{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T17:59:47Z","timestamp":1769277587664,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":244,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T22:02:11Z","timestamp":1665439331000},"page":"7-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["La technique de la c\u00e9sarienne\u00a0: recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"L.","family":"Sentilhes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Schmitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Madar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Bouchghoul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Fuchs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Garab\u00e9dian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Korb","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Nouette-Gaulain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"P\u00e9cheux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Sanan\u00e8s","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Sibiude","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.-V.","family":"S\u00e9nat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"10038","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2655","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00981-2","article-title":"Perioperative thermoregulation and heat balance","volume":"387","author":"Sessler","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1097\/01.anes.0000296719.73450.52","article-title":"The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement","volume":"108","author":"Rajagopalan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199605093341901","article-title":"Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group","volume":"334","author":"Kurz","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1997.03540380041029","article-title":"Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial","volume":"277","author":"Frank","year":"1997","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199712000-00009","article-title":"Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs postanesthetic recovery","volume":"87","author":"Lenhardt","year":"1997","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2013.09.049","article-title":"Hypothermia and early neonatal mortality in preterm infants","volume":"164","author":"de Almeida","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.01.190","article-title":"The impact of ambient operating room temperature on neonatal and maternal hypothermia and associated morbidities: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"214","author":"Duryea","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1055","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2013-2544","article-title":"Reducing hypothermia in preterm infants following delivery","volume":"133","author":"Russo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aev325","article-title":"The Effect of patient warming during caesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis","volume":"115","author":"Sultan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2019.09.006","article-title":"Warming strategies for preventing hypothermia and shivering during cesarean section: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","volume":"71","author":"Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1097\/NMC.0000000000000599","article-title":"Preventing hypothermia during cesarean birth: an integrative review","volume":"45","author":"Dendis","year":"2020","journal-title":"MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2017.04.008","article-title":"Does the addition of active body warming to in-line intravenous fluid warming prevent maternal hypothermia during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Chebbout","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000001181","article-title":"Active warming utilizing combined IV fluid and forced-air warming decreases hypothermia and improves maternal comfort during cesarean delivery: a randomized control trial","volume":"122","author":"Cobb","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.01.190","article-title":"The impact of ambient operating room temperature on neonatal and maternal hypothermia and associated morbidities: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"214","author":"Duryea","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2013.09.049","article-title":"Hypothermia and early neonatal mortality in preterm infants","volume":"164","author":"de Almeida","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1055","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2013-2544","article-title":"Reducing hypothermia in preterm infants following delivery","volume":"133","author":"Russo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e150277","DOI":"10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2015.0277","article-title":"Association between admission temperature and mortality and major morbidity in preterm infants born at fewer than 33 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"169","author":"Lyu","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA Pediatr"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aev325","article-title":"The Effect of patient warming during caesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis","volume":"115","author":"Sultan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000000160","article-title":"The incidence and prevention of hypothermia in newborn bonding after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"118","author":"Horn","year":"2014","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-200202000-00034","article-title":"Active warming during cesarean delivery","volume":"94","author":"Horn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2008.12.010","article-title":"Effect of administration of pre-warmed intravenous fluids on the frequency of hypothermia following spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery","volume":"21","author":"Yokoyama","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1543986","article-title":"Active warming during cesarean delivery: Should we SCIP it?","volume":"32","author":"Grant","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0115","first-page":"6","article-title":"Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section","volume":"6","author":"Hadiati","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1669907","article-title":"Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine preoperative skin antisepsis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Tolcher","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.060","article-title":"A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial","volume":"217","author":"Springel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.926884","article-title":"Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Kunkle","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"04","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2016.64031","article-title":"Antiseptic skin preparation for preventing surgical site infection at caesarean section","volume":"06","author":"Aworinde","year":"2016","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0140","series-title":"Gestion pr\u00e9op\u00e9ratoire du risque infectieux. Conf\u00e9rence de consensus","author":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Fran\u00e7aise d\u2019hygi\u00e8ne hospitali\u00e8re","year":"2004"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2017.0904","article-title":"Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017","volume":"152","author":"Berri\u00f3s-Torres","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1669907","article-title":"Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine preoperative skin antisepsis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Tolcher","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3267","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1368481","article-title":"Optimal skin antiseptic agents for prevention of surgical site infection in cesarean section: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis","volume":"31","author":"Huang","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1511048","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery","volume":"374","author":"Tuuli","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.060","article-title":"A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial","volume":"217","author":"Springel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001118","article-title":"Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery","volume":"126","author":"Ngai","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.926884","article-title":"Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Kunkle","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1097\/01.EBX.0000479690.07770.cb","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine