{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:47:55Z","timestamp":1762854475753,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":74,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,1]],"date-time":"2024-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1714521600000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":366,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,24]],"date-time":"2022-10-24T10:23:31Z","timestamp":1666607011000},"page":"256-269","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Revue de la litt\u00e9rature des courbes intra-ut\u00e9rines et de poids de naissance"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"51","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2755-7322","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"I.","family":"Monier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7905-7098","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"A.","family":"Hocquette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9568-2969","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Zeitlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction","volume":"121","author":"American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"year":"2013","series-title":"The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green-top guideline no. 31","author":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0380"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0385","unstructured":"Fetal growth restriction - Recognition, diagnosis & management. Clinical practice guideline. Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland and Directorate of Clinical Strategy and Programmes, Health Service Executive. Guideline No: 28. Version 1.1. March 2014. Available at: http:\/\/www.rcpi.ie\/content\/docs\/000001\/3229_5_media.pdf [last accessed July 2016]."},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0390","article-title":"Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy","volume":"218","author":"McCowan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians","volume":"193","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.060","article-title":"Standard vs population reference curves in obstetrics: which one should we use?","volume":"220","author":"Ananth","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11112","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review","volume":"40","author":"Arcangeli","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9774","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62233-7","article-title":"Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"377","author":"Flenady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13435","article-title":"Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review","volume":"122","author":"Murray","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13702","article-title":"Early-onset fetal growth restriction: A systematic review on mortality and morbidity","volume":"99","author":"Pels","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.003","volume":"38","author":"Araujo Junior","year":"2017","journal-title":"Macrosomia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0440","article-title":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012)","volume":"223","author":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13500","article-title":"Figo Safe Motherhood NHC. FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?","volume":"152","author":"Visser","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"Suppl. 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13522","article-title":"FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction","volume":"152","author":"Melamed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","article-title":"In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard","volume":"181","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x","article-title":"Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights","volume":"85","author":"Marsal","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19073","article-title":"Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts","volume":"52","author":"Nicolaides","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","article-title":"The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight","volume":"14","author":"Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17347","article-title":"International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"49","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4019","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range","volume":"29","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.01.006","article-title":"French College of Fetal S, Combourieu D. [Chart for estimation of fetal weight 2014\u00a0by the French College of Fetal Sonography (CFEF)]","volume":"45","author":"Massoud","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2006.09.001","article-title":"[Birth weight and size: charts and equations]","volume":"36","author":"Salomon","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.009","article-title":"[Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I - Methodology]","volume":"45","author":"Ego","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.008","article-title":"[Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. II - Comparison with existing curves and benefits of customization]","volume":"45","author":"Ego","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"9780","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1855","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60364-4","article-title":"A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles","volume":"377","author":"Mikolajczyk","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"213","author":"Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0515","article-title":"The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"120","author":"Villar","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9946","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)60932-6","article-title":"International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Villar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22000","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21(st) standards for Hadlock's estimation of fetal weight","volume":"56","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.012","article-title":"Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France","volume":"219","author":"Monier","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.006","article-title":"Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"210","author":"Sjaarda","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0540","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e003942","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003942","article-title":"Association between reduced stillbirth rates in England and regional uptake of accreditation training in customised fetal growth assessment","volume":"3","author":"Gardosi","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0545","article-title":"The INTERGROWTH-21(st) fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care","volume":"218","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0550","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.32.5.793","article-title":"Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24\u00a0to 42\u00a0weeks of gestation","volume":"32","author":"Lubchenco","year":"1963","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0555","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e214","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2009-0913","article-title":"New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data","volume":"125","author":"Olsen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0560","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2431-13-59","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants","volume":"13","author":"Fenton","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pediatr"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0565","first-page":"61","article-title":"[Fetal growth from the AUDIPOG study. I. Establishment of reference curves]","volume":"25","author":"Mamelle","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"10021","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0570","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00384-6","article-title":"INTERGROWTH-21st very preterm size at birth reference charts","volume":"387","author":"Villar","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0575","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.12.023","article-title":"From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts","volume":"220","author":"Hoftiezer","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0580","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2007-2564","article-title":"Can birth weight standards based on healthy populations improve the identification of small-for-gestational-age newborns