{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,11]],"date-time":"2026-02-11T15:31:11Z","timestamp":1770823871032,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,1]],"date-time":"2013-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1383264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Human Pathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,9,25]],"date-time":"2013-09-25T10:48:17Z","timestamp":1380106097000},"page":"2542-2548","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Julia C.","family":"Gage","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nancy","family":"Joste","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brigette M.","family":"Ronnett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Stoler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"William C.","family":"Hunt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Schiffman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cosette M.","family":"Wheeler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2011.12.023","article-title":"Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology","volume":"43","author":"Campbell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.4103\/2153-3539.68332","article-title":"Digital images and the future of digital pathology","volume":"1","author":"Pantanowitz","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Pathol Inform"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.4103\/2153-3539.83746","article-title":"Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology","volume":"2","author":"Pantanowitz","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pathol Inform"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2009.04.006","article-title":"Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future","volume":"40","author":"Weinstein","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6890-6-4","article-title":"Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study","volume":"6","author":"Gilbertson","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMC Clin Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.3109\/00313025.2010.508787","article-title":"Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice","volume":"42","author":"Jara-Lazaro","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pathology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.5858\/2009-0678-OA.1","article-title":"Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images","volume":"135","author":"Jukic","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2006.10.006","article-title":"Feasibility and diagnostic agreement in teledermatopathology using a virtual slide system","volume":"38","author":"Massone","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1770","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2010.05.015","article-title":"Virtual microscopy: an evaluation of its validity and diagnostic performance in routine histologic diagnosis of skin tumors","volume":"41","author":"Nielsen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.298.6675.707","article-title":"Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"298","author":"Ismail","year":"1989","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(90)90107-Z","article-title":"Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia","volume":"43","author":"de Vet","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.48.1.59","article-title":"Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"48","author":"Creagh","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1136\/jcp.49.10.833","article-title":"Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems","volume":"49","author":"McCluggage","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Clin Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1500","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.11.1500","article-title":"Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study","volume":"285","author":"Stoler","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2005.07.040","article-title":"Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues","volume":"99","author":"Malpica","year":"2005","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e31825c31dd","article-title":"The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology","volume":"16","author":"Darragh","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.27608","article-title":"A population-based study of human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in the United States: Baseline measures prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination","volume":"132","author":"Wheeler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1966.10502021","article-title":"A note on equivalence of 2 test criteria for hypotheses in categorical data","volume":"61","author":"Bhapkar","year":"1966","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1080\/00949650701410249","article-title":"A bootstrap method for comparing correlated kappa coefficients","volume":"78","author":"Vanbelle","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Stat Comput Sim"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0100","series-title":"Generalized McNemar\u2019s test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions","author":"Sun","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(92)90056-S","article-title":"Sources of interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia","volume":"45","author":"de Vet","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2007.08.007","article-title":"Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies","volume":"39","author":"Fine","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2005.01.020","article-title":"Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading","volume":"36","author":"Helin","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015_bb0120","article-title":"Validating whole slide imaging systems for diagnostic purposes in pathology","year":"2011","journal-title":"Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2016.04.001","type":"erratum","label":"Erratum","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000}}],"container-title":["Human Pathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0046817713002694?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0046817713002694?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T16:33:38Z","timestamp":1758645218000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0046817713002694"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0046817713002694"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0046-8177"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0046-8177","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Human Pathology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.humpath.2013.06.015","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}