skin antisepsis in reducing surgical site infection in cesarean sections","volume":"6","author":"Salama","year":"2016","journal-title":"Evid Based Women\u02bcs Heal J"},{"issue":"04","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2016.64031","article-title":"Antiseptic skin preparation for preventing surgical site infection at caesarean section","volume":"06","author":"Aworinde","year":"2016","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1749","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.798291","article-title":"Can we reduce the surgical site infection rate in cesarean sections using a chlorhexidine-based antisepsis protocol?","volume":"26","author":"Amer-Alshiek","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0195","article-title":"Povidone-iodine 1% is the most effective vaginal antiseptic for preventing post-cesarean endometritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","volume":"221","author":"Roeckner","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0200","series-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology","article-title":"Vaginal Cleansing before Cesarean Delivery [Internet]. Vol. 130","author":"Caissutti","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0205","article-title":"Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections (Review)","volume":"7","author":"Haas","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2011.568644","article-title":"Preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine on post-caesarean infectious morbidity","volume":"31","author":"Asghania","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) [Internet]"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1219996","article-title":"Chlorhexidine vaginal wipes prior to elective cesarean section: does it reduce infectious morbidity? A randomized trial","volume":"30","author":"Ahmed","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.11.002","article-title":"Vaginal cleansing prior to caesarian section: To do or not to do? A randomized trial","volume":"48","author":"Aref","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod [Internet]"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0225","article-title":"Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for reducing post partum morbidity","volume":"4","author":"Hanan El Sayed","year":"2015","journal-title":"IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci Ver I [Internet]"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2316","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.693994","article-title":"Does vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine prior to caesarean delivery reduce the risk of endometritis. A randomized controlled trial","volume":"25","author":"Yildirim","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/S1068-607X(02)00119-1","article-title":"Post-cesarean related infection and vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine revisited","volume":"9","author":"Guzman","year":"2002","journal-title":"Prim Care Update Ob Gyns"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000164032.16599.7e","article-title":"Preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine and the risk of postcesarean endometritis","volume":"105","author":"Starr","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol [Internet]"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14060","article-title":"Preoperative vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine solution in preventing post-cesarean section infections in a low resource setting: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Ogah","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13737","article-title":"Vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine at cesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis: a randomized pilot trial (PREPS)","volume":"99","author":"Hodgetts-Morton","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.005","article-title":"Vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery to reduce postoperative infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"202","author":"Haas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0260","first-page":"2","article-title":"Impact of preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone iodine on post cesarean infection","volume":"2","author":"Barat","year":"2016","journal-title":"Casp J Reprod Med [Internet]"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0265","first-page":"147","article-title":"Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine and postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"97","author":"Reid","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol [Internet]"},{"issue":"38","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0270","first-page":"18","article-title":"Cesarean section without urethral catheterization: a randomized control trial","volume":"10","author":"Acharya","year":"2012","journal-title":"Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00144-9","article-title":"Indwelling urinary catheters in cesarean delivery","volume":"83","author":"Ghoreishi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2009.4","article-title":"Evaluation of the use vs nonuse of urinary catheterization during cesarean delivery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Nasr","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2005.00237.x","article-title":"Elective cesarean section without urethral catheterization","volume":"31","author":"Senanayake","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02802.x","article-title":"Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Li","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0295","first-page":"CD010322","article-title":"Indwelling bladder catheterisation as part of intraoperative and postoperative care for caesarean section","volume":"11","author":"Abdel-Aleem","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0300","first-page":"QC01","article-title":"Indwelling catheterization in caesarean section: time to retire it!","volume":"9","author":"Pandey","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13013","article-title":"French ambulatory cesarean: mother and newborn safety","volume":"148","author":"Dimassi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90288-6","article-title":"Current use of the extraperitoneal cesarean section: a decade of experience","volume":"149","author":"Hanson","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1258\/td.2012.120241","article-title":"Modified extraperitoneal caesarean section: clinical experience","volume":"42","author":"Shinde","year":"2012","journal-title":"Trop Doct"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.05.057","article-title":"Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity","volume":"209","author":"Tappauf","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(84)80171-4","article-title":"Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a surgical form of infection prophylaxis?","volume":"148","author":"Wallace","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1499718","article-title":"Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial","volume":"33","author":"Yapca","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0245645","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0245645","article-title":"The extraperitoneal French AmbUlatory cesarean section technique leads to improved pain scores and a faster maternal autonomy compared with the intraperitoneal Misgav Ladach technique: a prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"16","author":"Dimassi","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0340","first-page":"CD004662","article-title":"Techniques for caesarean section","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00315-5","article-title":"Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity?","volume":"72","author":"Ferrari","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1040","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.811108.x","article-title":"Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?","volume":"81","author":"Franchi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.5152\/jtgga.2013.07","article-title":"A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section","volume":"14","author":"Saha","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0360","first-page":"929","article-title":"Short-term