{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T09:41:41Z","timestamp":1769938901039,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11-12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,23]],"date-time":"2024-11-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732320000000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":388,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,1]],"date-time":"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698796800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,20]],"date-time":"2023-09-20T12:32:05Z","timestamp":1695213125000},"page":"524-530","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparaison pragmatique des courbes de biom\u00e9tries f\u0153tales \u00e9l\u00e9mentaires"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"51","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3246-8727","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ferdinand","family":"Dhombres","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6372-9235","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mona","family":"Massoud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0175","series-title":"Rapport de la Conf\u00e9rence nationale de l\u2019\u00e9chographie de d\u00e9pistage pr\u00e9natal (CNEOF)","first-page":"1","author":"Lansac","year":"2016"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0180","article-title":"Conference nationale de l\u2019echographie obstetricale et f. [The French National Committee on Obstetrical and Fetal Ultrasound guidelines 2022 (CNEOF)]","year":"2023","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0185","first-page":"570","article-title":"[Ante- and postnatal growth charts in France - guidelines for clinical practice from the College national des gynecologues et obstetriciens francais (CNGOF) and from the Societe francaise de neonatologie (SFN)]","volume":"50","author":"Verspyck","year":"2022","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.150.2.6691115","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements","volume":"150","author":"Hadlock","year":"1984","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2733","article-title":"French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts","volume":"28","author":"Salomon","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002220","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002220","article-title":"The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight","volume":"14","author":"Kiserud","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"9946","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61490-2","article-title":"International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project","volume":"384","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13078.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x","article-title":"Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements","volume":"101","author":"Chitty","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12526","article-title":"Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards?","volume":"33","author":"Heude","year":"2019","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17223","article-title":"Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards in France: a \u2018flash study\u2019 of the College Francais d\u2019Echographie Foetale (CFEF)","volume":"49","author":"Stirnemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21929","article-title":"Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans","volume":"55","author":"Drukker","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03640-9","article-title":"The impact of optimal dating on the assessment of fetal growth","volume":"21","author":"Fries","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.10082","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements","volume":"39","author":"Sarris","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90027-9","article-title":"The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly","volume":"149","author":"Chervenak","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0260","first-page":"908","article-title":"A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly","volume":"69","author":"Chervenak","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2016-0220","article-title":"Prenatal screening for microcephaly: an update after three decades","volume":"45","author":"Gelber","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejpn.2018.06.002","article-title":"Diagnostic approach to fetal microcephaly","volume":"22","author":"Leibovitz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Paediatr Neurol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-019-05234-5","article-title":"Ultrasound diagnosis of microcephaly: a comparison of three reference curves and postnatal diagnosis","volume":"300","author":"Monteiro de Castro Doin Trigo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4020","article-title":"Association of midtrimester short femur and short humerus with fetal growth restriction","volume":"33","author":"de Carvalho","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5265","article-title":"Outcome of fetuses with antenatally diagnosed short femur","volume":"31","author":"Papageorghiou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00015.x","article-title":"Fetal short femur length in the second trimester and the outcome of pregnancy","volume":"111","author":"Todros","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/jcu.20889","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes after sonographic detection of isolated short femur in the second trimester","volume":"40","author":"Ventura","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4068","article-title":"Association of isolated short fetal femur with intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"33","author":"Vermeer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1053\/sper.2003.50012","article-title":"Use of genetic sonography for adjusting the risk for fetal Down syndrome","volume":"27","author":"Nyberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1962","article-title":"Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics","volume":"26","author":"Drooger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13470","article-title":"Midtrimester isolated short femur and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"98","author":"D\u2019Ambrosio","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8954","article-title":"Narrowed beam width in newer ultrasound machines shortens measurements in the lateral direction: fetal measurement charts may be obsolete","volume":"38","author":"Okland","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19013","article-title":"Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure","volume":"53","author":"Khalil","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17021","article-title":"Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study","volume":"129","author":"Monier","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17108","article-title":"Re: Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational-age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study","volume":"129","author":"Figueras","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17143","article-title":"Assessing the performance of growth charts: a difficult endeavour","author":"Bessis","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718923001836?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468718923001836?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:43:14Z","timestamp":1762854194000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468718923001836"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11-12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468718923001836"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7189"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7189","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparaison pragmatique des courbes de biom\u00e9tries f\u0153tales \u00e9l\u00e9mentaires","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Fertilit\u00e9 & S\u00e9nologie\u00a0","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gofs.2023.09.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}