{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,7]],"date-time":"2025-12-07T03:46:22Z","timestamp":1765079182549},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]],"date-time":"2010-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1288656000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intl J Gynecology &amp; Obste"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) with conventional cervical cytology as a follow\u2010up cervical cancer screening method in women who had been treated previously with cryotherapy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Salvadoran women screened with VIA and treated with cryotherapy within 3 years were eligible to participate. Study participants were rescreened with VIA, Pap smear, colposcopy, 4\u2010quandrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Of 147 women enrolled in the study, post\u2010cryotherapy VIA was positive in 39 women (26.5%; 95% CI, 19.6%\u201334.4%). Of these 39, 1 woman had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post\u2010cryotherapy Pap smear was positive (ASCUS or higher) in 6 women (4.1%; 95% CI, 1.5%\u20138.7%). Of these 6, 2 women had CIN 1 or higher on biopsy. Post\u2010cryotherapy specificity was significantly higher for Pap compared with VIA (95.8% [138\/144]; 95% CI, 91.2%\u201398.5% vs 73.6% [106\/144]; 95% CI, 65.6%\u201380.6%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>As the single\u2010visit approach for cervical cancer screening gains popularity, more women will have been treated with cryotherapy. Appropriate follow\u2010up screening is therefore vital. Cytology may be a more suitable screening method than VIA in low\u2010resource settings for women treated previously with cryotherapy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,1]],"date-time":"2010-09-01T09:25:36Z","timestamp":1283333136000},"page":"249-252","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low\u2010resource setting"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"111","author":[{"given":"Miriam","family":"Cremer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimberley","family":"Bullard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mauricio","family":"Maza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ethel","family":"Peralta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lydia","family":"Garcia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rachel","family":"Masch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Veronica","family":"Lerner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Todd A.","family":"Alonzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Juan","family":"Felix","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(98)07033-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(96)00189-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<826::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)12707-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00265-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/0969141054855328"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.12.031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","unstructured":"Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention (ACCP). Effectiveness safety and acceptability of cryotherapy. Cervical Cancer Prevention Issues in Depth No 1 2003 January 2003."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(85)90003-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(92)90297-V"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348409156695"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","first-page":"200","article-title":"Histological evaluation of cryosurgery in high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN\u2010III) of the uterine cervix [in Spanish]","volume":"58","author":"Rojas I.","year":"1993","journal-title":"Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1525-1438.2007.01112.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003485"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6603633"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2150::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709015730"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","first-page":"793","article-title":"Comparison of cryo\u2010 and carbon dioxide laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"66","author":"Ferenczy A.","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/LGT.0b013e31816d1da4"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729210003735?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0020729210003735?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2010.06.022","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.ijgo.2010.06.022","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.022","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,26]],"date-time":"2023-09-26T06:20:50Z","timestamp":1695709250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.022"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.022"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.06.022","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0020-7292","1879-3479"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0020-7292","type":"print"},{"value":"1879-3479","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,11,2]]}}}