outcome of newborn infants born by a modified procedure of cesarean section. A prospective randomized study","volume":"77","author":"Dani","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994066","article-title":"A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Franchi","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.08.001","article-title":"Maternal infection rates after cesarean delivery by Pfannenstiel or Joel-Cohen incision: a multicenter surveillance study","volume":"147","author":"Dumas","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.12.020","article-title":"Omission of the bladder flap at caesarean section reduces delivery time without increased morbidity: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"174","author":"O\u2019Neill","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31824c0e12","article-title":"Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"119","author":"Tuuli","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0385","first-page":"152","article-title":"Comparing formation or non-formation of bladder flap at cesarean section on perioperative and postoperative complications: double-blind clinical trial","volume":"11","author":"Akhlaghi","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Family Reprod Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1159\/000481283","article-title":"Omission of a bladder flap during cesarean birth in primiparous women","volume":"83","author":"Aslan Cetin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.001","article-title":"Effect of avoiding bladder flap formation in caesarean section on repeat caesarean delivery","volume":"159","author":"Malvasi","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3369-5","article-title":"Urinary symptoms after bladder flap at the time of primary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial (RTC)","volume":"29","author":"O\u2019Boyle","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0405","first-page":"1089","article-title":"Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial","volume":"98","author":"Hohlagschwandtner","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0410","first-page":"CD004732","article-title":"Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section","volume":"22","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.050","article-title":"Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis","volume":"211","author":"Saad","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.10.886","article-title":"Blunt vs. sharp uterine expansion at lower segment cesarean section delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis","volume":"208","author":"Xu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0425","first-page":"837","article-title":"Unintended extension of the lower segment uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of sharp versus blunt techniques","volume":"31","author":"Asicioglu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0430","first-page":"448","article-title":"Intra-operative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial","volume":"109","author":"Magann","year":"2002","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.035","article-title":"Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision during cesarean delivery","volume":"202","author":"Xodo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.04.231","article-title":"Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse hysterotomy during cesarean delivery decreases maternal morbidity: a meta-analysis","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.013","article-title":"Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques","volume":"199","author":"Cromi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0450","first-page":"1952","article-title":"Is cephalad-caudad blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision really associated with less uncontrolled extensions to decrease intra-operative blood loss? A prospective randomised-controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Ozcan","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.04.004","article-title":"Type of blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision during caesarean section and the risk of postoperative complications: a prospective randomized controlled trial","volume":"41","author":"Morales","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0460","first-page":"837","article-title":"Unintended extension of the lower segment uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of sharp versus blunt techniques","volume":"31","author":"Asicioglu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40","article-title":"Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births","volume":"109","author":"Declercq","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0470","series-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Vol. 2014","author":"Smaill","year":"2014"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1404","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2011.725","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs. after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"146","author":"Witt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(99)00225-8","article-title":"The routine use of cefazolin in cesarean section","volume":"69","author":"Rouzi","year":"2000","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0485","first-page":"143","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"Bagratee","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600697538","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial on prevention of postcesarean infection using penicillin and cephalothin in Brazil","volume":"85","author":"Vieira Cunha Rudge","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1382","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1052397","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent postoperative infectious morbidity in low-risk elective cesarean deliveries: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"29","author":"Hong","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1159\/000291403","article-title":"Ampicillin\/sulbactam versus cefotetan for the prevention of infection following cesarean delivery in high-risk patients: a randomized double-blind trial","volume":"44","author":"Bracero","year":"1997","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0505","first-page":"10","article-title":"Ampicillin\/Sulbactam versus Cefuroxime as antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: A randomized study","volume":"30","author":"Ziogos","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Infect Dis"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0510","first-page":"165","article-title":"An efficacy study of ampicillin versus cefazolin prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section","volume":"76","author":"Chantharojwong","year":"1993","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thail"},{"issue":"Suppl. A","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0515","first-page":"83","article-title":"Cefotaxime, cefazolin, or ampicillin prophylaxis of febrile morbidity in emergency cesarean sections","volume":"5","author":"Louie","year":"1982","journal-title":"Clin Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.09.017","article-title":"Prophylactic ampicillin versus cefazolin for the prevention of post-cesarean infectious morbidity in Rwanda","volume":"124","author":"Mivumbi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0525","first-page":"273","article-title":"The role of prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a randomised trial","volume":"47","author":"Ng","year":"1992","journal-title":"Med J Malaysia"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-012-0148-6","article-title":"A Randomized controlled trial comparing two different antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis at cesarean section","volume":"62","author":"Kamilya","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol India"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0535","first-page":"709","article-title":"Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing cesarean section. A comparative