at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes?","volume":"123","author":"Ferdynus","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0585","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.011","article-title":"Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial\/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age","volume":"219","author":"Blue","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0590","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14008","article-title":"Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard","volume":"123","author":"Cheng","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0595","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17514","article-title":"Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21(st) and World Health Organization estimated fetal weight reference curves","volume":"51","author":"Cheng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20299","article-title":"Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards","volume":"55","author":"Kabiri","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1533945","article-title":"Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes","volume":"33","author":"Nwabuobi","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20413","article-title":"Performance of different fetal growth charts in prediction of large-for-gestational age and associated neonatal morbidity in multiethnic obese population","volume":"56","author":"Verger","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0615","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22151","article-title":"Performance of six birthweight and estimated fetal weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes: a 10-year nationwide population-based study","volume":"58","author":"Choi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002923","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002923","article-title":"Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Pritchard","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2021.01.022","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of fetal growth charts for placenta-related fetal growth restriction","volume":"105","author":"Melamed","year":"2021","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0630","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05747-4","article-title":"Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth","volume":"303","author":"Hiersch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0635","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03640-9","article-title":"The impact of optimal dating on the assessment of fetal growth","volume":"21","author":"Fries","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0640","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2021.102308","article-title":"World Health Organization fetal growth charts applied in a French birth cohort","volume":"51","author":"Hocquette","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0645","article-title":"Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study","author":"Monier","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0650","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04324-0","article-title":"Which chart and which cut-point: deciding on the INTERGROWTH, World Health Organization, or Hadlock fetal growth chart","volume":"22","author":"Liauw","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0655","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3955","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1844657","article-title":"Application of new fetal growth standards in a multiethnic population","volume":"35","author":"Thoreau","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0660","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.06.059","article-title":"Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population","volume":"252","author":"Stampalija","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0665","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.08.054","article-title":"Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile","volume":"224","author":"Sovio","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0670","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0262760","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0262760","article-title":"Assessing fetal growth in Africa: Application of the international WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st standards in a Beninese pregnancy cohort","volume":"17","author":"Yovo","year":"2022","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0675","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17287","article-title":"Birth weight in live births and stillbirths","volume":"48","author":"Poon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0680","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002902","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002902","article-title":"Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study","volume":"16","author":"Vieira","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0685","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0172910","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0172910","article-title":"Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada","volume":"12","author":"Liu","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"10134","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0690","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1995","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)30292-7","article-title":"Clarification of INTERGROWTH-21(st) newborn birthweight standards","volume":"391","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0695","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2634","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1670795","article-title":"Comparison of Fenton 2013 growth curves and Intergrowth-21 growth standards to assess the incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and extrauterine growth restriction in preterm neonates <=32 weeks","volume":"34","author":"Reddy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0700","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2252","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1339270","article-title":"Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21\u00a0and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants","volume":"31","author":"Tuzun","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0705","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2977","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1676412","article-title":"Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population","volume":"34","author":"Kajdy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0710","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/apa.16275","article-title":"Identifying small for gestational age preterm infants from the Finnish Medical Birth Register using eight growth charts","author":"Hocquette","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Paediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0715","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lanepe.2021.100167","article-title":"International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: a population-based study in 15\u00a0European countries","volume":"8","author":"Hocquette","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet Reg Health Eur"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0720","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1097\/00001648-200209000-00013","article-title":"Birth weight and perinatal mortality: a comparison of \u201coptimal\u201d birth weight in seven Western European countries","volume":"13","author":"Graafmans","year":"2002","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0725","article-title":"Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21(st) standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term","volume":"218","author":"Francis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0730","article-title":"The satisfactory growth and development at 2\u00a0years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards","volume":"218","author":"Villar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0735","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13148","article-title":"Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study","volume":"122","author":"Monier","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20414","article-title":"Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study","volume":"55","author":"Ego","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 &amp; S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S246871892200318X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S246871892200318X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:43:29Z","timestamp":1762854209000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S246871892200318X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"references-count":74,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S246871892200318X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2468-7189"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Revue de la litt\u00e9rature des courbes intra-ut\u00e9rines et de poids de naissance","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.09.014","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}