{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T16:32:01Z","timestamp":1780504321752,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,20]],"date-time":"2007-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1171929600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Objective<\/jats:italic>: To compare 3\u2010dimentional hysterosonography (3\u2010DHS) and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the evaluation of intrauterine lesions. <jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>: In this prospective study 124 women with suspected intrauterine abnormality on 2\u2010D ultrasonography or on hysterosalpingography were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy, 3\u2010DHS, and 3\u2010D power Doppler (3\u2010DPD) examination. However, 3\u2010DHS could not be performed in 3 of the women because of cervical stenosis. The sensitivity and specificity of 3\u2010DHS and 3\u2010DPD were compared with those of hysteroscopy. <jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>: Of the 121 women found to have an intracavitary abnormality, 20 had polyps, 11 had myomas, 2 had M\u00fcllerian duct anomalies, and 6 had synechiae on hysteroscopy. There was agreement between hysteroscopy and 3\u2010DHS in 19 of the polyp cases, 11 of the myoma cases, 2 of the M\u00fcllerian anomaly cases, and 4 of the synechiae cases. Examination with 3\u2010DHS and 3\u2010DPD reached a sensitivity of 91.9% and specificity of 98.8%, with a positive predictive value of 97.1% and a negative predictive value of 96.5%, respectively. <jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>: Examination with 3\u2010DHS and 3\u2010DPD both allows for accurate assessment of intrauterine abnormalities.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.10.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,21]],"date-time":"2007-02-21T12:16:34Z","timestamp":1172060194000},"page":"6-9","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":76,"title":["Three\u2010dimensional hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy for the detection of intracavitary uterine abnormalities"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"97","author":[{"given":"N.","family":"Makris","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Kalmantis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"N.","family":"Skartados","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Papadimitriou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"Mantzaris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Antsaklis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70680-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.8.1768"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1997.4678"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.1997.13.101"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","first-page":"171","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic examination of endometrial polyps: a comparison with two\u2010dimensional and three\u2010dimensional contrast sonography","volume":"26","author":"La Torne R.","year":"1999","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh557","article-title":"A comparative study of three\u2010dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids","volume":"20","author":"Salim R.","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.08040277.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","first-page":"51","article-title":"Three\u2010dimensional ultrasound and Power Doppler in assessment of uterine and ovarian angiogenesis: a prospective study","volume":"40","author":"Kurjak A.","year":"1996","journal-title":"Croat Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-66-787-588"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","first-page":"384","article-title":"Three\u2010dimensional ultrasound: a problem solving tool in complex gynecological cases","volume":"201","author":"Lev\u2010Toaff A.S.","year":"1996","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00154-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)80131-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1526-0976.2002.61003.x"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729206005522?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729206005522?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2006.10.012","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2006.10.012","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.10.012","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T06:55:44Z","timestamp":1696402544000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.10.012"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,20]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.10.012"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.10.012","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,20]]}}}