trial","volume":"31","author":"Saltzman","year":"1986","journal-title":"J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0540","series-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","article-title":"Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Vol. 2014","author":"Gyte","year":"2014"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0545","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(90)91290-S","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis: Is there a difference?","volume":"162","author":"Faro","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0550","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1602044","article-title":"Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery","volume":"375","author":"Tita","year":"2016","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0555","first-page":"1183","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial of extended spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with coverage for Ureaplasma urealyticum to reduce post-cesarean delivery endometritis","volume":"101","author":"Andrews","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0560","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1989.tb01696.x","article-title":"Single dose prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean sections","volume":"29","author":"Chan","year":"1989","journal-title":"Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0565","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1097\/01.SMJ.0000060570.51934.14","article-title":"Cefazolin versus cefazolin plus metronidazole for antibiotic prophylaxis at cesarean section","volume":"96","author":"Meyer","year":"2003","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0570","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.26719\/2004.10.3.277","article-title":"Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin\/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section","volume":"10","author":"Ahmed","year":"2004","journal-title":"East Mediterr Heal J"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0575","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802220490","article-title":"Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities","volume":"21","author":"Alekwe","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0580","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.4103\/aam.aam_39_19","article-title":"The efficacy of two doses versus 7 days\u2019 course of prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section: An experience from Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital","volume":"19","author":"Mohammed","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Afr Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0585","first-page":"45","article-title":"Prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section: effect of a short preoperative course of benzyl penicillin or clindamycin plus gentamicin on postoperative infectious morbidity","volume":"12","author":"Rehu","year":"1980","journal-title":"Ann Clin Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0590","series-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","article-title":"Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Vol. 2014","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0595","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-2906-9","article-title":"Comparison of administration of single dose ceftriaxone for elective caesarean section before skin incision and after cord clamping in preventing post-operative infectious morbidity","volume":"288","author":"Kalaranjini","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1404","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.2011.725","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs. after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial","volume":"146","author":"Witt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1526-y","article-title":"A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn","volume":"17","author":"Jyothirmayi","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1560","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12102","article-title":"Optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotic for cesarean delivery: a randomized comparative study","volume":"39","author":"Bhattacharjee","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0615","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2013.56","article-title":"Timing of prophylactic antibiotic at cesarean section: a double-blinded, randomized trial","volume":"33","author":"Francis","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0620","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.823938","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis at elective cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial in a low resource setting","volume":"27","author":"Kandil","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1295657","article-title":"The timing of antibiotics at cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"MacOnes","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0630","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.022","article-title":"Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"196","author":"Sullivan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0635","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0845-7","article-title":"When should we perform prophylactic antibiotics in elective cesarean cases?","volume":"280","author":"Yildirim","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0640","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.3109\/14767059709161955","article-title":"Single dose cefazolin prophylaxis for postcesarean infections: before vs. after cord clamping","volume":"6","author":"Wax","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0645","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0129434","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0129434","article-title":"Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery: a multi-center randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis","volume":"10","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0650","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1186\/1756-0500-6-57","article-title":"Prophylactic ceftizoxime for elective cesarean delivery at Soba Hospital, Sudan","volume":"6","author":"Osman","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Res Notes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0655","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2019.03.001","article-title":"Impact of early exposure to cefuroxime on the composition of the gut microbiota in infants following cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Kamal","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0660","first-page":"CD011689","article-title":"Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis","volume":"12","author":"Gallos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0665","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1524","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-020-01779-1","article-title":"Carbetocin compared with oxytocin in non-elective cesarean delivery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized-controlled trials","volume":"67","author":"Onwochei","year":"2020","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0670","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.1002394","article-title":"Carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"29","author":"Jin","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0675","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"929","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02585.x","article-title":"Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following caesarean section: the results of a double-blind randomised trial","volume":"117","author":"Attilakos","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0680","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1043882","article-title":"Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in obese nulliparous women undergoing emergency cesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"El Behery","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0685","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.12.017","article-title":"Carbetocin compared to oxytocin in emergency cesarean section: a randomized trial","volume":"198","author":"Razali","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0690","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.01.025","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial comparing carbetocin, misoprostol, and oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage following an elective cesarean delivery","volume":"134","author":"Elbohoty","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0695","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3866","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1149564","article-title":"Carbetocin versus oxytocin to reduce additional uterotonic use at non-elective caesarean section: a double-blind, randomised trial","volume":"29","author":"Whigham","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0700","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2807","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1355907","article-title":"Efficacy of oxytocin versus carbetocin in prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section under general anesthesia: a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"31","author":"Taheripanah","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0705","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/1374150","article-title":"Adverse effects of carbetocin versus oxytocin in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"2018","author":"Mannaerts","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0710","first-page":"CD004737","article-title":"Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section","author":"Anorlu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0715","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-2759-2","article-title":"The effect of placental removal method on perioperative hemorrhage at cesarean delivery\u00a0; a randomized clinical trial","volume":"288","author":"G\u00fcn","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0720","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3308","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1369522","article-title":"Manual removal versus spontaneous delivery of the placenta at cesarean section in developing countries: a randomized controlled trial and review of literature","volume":"31","author":"Kamel","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0725","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13797","article-title":"How can methods of placental delivery in cesarean section affect perioperative blood loss?. A randomized controlled trial of controlled cord traction versus manual removal of placenta","volume":"45","author":"Altraigey","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0730","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1999.00798.x","article-title":"Ondansetron versus placebo for the control of nausea and vomiting during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia","volume":"54","author":"Abouleish","year":"1999","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0735","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.1998.tb04922.x","article-title":"Granisetron prevents nausea and vomiting during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section","volume":"42","author":"Fujii","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0740","first-page":"CD007579","article-title":"Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section","volume":"5","author":"Griffiths","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0745","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199611000-00014","article-title":"Intraoperative antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron versus droperidol for cesarean section patients under epidural anesthesia","volume":"83","author":"Pan","year":"1996","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0750","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(01)00294-X","article-title":"Comparing the efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide, ondansetron, and placebo in cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia","volume":"13","author":"Pan","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0755","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1789","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D","article-title":"Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery","volume":"96","author":"Charuluxananan","year":"2003","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0760","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/87.3.502","article-title":"Prophylactic ondansetron does not improve patient satisfaction in women using PCA after caesarean section","volume":"87","author":"Cherian","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0765","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000277494.30502.db","article-title":"Transdermal scopolamine for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced nausea and vomiting after cesarean delivery","volume":"105","author":"Harnett","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0770","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2011.08.002","article-title":"Reduction in spinal-induced hypotension with ondansetron in parturients undergoing caesarean section: a double-blind randomised, placebo-controlled study","volume":"21","author":"Sahoo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0775","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(01)00381-6","article-title":"Prophylactic ondansetron is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting but not on pruritus after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine","volume":"14","author":"Yazigi","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0780","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2253-15-18","article-title":"Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section","volume":"15","author":"Koju","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0785","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1017\/S0265021506000482","article-title":"Ondansetron or droperidol for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine","volume":"23","author":"Peixoto","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0790","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1213\/ane.0b013e3181a45a6b","article-title":"Serotonin receptor antagonists for the prevention and treatment of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"109","author":"George","year":"2009","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0795","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814e23","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1211035","article-title":"Ondansetron in pregnancy and risk of adverse fetal outcomes","volume":"368","author":"Pasternak","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0800","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/85.6.865","article-title":"Dexamethasone for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-caesarean section analgesia: comparison of droperidol and saline","volume":"85","author":"Tzeng","year":"2000","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0805","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.11.004","article-title":"Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine for cesarean section: a randomized comparison of dexamethasone, droperidol, and a combination","volume":"16","author":"Wu","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03019733","article-title":"Dexamethasone prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-cesarean analgesia","volume":"48","author":"Wang","year":"2001","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0815","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeg120","article-title":"Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal morphine for caesarean section: comparison of cyclizine, dexamethasone and placebo","volume":"90","author":"Nortcliffe","year":"2003","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03018234","article-title":"The efficacy of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists combined with droperidol for PONV prophylaxis is similar to their combination with dexamethasone. