title":"Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report","volume":"146","author":"Gimovsky","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82954-0","article-title":"Pronostic obst\u00e9trical et n\u00e9onatal d\u2019une pr\u00e9sentation podalique de mauvaise r\u00e9putation: le si\u00e8ge complet","volume":"34","author":"Broche","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"7044","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1451","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.312.7044.1451","article-title":"Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up","volume":"312","author":"Danielian","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.06.032","article-title":"The term breech presentation: neonatal results and obstetric practices in France","volume":"125","author":"Vendittelli","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0365","series-title":"Pratique de l\u2019accouchement","first-page":"134","article-title":"Pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge","author":"Deruelle","year":"2011"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.05.003","article-title":"Evaluation of a decision protocol for type of delivery of infants in breech presentation at term","volume":"158","author":"Michel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography","volume":"131","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0380","first-page":"595","article-title":"Fetal heart rhythm variations and state of the infant at birth","volume":"1","author":"Melchior","year":"1972","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"year":"2017","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9","series-title":"Accouchement normal\u00a0: accompagnement de la physiologie et interventions m\u00e9dicales. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0385"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.021","article-title":"Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"196","author":"Cheng","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34221-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery of breech presentation","volume":"31","author":"Kotaska","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","article-title":"The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies","volume":"123","author":"Berhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-1115-5","article-title":"Cardiotocography in breech versus vertex delivery: an examiner-blinded, cross-sectional nested case-control study","author":"Toivonen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c","article-title":"Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option","volume":"103","author":"Alarab","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1172064","article-title":"Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3\u00a0during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis","volume":"30","author":"Silberstein","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0425","first-page":"45","article-title":"Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. VIII. Breech presentations","volume":"29","author":"White","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0430","first-page":"233","article-title":"Fetal acidosis and the abnormal fetal heart rate tracing: the term breech fetus","volume":"63","author":"Eilen","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90394-5","article-title":"The development of fetal acidosis in the presence of an abnormal fetal heart rate tracing. I. The average for gestational age fetus","volume":"144","author":"Fleischer","year":"1982","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90041-7","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. V. Fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor","volume":"140","author":"Krebs","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2007.11.015","article-title":"Fetal monitoring during the active second stage of labor","volume":"37","author":"Dupuis","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sagf.2015.10.004","article-title":"L\u2019analyse du rythme cardiaque f\u0153tal au cours de l\u2019expulsion des pr\u00e9sentations podaliques. Analyse comparative dans une maternit\u00e9 de niveau III","volume":"14","author":"Bourtembourg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Rev Sage-Femme"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0455","first-page":"633","article-title":"The changes in acid base balance of the fetus at term in the second stage of labour typed according to the CTG patterns (author's transl)","volume":"9","author":"Meyer","year":"1980","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0460","first-page":"381","article-title":"Perinatal factors associated with pH<7.1\u00a0in umbilical artery and Apgar 5min <7.0\u00a0in term newborn","volume":"34","author":"De Zorzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstet Rev Fed Bras Soc Ginecol E Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0465","first-page":"161","article-title":"Prenatal risk factors for neonatal asphyxia: how risk for each?","volume":"11","author":"Chen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi Chin J Contemp Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.09.035","article-title":"Cesarean vs. vaginal birth for term breech presentation in 2\u00a0different study periods","volume":"96","author":"Daskalakis","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01143.x","article-title":"Consequences of the term breech trial in Denmark: outcome of term breech and cesarean rates","volume":"90","author":"Hartnack Tharin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12449","article-title":"Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Vlemmix","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.x","article-title":"Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995\u00a0to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33,824\u00a0infants","volume":"110","author":"Rietberg CCTh","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00333-5","article-title":"Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116\u00a0cases","volume":"98","author":"Golfier","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-012-0289-7","article-title":"Delivery in breech presentation: the decision making","volume":"62","author":"Singh","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610410001660733","article-title":"Correlation of fetal outcome with mode of delivery for breech presentation","volume":"24","author":"Bassaw","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0505","first-page":"911","article-title":"Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study","volume":"102","author":"Gilbert","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00386.x","article-title":"Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high?","volume":"83","author":"Ulander","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0515","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12208","article-title":"Lessons to be learnt in managing the breech presentation at term: an 11-year single-centre retrospective study","volume":"54","author":"Borbolla Foster","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00248.x","article-title":"Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term","volume":"84","author":"Uotila","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2001.080008731.x","article-title":"Mode of delivery in breech presentation at term: Increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery","volume":"80","author":"Herbst","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00323.x","article-title":"Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital","volume":"112","author":"Pradhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-153","article-title":"Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study","volume":"13","author":"Vistad","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0540","first-page":"945","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among term breech births: swedish experience 1987\u20131993","volume":"92","author":"Roman","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0545","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.2298\/VSP1010807B","article-title":"Vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for term breech delivery","volume":"67","author":"Babovic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Vojnosanit Pregl"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0550","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.11.035","article-title":"Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth","volume":"196","author":"Bakker","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0555","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13008.x","article-title":"Relation between frequency of uterine contractions and human fetal cerebral oxygen saturation studied during labour by near infrared spectroscopy","volume":"101","author":"Peebles","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0560","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"856e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.066","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver agreement among obstetric experts in court regarding the review of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and obstetrical management","volume":"213","author":"Sabiani","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0565","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.027","article-title":"Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability","volume":"199","author":"Chauhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5\u00a0Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010_bib0285","first-page":"747","article-title":"Clinical significance of fetal heart rate tracings during the second stage of labor","volume":"97","author":"Sheiner","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718920301653?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718920301653?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:39:39Z","timestamp":1762853979000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718920301653"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718920301653"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2468-7189"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparaison de la prise en charge per-partum des pr\u00e9sentations podaliques par rapport aux pr\u00e9sentations c\u00e9phaliques","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2020.04.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}