{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T10:21:49Z","timestamp":1706610109960},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","em-consulte.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique & Fertilit\u00e9"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,22]],"date-time":"2016-05-22T17:04:37Z","timestamp":1463936677000},"page":"329-335","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Les mesures \u00e9chographiques de la longueur cervicale et de la hauteur de la pr\u00e9sentation f\u0153tale sont-elles pr\u00e9dictives de l\u2019issue d\u2019accouchement chez des patientes \u00e0 terme\u00a0?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"T.","family":"Vernet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Rivaux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Deruelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.006","article-title":"\u00c9pid\u00e9miologie de la grossesse prolong\u00e9e\u00a0: incidence et morbidit\u00e9 maternelle","volume":"40","author":"Chantry","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.007","article-title":"Fetal and neonatal complications related to prolonged pregnancy","volume":"40","author":"Chantry","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00049-5","article-title":"Post-term birth: risk factors and outcomes in a 10-year cohort of Norwegian births","volume":"89","author":"Campbell","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.446","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal complications related to post-term delivery: a national register-based study, 1978\u20131993","volume":"189","author":"Olesen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0185","first-page":"1312","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management for post-term pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2011.09.019","article-title":"Assessment of the benefit-harm balance depending on gestational age to induce delivery for post-term pregnancies","volume":"40","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.01.026","article-title":"Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"169","author":"Vayssi\u00e8re","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-199803000-00006","article-title":"Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery","volume":"91","author":"Hendrix","year":"1998","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00415-8","article-title":"The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction","volume":"90","author":"Williams","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","article-title":"Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis","volume":"49","author":"Crane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.105399","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction","volume":"182","author":"Ware","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound","volume":"40","author":"Paterson-Brown","year":"1991","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","author":"Reis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0230","first-page":"26","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"98","author":"Chandra","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2004.11.006","article-title":"Comparison of preinduction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins","volume":"33","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902730417","article-title":"Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?","volume":"88","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00765.x","article-title":"Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy","volume":"20","author":"Valentin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2744","article-title":"Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term","volume":"27","author":"Eggeb\u00f8","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200312000-00026","article-title":"Ultrasound assessment of the cervix","volume":"46","author":"Berghella","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91469-2","article-title":"Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance","volume":"172","author":"Iams","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80035-X","article-title":"Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length","volume":"176","author":"Rozenberg","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13411","article-title":"Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography","volume":"44","author":"Pereira","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1765","article-title":"Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique","volume":"25","author":"Dietz","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6294","article-title":"Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the \u201cangle of progression\u201d predict the mode of delivery?","volume":"33","author":"Kalache","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2011.07.012","article-title":"The diagnosis of fetal head engagement: transperineal ultrasound, a new useful tool?","volume":"40","author":"Rivaux","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.102","article-title":"Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations","volume":"21","author":"Sherer","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2012.03.005","article-title":"Preliminary study of fetal head engagement diagnosis by transperineal ultrasound before operative vaginal delivery","volume":"41","author":"Raia-Barjat","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2009.04.001","article-title":"Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study","volume":"38","author":"Maticot-Baptista","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009_bib0155","first-page":"4","article-title":"Manipal cervical scoring system by transvaginal ultrasound in predicting successful labour induction","volume":"9","author":"Bajpai","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"}],"container-title":["Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique & Fertilit\u00e9"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1297958916301047?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1297958916301047?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,11]],"date-time":"2018-09-11T22:24:44Z","timestamp":1536704684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1297958916301047"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1297958916301047"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["1297-9589"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1297-9589","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Les mesures \u00e9chographiques de la longueur cervicale et de la hauteur de la pr\u00e9sentation f\u0153tale sont-elles pr\u00e9dictives de l\u2019issue d\u2019accouchement chez des patientes \u00e0 terme\u00a0?","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique & Fertilit\u00e9","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2016.04.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}