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"51","author":"Habib","year":"2004","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0825","article-title":"Prophylaxis of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients during cesarean section in spinal anesthesia","volume":"19","author":"Voigt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Sci Mon Int Med J Exp Clin Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615e23","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182839fee","article-title":"Antiemetics added to phenylephrine infusion during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Habib","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0835","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.11.004","article-title":"Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine for Cesarean section: a randomized comparison of dexamethasone, droperidol, and a combination","volume":"16","author":"Wu","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0840","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.4314\/ahs.v14i2.23","article-title":"Dexamethasone versus a combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for caesarean section","volume":"14","author":"Imeh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Afr Health Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0845","first-page":"CD004732","article-title":"Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0850","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15048","article-title":"Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"125","author":"Stegwee","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0855","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17401","article-title":"Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs. double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"50","author":"Di Spiezio Sardo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0860","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13714","article-title":"Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure","volume":"99","author":"Hanacek","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0865","first-page":"1","article-title":"An optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section: a randomized controlled study","volume":"9","author":"Kalem","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Investig Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0870","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16472","article-title":"Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial","volume":"128","author":"Stegwee","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0875","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4702-z","article-title":"Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study","volume":"297","author":"Tekiner","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"10039","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0880","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"388","author":"CORONIS collaborative group","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0885","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0187850","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0187850","article-title":"Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study","volume":"12","author":"Thisted","year":"2017","journal-title":"PloS One"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0890","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2011.04.013","article-title":"Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture","volume":"115","author":"Roberge","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0895","first-page":"CD000085","article-title":"Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section","author":"Jacobs-Jokhan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0900","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.01.009","article-title":"Extraabdominal vs. intraabdominal uterine repair at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis","volume":"20","author":"Walsh","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0905","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-015-0448-2","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"62","author":"Zaphiratos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth"},{"issue":"9888","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0910","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60441-9","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"382","author":"CORONIS Collaborative Group","year":"2013","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0915","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003821","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair of hysterotomy after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"135","author":"Mireault","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0920","first-page":"1","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"2","author":"Mohr-Sasson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0925","first-page":"131","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair: effect on intraoperative nausea and vomiting during repeat cesarean delivery\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a randomized clinical trial","volume":"10","author":"Abdellah","year":"2018","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis ObGyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0930","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.05.004","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery","volume":"127","author":"El-Khayat","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0935","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816521e2","article-title":"Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"111","author":"Coutinho","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0940","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2006.10.009","article-title":"Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial","volume":"16","author":"Nafisi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0945","first-page":"CD000163","article-title":"Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes","volume":"11","author":"Bamigboye","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0950","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1190826","article-title":"Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study","volume":"30","author":"Kurek Eken","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0955","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1366","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70686-5","article-title":"Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery","volume":"174","author":"Nagele","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0960","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.5812\/atr.8327","article-title":"Closure or non-closure of peritoneum in cesarean section: outcomes of short-term complications","volume":"1","author":"Tabasi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Trauma Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0965","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-215","article-title":"CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study","volume":"13","author":"Group","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0970","first-page":"1007","article-title":"Closure vs. non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study","volume":"87","author":"Weerawetwat","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Med Assoc Thai"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0975","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.12.019","article-title":"Effects of visceral peritoneal closure on scar formation at cesarean delivery","volume":"105","author":"Malvasi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0980","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.003","article-title":"To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section","volume":"147","author":"Cheong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0985","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02808.x","article-title":"Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Shi","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0990","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0987-6","article-title":"Does visceral peritoneal closure affect post-cesarean urinary symptoms? A randomized clinical trial","volume":"21","author":"Shahin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10039","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib0995","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"388","author":"Group","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1000","first-page":"CD000163","article-title":"Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes","volume":"11","author":"Bamigboye","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"922","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1190826","article-title":"Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study","volume":"30","author":"Kurek