{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,29]],"date-time":"2025-08-29T09:47:45Z","timestamp":1756460865560},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,24]],"date-time":"2007-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1193184000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the 2 methods of cytologic screening to detect abnormalities of the cervical epithelium.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study with 3 groups of women was performed at Selcuk University Meram Medical School between January 2004 and March 2006. In one group (paired sample for specimen collection) women were screened with conventional cytology; in another group (paired sample for specimen collection) they were screened with liquid\u2010based cytology; and in the third group (split sample for specimen collection) they were screened by both methods.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The rate of unsatisfactory results was lower in the liquid\u2010based than in the conventional cytology group (6.1% vs. 2.6%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). More smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were detected by the liquid\u2010based method, but the difference was not statistically significant. Also, no statistically significant differences between liquid\u2010based and conventional cytology were observed in the detection of other epithelial abnormalities (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &gt; 0.05).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The liquid\u2010based and conventional cytology methods were found to be equivalent in the detection of cervical epithelial abnormalities.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,27]],"date-time":"2007-11-27T09:20:11Z","timestamp":1196155211000},"page":"163-166","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["A comparison of liquid\u2010based cytology with conventional cytology"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"100","author":[{"given":"\u00c7.","family":"\u00c7elik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Gezgin\u00e7","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Toy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Findik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Yilmaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.11786"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.21434"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00338.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_2","series-title":"Cytology","first-page":"61","volume-title":"Cervical vaginal cytology","author":"Cibas E.S.","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.16.2114"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_2","first-page":"627","volume-title":"Principle and practice of gynecologic oncology","author":"Wright T.C.","year":"2005"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_2","first-page":"137","article-title":"Liquid\u2010based cervical cytology","volume":"90","author":"Klinkamer P.J.","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-8258(03)00176-8"},{"volume-title":"Methods and techniques of cervical cancer screening. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening","year":"2004","author":"Arbyn M.","key":"e_1_2_5_11_2"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(03)00413-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2005.06.046"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.2006.00339.x"},{"issue":"17","key":"e_1_2_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1605","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.281.17.1605","article-title":"Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results","volume":"281","author":"Manos M.M.","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/93.4.293"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_2","first-page":"8","article-title":"The validation of cervical cytology. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values","volume":"35","author":"Soost H.J.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Acta Cytol"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/dc.10158"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000328292"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_20_2","first-page":"912","article-title":"Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP","volume":"45","author":"Tench W.","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0339(200001)22:1<52::AID-DC14>3.0.CO;2-#"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.11932"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)67961-0"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729207004997?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729207004997?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2007.07.023","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2007.07.023","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.023","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T21:14:43Z","timestamp":1696540483000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.023"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,24]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.023"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.023","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0020-7292"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1879-3479"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,24]]}}}