Eken","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00027","article-title":"Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean","volume":"77","author":"Pietrantoni","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.5812\/atr.8327","article-title":"Closure or non-closure of peritoneum in cesarean section: outcomes of short-term complications","volume":"1","author":"Tabasi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Trauma Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.770458","article-title":"Parietal peritoneal closure versus non-closure at caesarean section: which technique is feasible to perform?","volume":"26","author":"Altinbas","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.09.012","article-title":"Parietal peritoneal closure and persistent postcesarean pain","volume":"104","author":"Shahin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1030","first-page":"741","article-title":"Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study","volume":"77","author":"Hojberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-215","article-title":"CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study","volume":"13","author":"Group","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.06.003","article-title":"To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section","volume":"147","author":"Cheong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02808.x","article-title":"Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"118","author":"Shi","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"10039","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"388","author":"Group","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.037","article-title":"Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors","volume":"190","author":"H\u00e4ger","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14593","article-title":"The impact of subcutaneous tissue suturing at caesarean section on wound complications: a meta-analysis","volume":"124","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00427-F","article-title":"Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women","volume":"85","author":"Naumann","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123823","article-title":"Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"186","author":"Magann","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1075","first-page":"327","article-title":"Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A prospective, randomized trial","volume":"45","author":"Allaire","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)02836-1","article-title":"Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue","volume":"57","author":"Cetin","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03305-z","article-title":"Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial","volume":"20","author":"Poprzeczny","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1090","first-page":"299","article-title":"Maternal obesity and risk of post-cesarean wound complications","volume":"31","author":"Conner","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1095","first-page":"923","article-title":"Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness","volume":"95","author":"Vermillion","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3885","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2016.1151869","article-title":"Cesarean delivery complications in women with morbid obesity","volume":"29","author":"Yamasato","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124807.76451.47","article-title":"Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Chelmow","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(94)00427-F","article-title":"Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women","volume":"85","author":"Naumann","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)02836-1","article-title":"Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue","volume":"57","author":"Cetin","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1120","first-page":"327","article-title":"Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A prospective, randomized trial","volume":"45","author":"Allaire","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123823","article-title":"Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"186","author":"Magann","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.6.403.408","article-title":"Closure of the subcutaneous dead space and wound disruption after Cesarean delivery","volume":"11","author":"Chelmow","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14593","article-title":"The impact of subcutaneous tissue suturing at caesarean section on wound complications: a meta-analysis","volume":"124","author":"Pergialiotis","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15552","article-title":"Suture is still the gold standard for closure of the skin incision at caesarean delivery","volume":"126","author":"Berghella","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","article-title":"Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis","volume":"212","author":"Mackeen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.02.001","article-title":"Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial","volume":"203","author":"Cromi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002484","article-title":"Suture compared with staple closure of skin incision for high-order cesarean deliveries","volume":"131","author":"Fox","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000227","article-title":"Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3274-9","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with \u201cstaples\u201d or \u201csubcuticular sutures\u201d in emergency cesarean section","volume":"290","author":"Sharma","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.07.011","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs. staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"203","author":"Basha","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3830","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1474870","article-title":"Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure","volume":"32","author":"Fleisher","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001043","article-title":"Pain associated with cesarean delivery skin closure: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"126","author":"Mackeen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1185","first-page":"299","article-title":"Maternal obesity and risk of post-cesarean wound complications","volume":"31","author":"Conner","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.12.020","article-title":"Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis","volume":"212","author":"Mackeen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.07.011","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs. staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery","volume":"203","author":"Basha","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827a072c","article-title":"Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Figueroa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol [Internet]"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000227","article-title":"Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12142","article-title":"Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome","volume":"92","author":"Huppelschoten","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.02.011","article-title":"Comparison of staples vs. subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"218","author":"Zaki","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002_bib1220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.89","article-title":"Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture","volume":"36","author":"Zaki","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718922002951?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718922002951?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:42:59Z","timestamp":1762854179000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718922002951"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"references-count":244,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718922002951"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"La technique de la c\u00e9sarienne\u00a0: recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Coll\u00e8ge national des gyn\u00e9cologues obst\u00e9triciens fran\u00e7ais","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2022.10.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}